Anchoring the sign-out phase of the Surgical Safety Checklist to emergence from anesthesia: a proof-of-concept quality-improvement study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-21 Print Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.003324
Braeden M Page, David R Urbach, Michaela Pisani, Richard Brull
{"title":"Anchoring the sign-out phase of the Surgical Safety Checklist to emergence from anesthesia: a proof-of-concept quality-improvement study.","authors":"Braeden M Page, David R Urbach, Michaela Pisani, Richard Brull","doi":"10.1503/cjs.003324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is a communication tool used to improve patient safety and teamwork within operating rooms. Unlike the sign-in and timeout phases, the timing for completion of the sign-out phase is ambiguous, lacks a clear and definitive clinical anchor on when to be performed, and fails to capture important safety data related to the patient's emergence from anesthesia, wherein the risks of complications are greatest. We sought to assess perceptions of operating room team members on whether emergence from anesthesia is an appropriate clinical anchor to conduct the SSC sign-out phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-centre proof-of-concept quality-improvement study, the sign-out phase of the SSC was performed following patient emergence from anesthesia. Operating room team members from surgery, anesthesiology, and nursing were approached to complete a self-administered questionnaire. Participants were asked whether, compared with routine sign-out performance, performing the sign-out phase following emergence from anesthesia maximized patient safety, compliance, communication, team member availability, and quality improvement. Responses were graded on a 5-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two operating room team members participated in our study. After experiencing the intervention, most participants agreed or strongly agreed that performing the sign-out phase following emergence from anesthesia maximized patient safety (70.7%), compliance (67.1%), communication (75.6%), and quality improvement (67.0%). More than half agreed that performing the sign-out following emergence from anesthesia maximized team member availability (59.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This proof-of-concept quality-improvement study suggests that emergence from anesthesia is an appropriate clinical anchor for the time to perform the SSC sign-out phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 3","pages":"E182-E189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.003324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is a communication tool used to improve patient safety and teamwork within operating rooms. Unlike the sign-in and timeout phases, the timing for completion of the sign-out phase is ambiguous, lacks a clear and definitive clinical anchor on when to be performed, and fails to capture important safety data related to the patient's emergence from anesthesia, wherein the risks of complications are greatest. We sought to assess perceptions of operating room team members on whether emergence from anesthesia is an appropriate clinical anchor to conduct the SSC sign-out phase.

Methods: In this single-centre proof-of-concept quality-improvement study, the sign-out phase of the SSC was performed following patient emergence from anesthesia. Operating room team members from surgery, anesthesiology, and nursing were approached to complete a self-administered questionnaire. Participants were asked whether, compared with routine sign-out performance, performing the sign-out phase following emergence from anesthesia maximized patient safety, compliance, communication, team member availability, and quality improvement. Responses were graded on a 5-point Likert scale.

Results: Eighty-two operating room team members participated in our study. After experiencing the intervention, most participants agreed or strongly agreed that performing the sign-out phase following emergence from anesthesia maximized patient safety (70.7%), compliance (67.1%), communication (75.6%), and quality improvement (67.0%). More than half agreed that performing the sign-out following emergence from anesthesia maximized team member availability (59.8%).

Conclusion: This proof-of-concept quality-improvement study suggests that emergence from anesthesia is an appropriate clinical anchor for the time to perform the SSC sign-out phase.

将手术安全检查表的签到阶段固定到麻醉后出现:一项概念验证质量改进研究。
背景:手术安全检查表(SSC)是一种沟通工具,用于提高患者安全和手术室内的团队合作。与签到和暂停阶段不同,签到阶段的完成时间是不明确的,缺乏明确的临床锚点,无法获得与患者麻醉后出现相关的重要安全数据,其中并发症的风险最大。我们试图评估手术室团队成员对麻醉苏醒是否是进行SSC签到阶段的合适临床锚点的看法。方法:在这个单中心的概念验证质量改进研究中,SSC的签到阶段是在患者麻醉苏醒后进行的。来自外科、麻醉科和护理的手术室团队成员被要求完成一份自我管理的问卷。参与者被问及,与常规的签出表现相比,麻醉苏醒后的签出阶段是否最大限度地提高了患者的安全性、依从性、沟通、团队成员的可用性和质量改进。回答以5分的李克特量表进行评分。结果:82名手术室团队成员参与了我们的研究。在经历了干预后,大多数参与者同意或强烈同意麻醉苏醒后进行登记阶段最大限度地提高了患者的安全性(70.7%)、依从性(67.1%)、沟通(75.6%)和质量改善(67.0%)。超过一半的人(59.8%)同意在麻醉后进行登记可以最大限度地提高团队成员的可用性。结论:这项概念验证的质量改进研究表明,麻醉苏醒是执行SSC签出阶段的合适临床锚点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信