Baohua Zhang, Yang Han, Huan He, Li Jin, Lidong Zhang
{"title":"Chewing gum on postoperative oral Malodor in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a randomized non-inferiority trial.","authors":"Baohua Zhang, Yang Han, Huan He, Li Jin, Lidong Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03134-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to determine whether preoperative chewing gum is non-inferior to Chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash in reducing halitosis in patients undergoing elective general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority controlled trial involving patients undergoing surgery requiring endotracheal intubation for ≤ 3 h. Participants were randomly assigned to either the CHX mouthwash group (Group M) or the chewing gum group (Group N). Thirty minutes before general anesthesia, patients in Group M rinsed their mouths with 10 ml of CHX mouthwash, while those in Group N chewed Trident mint gum. The primary outcome was the incidence of halitosis in both groups, assessed before endotracheal intubation and at extubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 733 patients were included, with 365 patients in Group M and 368 patients in Group N. The incidence of halitosis in both groups was significantly reduced compared to baseline. Before extubation, the improvement in halitosis was greater in Group N than in Group M (P < 0.05). After extubation, the improvement in halitosis in Group N was non-inferior to that in Group M (Z = 1.96, 95% CI: -0.0898 to 0.0944, p = 0.0023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients undergoing elective general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, chewing gum was found to be non-inferior to CHX mouthwash in improving postoperative halitosis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2400082035 (date of registration: 19/03/2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03134-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: We aimed to determine whether preoperative chewing gum is non-inferior to Chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash in reducing halitosis in patients undergoing elective general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.
Methods: We conducted a randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority controlled trial involving patients undergoing surgery requiring endotracheal intubation for ≤ 3 h. Participants were randomly assigned to either the CHX mouthwash group (Group M) or the chewing gum group (Group N). Thirty minutes before general anesthesia, patients in Group M rinsed their mouths with 10 ml of CHX mouthwash, while those in Group N chewed Trident mint gum. The primary outcome was the incidence of halitosis in both groups, assessed before endotracheal intubation and at extubation.
Results: A total of 733 patients were included, with 365 patients in Group M and 368 patients in Group N. The incidence of halitosis in both groups was significantly reduced compared to baseline. Before extubation, the improvement in halitosis was greater in Group N than in Group M (P < 0.05). After extubation, the improvement in halitosis in Group N was non-inferior to that in Group M (Z = 1.96, 95% CI: -0.0898 to 0.0944, p = 0.0023).
Conclusions: In patients undergoing elective general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, chewing gum was found to be non-inferior to CHX mouthwash in improving postoperative halitosis.
Trial registration: Chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2400082035 (date of registration: 19/03/2024).
背景:我们的目的是确定术前口香糖在减少选择性气管插管全麻患者口臭方面是否优于氯己定(CHX)漱口水。方法:我们进行了一项随机、单盲、非劣效对照试验,纳入了需要气管插管≤3小时的手术患者。参与者被随机分配到CHX漱口水组(M组)和口香糖组(N组)。全麻前30分钟,M组患者用10 ml CHX漱口水漱口,N组患者咀嚼Trident薄荷口香糖。主要结果是两组患者的口臭发生率,分别在气管插管前和拔管时进行评估。结果:共纳入733例患者,M组365例,n组368例,两组患者口臭发生率均较基线显著降低。拔管前,N组对口臭的改善明显大于M组(P)。结论:择期全麻气管插管患者,口香糖改善术后口臭的效果不逊于CHX漱口水。试验注册:chictr.org ChiCTR2400082035(注册日期:19/03/2024)。
期刊介绍:
BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.