Wait times for breast cancer surgery in lean and traditional care pathways: a multi-group path analysis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-21 Print Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.005524
Tracy A Freeze, Natasha E Hanson, Leanne L Skerry, Morgan E Nesbitt, Patricia L Bryden, Stephen A Smith, Sharon S Y Chiu
{"title":"Wait times for breast cancer surgery in lean and traditional care pathways: a multi-group path analysis.","authors":"Tracy A Freeze, Natasha E Hanson, Leanne L Skerry, Morgan E Nesbitt, Patricia L Bryden, Stephen A Smith, Sharon S Y Chiu","doi":"10.1503/cjs.005524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research examining the impact of different models of care on wait times for breast cancer surgery indicates that organized assessment can reduce wait times, but few researchers have explored different care approaches between care sites serving a mixture of urban and rural patients and breast cancer care outcomes, especially within the Canadian context. Therefore, we sought to explore whether wait times from mammogram to surgery differed between lean referral and traditional referral pathways and what areas of inefficiencies need to be addressed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a retrospective case review design and collected information on female patients (aged ≥ 19 yr) with stage 0-III breast cancer who were surgically treated between February 2016 and July 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients referred in the traditional pathway of care (<i>n</i> = 208) had longer wait times than patients in the lean pathway of care (<i>n</i> = 248), with an average wait time difference of 9.3 days. For both care pathways, receiving a screening mammogram, living farther from the hospital, and receiving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) increased wait times to surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conducting the biopsy immediately after an abnormal mammogram, improving wait times for MRIs, and improving access for rural patients may be important areas of change-related focus. Shorter wait times to breast cancer surgery in the lean pathway support the advantage of a referral system whereby organized navigated systems coordinate all aspects of diagnosis and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 3","pages":"E175-E181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12114113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.005524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research examining the impact of different models of care on wait times for breast cancer surgery indicates that organized assessment can reduce wait times, but few researchers have explored different care approaches between care sites serving a mixture of urban and rural patients and breast cancer care outcomes, especially within the Canadian context. Therefore, we sought to explore whether wait times from mammogram to surgery differed between lean referral and traditional referral pathways and what areas of inefficiencies need to be addressed.

Methods: We used a retrospective case review design and collected information on female patients (aged ≥ 19 yr) with stage 0-III breast cancer who were surgically treated between February 2016 and July 2019.

Results: Patients referred in the traditional pathway of care (n = 208) had longer wait times than patients in the lean pathway of care (n = 248), with an average wait time difference of 9.3 days. For both care pathways, receiving a screening mammogram, living farther from the hospital, and receiving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) increased wait times to surgery.

Conclusion: Conducting the biopsy immediately after an abnormal mammogram, improving wait times for MRIs, and improving access for rural patients may be important areas of change-related focus. Shorter wait times to breast cancer surgery in the lean pathway support the advantage of a referral system whereby organized navigated systems coordinate all aspects of diagnosis and treatment.

乳腺癌手术在精益和传统护理途径的等待时间:多组路径分析。
背景:研究检查了不同护理模式对乳腺癌手术等待时间的影响,表明有组织的评估可以减少等待时间,但很少有研究人员探索不同的护理方法,为城市和农村患者提供混合护理,以及乳腺癌护理结果,特别是在加拿大的背景下。因此,我们试图探索从乳房x光检查到手术的等待时间在精益转诊和传统转诊途径之间是否存在差异,以及需要解决哪些效率低下的领域。方法:采用回顾性病例回顾设计,收集2016年2月至2019年7月期间接受手术治疗的0-III期乳腺癌女性患者(年龄≥19岁)的信息。结果:传统路径患者(n = 208)比精益路径患者(n = 248)的等待时间更长,平均等待时间差9.3天。对于这两种治疗途径,接受乳房x光筛查、住得离医院更远以及接受磁共振成像(MRI)都会增加手术等待时间。结论:在异常乳房x光检查后立即进行活检,改善等待核磁共振成像的时间,改善农村患者的可及性可能是改变相关重点的重要领域。在精益途径中,较短的乳腺癌手术等待时间支持转诊系统的优势,通过有组织的导航系统协调诊断和治疗的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信