Katherine Forrester, Thomas R. Blanda, Marena Trauger, Rachel Thompson, Neil Templeton
{"title":"Minimizing batch-to-batch variability of a live virus vaccine by process analytical technologies","authors":"Katherine Forrester, Thomas R. Blanda, Marena Trauger, Rachel Thompson, Neil Templeton","doi":"10.1002/btpr.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For bioprocesses producing live virus, such as enterovirus Coxsackievirus A21, viral titer (infectivity basis) decay rates can exceed 30% within a day. Consequently, harvest timing is paramount. To optimize titer at harvest, a continuous viral product titer model was generated to elucidate kinetics. The model leveraged experimentally determined viable cell density, cell-specific viral productivity, and viral specific decay rates. Next, three separate online process analytical technology (PAT) harvest triggers were developed to predict maximal viral titer. Finally, the PAT harvest triggers were tested alongside traditional time-based harvests. The harvest triggers utilized common bioprocessing tools – dissolved oxygen (DO) and capacitance probes – to track DO and viable cell volume (VCV) and derived a third parameter, cell-specific oxygen uptake rate. Harvesting with PAT triggers allowed for significantly improved batch-to-batch consistency. The standard deviation of harvest yield was reduced by 41% (DO), 56% (OUR) and 71% (capacitance) as compared to the industry standard time-based harvest. Even when a process deviation in inoculated cell density occurred, causing a significant shift in viral titer kinetics, the PAT harvest triggers yielded greater than 87% of peak titer. By comparison, the time-based harvest yielded 16%.</p>","PeriodicalId":8856,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Progress","volume":"41 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/btpr.70037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/btpr.70037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For bioprocesses producing live virus, such as enterovirus Coxsackievirus A21, viral titer (infectivity basis) decay rates can exceed 30% within a day. Consequently, harvest timing is paramount. To optimize titer at harvest, a continuous viral product titer model was generated to elucidate kinetics. The model leveraged experimentally determined viable cell density, cell-specific viral productivity, and viral specific decay rates. Next, three separate online process analytical technology (PAT) harvest triggers were developed to predict maximal viral titer. Finally, the PAT harvest triggers were tested alongside traditional time-based harvests. The harvest triggers utilized common bioprocessing tools – dissolved oxygen (DO) and capacitance probes – to track DO and viable cell volume (VCV) and derived a third parameter, cell-specific oxygen uptake rate. Harvesting with PAT triggers allowed for significantly improved batch-to-batch consistency. The standard deviation of harvest yield was reduced by 41% (DO), 56% (OUR) and 71% (capacitance) as compared to the industry standard time-based harvest. Even when a process deviation in inoculated cell density occurred, causing a significant shift in viral titer kinetics, the PAT harvest triggers yielded greater than 87% of peak titer. By comparison, the time-based harvest yielded 16%.
期刊介绍:
Biotechnology Progress , an official, bimonthly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and its technological community, the Society for Biological Engineering, features peer-reviewed research articles, reviews, and descriptions of emerging techniques for the development and design of new processes, products, and devices for the biotechnology, biopharmaceutical and bioprocess industries.
Widespread interest includes application of biological and engineering principles in fields such as applied cellular physiology and metabolic engineering, biocatalysis and bioreactor design, bioseparations and downstream processing, cell culture and tissue engineering, biosensors and process control, bioinformatics and systems biology, biomaterials and artificial organs, stem cell biology and genetics, and plant biology and food science. Manuscripts concerning the design of related processes, products, or devices are also encouraged. Four types of manuscripts are printed in the Journal: Research Papers, Topical or Review Papers, Letters to the Editor, and R & D Notes.