Risk perception of emergency medical technicians in biological disasters: a comparison between COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 cases.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Mohammad Azim Mahmodi, Ayob Akbari, Seyyed Mohammad Reza Hosseini, Zahra Amouzeshi
{"title":"Risk perception of emergency medical technicians in biological disasters: a comparison between COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 cases.","authors":"Mohammad Azim Mahmodi, Ayob Akbari, Seyyed Mohammad Reza Hosseini, Zahra Amouzeshi","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01239-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency medical technicians (EMTs), positioned at the forefront of medical services, are at greater risk of contracting COVID-19 and passing it on to their families and communities than others. Recognizing the risks associated with this disease can play a crucial role in the care and prevention process. Consequently, this study evaluated the level of risk perception (RP) regarding COVID-19 among EMTs and compared it between those who have contracted the disease and those who have not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study conducted in 2021. This study employed simple random sampling to select 200 EMTs affiliated with Birjand University of Medical Sciences. The sample included 100 EMTs who had contracted COVID-19 and 100 who had not. Data were collected through a researcher-designed questionnaire, distributed online via WhatsApp and Telegram groups among the participants. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16, utilizing descriptive statistical methods (frequency, mean, and standard deviation) along with inferential statistical tests such as independent t-tests, chi-square, and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The infected EMTs exhibited a moderate perception of the risk of COVID-19, while the non-infected EMTs reported a high level of RP. The independent t-test confirmed that the mean total score for COVID-19 RP was significantly lower in the infected EMTs compared to the non-infected group (mean RP score: infected 150.82 ± 32.24 vs. non-infected 161.54 ± 22.50, P = 0.007). Additionally, ANOVA revealed that none of the demographic variables individually had a significant impact on the level of COVID-19 RP (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the interaction effect between the demographic variables and the groups was also insignificant (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EMTs who contracted COVID-19 had a significantly lower RP compared to their non-infected counterparts. This reduced awareness of COVID-19 risks likely contributed to their infection, highlighting the critical role of RP in disease prevention. Targeted educational programs to enhance RP among EMTs could foster stronger adherence to preventive measures, ultimately reducing infection rates during future biological disasters. Therefore, this study not only contributes to expanding existing knowledge in this field but also assists policymakers and health administrators in improving decision-making to strengthen epidemic preparedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01239-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency medical technicians (EMTs), positioned at the forefront of medical services, are at greater risk of contracting COVID-19 and passing it on to their families and communities than others. Recognizing the risks associated with this disease can play a crucial role in the care and prevention process. Consequently, this study evaluated the level of risk perception (RP) regarding COVID-19 among EMTs and compared it between those who have contracted the disease and those who have not.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study conducted in 2021. This study employed simple random sampling to select 200 EMTs affiliated with Birjand University of Medical Sciences. The sample included 100 EMTs who had contracted COVID-19 and 100 who had not. Data were collected through a researcher-designed questionnaire, distributed online via WhatsApp and Telegram groups among the participants. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16, utilizing descriptive statistical methods (frequency, mean, and standard deviation) along with inferential statistical tests such as independent t-tests, chi-square, and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results: The infected EMTs exhibited a moderate perception of the risk of COVID-19, while the non-infected EMTs reported a high level of RP. The independent t-test confirmed that the mean total score for COVID-19 RP was significantly lower in the infected EMTs compared to the non-infected group (mean RP score: infected 150.82 ± 32.24 vs. non-infected 161.54 ± 22.50, P = 0.007). Additionally, ANOVA revealed that none of the demographic variables individually had a significant impact on the level of COVID-19 RP (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the interaction effect between the demographic variables and the groups was also insignificant (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: EMTs who contracted COVID-19 had a significantly lower RP compared to their non-infected counterparts. This reduced awareness of COVID-19 risks likely contributed to their infection, highlighting the critical role of RP in disease prevention. Targeted educational programs to enhance RP among EMTs could foster stronger adherence to preventive measures, ultimately reducing infection rates during future biological disasters. Therefore, this study not only contributes to expanding existing knowledge in this field but also assists policymakers and health administrators in improving decision-making to strengthen epidemic preparedness.

紧急医疗技术人员在生物灾害中的风险感知:COVID-19与非COVID-19病例的比较
背景:处于医疗服务前沿的紧急医疗技术人员比其他人更有可能感染COVID-19并将其传播给家人和社区。认识到与这种疾病相关的风险可以在护理和预防过程中发挥关键作用。因此,本研究评估了emt对COVID-19的风险感知水平(RP),并比较了感染该疾病的人和未感染该疾病的人之间的风险感知水平。方法:这是一项于2021年进行的横断面描述性分析研究。本研究采用简单随机抽样的方法,选取200名隶属于Birjand医科大学的急诊医师。样本包括100名感染COVID-19的急救医生和100名未感染COVID-19的急救医生。数据是通过研究人员设计的问卷收集的,通过WhatsApp和Telegram在参与者中在线分发。使用SPSS version 16对数据进行分析,采用描述性统计方法(频率、平均值和标准差)以及独立t检验、卡方检验和双向方差分析(ANOVA)等推理统计检验。结果:感染的emt表现出中等程度的COVID-19风险感知,而未感染的emt报告了高水平的RP。独立t检验证实,感染EMTs的COVID-19 RP平均总分明显低于未感染组(平均RP评分:感染150.82±32.24比未感染161.54±22.50,P = 0.007)。此外,方差分析显示,人口统计学变量均未对COVID-19 RP水平产生显著影响(P < 0.05)。此外,人口学变量与组间的交互作用也不显著(P < 0.05)。结论:与未感染的同行相比,感染COVID-19的急诊医生的RP显着降低。这种对COVID-19风险认识的降低可能导致了他们的感染,凸显了RP在疾病预防中的关键作用。有针对性的教育项目,以提高急诊医务人员的RP可以促进更强的坚持预防措施,最终降低感染率在未来的生物灾害。因此,本研究不仅有助于扩大这一领域的现有知识,而且有助于决策者和卫生管理者改进决策,加强疫情防范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信