Long-term results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in degenerated surgical aortic valves-a propensity score matched analysis.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kornelia Löw, Julius Steffen, Nike Knufinke, Carolin Fröhlich, Julius Fischer, Magda Haum, Hans Theiss, Sven Peterss, Konstantin Stark, Jörg Hausleiter, Steffen Massberg, Simon Deseive
{"title":"Long-term results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in degenerated surgical aortic valves-a propensity score matched analysis.","authors":"Kornelia Löw, Julius Steffen, Nike Knufinke, Carolin Fröhlich, Julius Fischer, Magda Haum, Hans Theiss, Sven Peterss, Konstantin Stark, Jörg Hausleiter, Steffen Massberg, Simon Deseive","doi":"10.1007/s00392-025-02670-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to analyse long-term valve function and all-cause mortality of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to degenerated surgical aortic valve (SAV) bioprostheses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center study, all consecutive patients undergoing TAVR between December 2012 and December 2020 were included. Long-term echocardiographic results, functional status and 5-year all-cause mortality were analysed in patients with TAV-in-SAV and native valve TAVR in a propensity score matched analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 3423 patients who were eligible for the study, 136 experienced bioprosthetic valve dysfunction, whereas 3287 patients underwent native valve TAVR. After 2:1 propensity score matching, baseline characteristics without relation to prior SAVR were comparable between both groups. Regarding 5-year all-cause mortality, no difference was observed between patients with prior SAVR and native valve TAVR, in either unadjusted analysis, or after propensity score matching (corresponding hazard ratio: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.70-1.30, p = 0.75). In addition, while pressure gradients were higher in patients with TAV-in-SAV in long-term echocardiographic follow-up, moderate or severe hemodynamic valve deterioration did not occur more often in this group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this propensity score matched analysis, long-term all-cause mortality and echocardiographic valve function of patients with TAVR in prior bioprosthesis were comparable to patients with native valve TAVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02670-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to analyse long-term valve function and all-cause mortality of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to degenerated surgical aortic valve (SAV) bioprostheses.

Methods: In this single-center study, all consecutive patients undergoing TAVR between December 2012 and December 2020 were included. Long-term echocardiographic results, functional status and 5-year all-cause mortality were analysed in patients with TAV-in-SAV and native valve TAVR in a propensity score matched analysis.

Results: Out of 3423 patients who were eligible for the study, 136 experienced bioprosthetic valve dysfunction, whereas 3287 patients underwent native valve TAVR. After 2:1 propensity score matching, baseline characteristics without relation to prior SAVR were comparable between both groups. Regarding 5-year all-cause mortality, no difference was observed between patients with prior SAVR and native valve TAVR, in either unadjusted analysis, or after propensity score matching (corresponding hazard ratio: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.70-1.30, p = 0.75). In addition, while pressure gradients were higher in patients with TAV-in-SAV in long-term echocardiographic follow-up, moderate or severe hemodynamic valve deterioration did not occur more often in this group.

Conclusions: In this propensity score matched analysis, long-term all-cause mortality and echocardiographic valve function of patients with TAVR in prior bioprosthesis were comparable to patients with native valve TAVR.

经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗退行性手术主动脉瓣的长期结果——倾向评分匹配分析。
背景:本研究的目的是分析因外科主动脉瓣(SAV)生物假体变性而行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者的长期瓣膜功能和全因死亡率。方法:在这项单中心研究中,纳入了2012年12月至2020年12月期间所有连续接受TAVR的患者。在倾向评分匹配分析中,分析了长期超声心动图结果、功能状态和5年全因死亡率。结果:在符合研究条件的3423例患者中,136例经历了生物瓣膜功能障碍,而3287例患者经历了天然瓣膜TAVR。在2:1的倾向评分匹配后,两组之间没有与先前SAVR相关的基线特征具有可比性。关于5年全因死亡率,无论是在未调整分析中,还是在倾向评分匹配后,均未观察到既往SAVR患者与原发瓣膜TAVR患者之间的差异(相应的风险比:0.95,95% CI: 0.70-1.30, p = 0.75)。此外,在长期超声心动图随访中,虽然TAV-in-SAV患者的压力梯度较高,但该组中中度或重度血流动力学瓣膜恶化的发生率并不高。结论:在倾向评分匹配分析中,先前生物假体TAVR患者的长期全因死亡率和超声心动图瓣膜功能与天然瓣膜TAVR患者相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信