Deep learning reconstruction in biparametric prostate MRI: Impact on qualitative and radiomics analyses

Jérémy Dana , Evan McNabb , Juan Castro , Ibtisam Al-Qanoobi , Yoshie Omiya , Kenny Ah-Lan , Véronique Fortier , Giovanni Artho , Caroline Reinhold , Simon Gauvin
{"title":"Deep learning reconstruction in biparametric prostate MRI: Impact on qualitative and radiomics analyses","authors":"Jérémy Dana ,&nbsp;Evan McNabb ,&nbsp;Juan Castro ,&nbsp;Ibtisam Al-Qanoobi ,&nbsp;Yoshie Omiya ,&nbsp;Kenny Ah-Lan ,&nbsp;Véronique Fortier ,&nbsp;Giovanni Artho ,&nbsp;Caroline Reinhold ,&nbsp;Simon Gauvin","doi":"10.1016/j.redii.2025.100059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the impact of a commercially available deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm on qualitative and radiomics analyses in prostate MRI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-centre retrospective cohort included 25 consecutive patients who underwent a prostate MRI (1.5 T) in 2022. T2-weighted (T2WI), diffusion-weighted (DWI; b = 50, 1000, extrapolated 2000 s/mm<sup>2</sup>) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images were reconstructed using DLR and standard (non-DLR) techniques. The two sets were mixed and blind-reviewed independently by six radiologists. Images were qualitatively scored according to PI-QUAL score, overall image quality, diagnostic confidence, anatomical conspicuity, artifact, and noise. Transition and peripheral zones were segmented and radiomics features extracted from region-of-interests using Pyradiomics package. Qualitative criteria and radiomics were compared using a pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>PI-QUAL score was not significantly different (<em>p</em> = 0.32). Overall image quality was not significantly different (<em>p</em> = 0.21 on T2WI and 0.56 on DWI/ADC). Noise was lower on DLR images for T2WI (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) and DWI/ADC (<em>p</em> = 0.04). Diagnostic confidence in excluding clinically significant cancer (PI-RADS ≥ 3) in the transition zone was lower with DLR images (p = 0.02). In the transition zone, 89/93 (96 %) of the radiomics features were significantly different between non-DLR and DLR images on T2WI, 68/93 (73 %) on DWI b-2000 s/mm<sup>2</sup>, and 55/93 (59 %) on ADC images. In the peripheral zone, 91/93 (98 %) were significantly different on T2WI, 50/93 (54 %) on DWI b-2000 s/mm<sup>2</sup>, and 70/93 (75 %) on ADC images.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Radiomics features were significantly different on DLR images which should encourage caution for clinical and research purposes. DLR algorithm decreases noise while preserving overall image quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74676,"journal":{"name":"Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100059"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772652525000055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the impact of a commercially available deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm on qualitative and radiomics analyses in prostate MRI.

Methods

This single-centre retrospective cohort included 25 consecutive patients who underwent a prostate MRI (1.5 T) in 2022. T2-weighted (T2WI), diffusion-weighted (DWI; b = 50, 1000, extrapolated 2000 s/mm2) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images were reconstructed using DLR and standard (non-DLR) techniques. The two sets were mixed and blind-reviewed independently by six radiologists. Images were qualitatively scored according to PI-QUAL score, overall image quality, diagnostic confidence, anatomical conspicuity, artifact, and noise. Transition and peripheral zones were segmented and radiomics features extracted from region-of-interests using Pyradiomics package. Qualitative criteria and radiomics were compared using a pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

PI-QUAL score was not significantly different (p = 0.32). Overall image quality was not significantly different (p = 0.21 on T2WI and 0.56 on DWI/ADC). Noise was lower on DLR images for T2WI (p < 0.01) and DWI/ADC (p = 0.04). Diagnostic confidence in excluding clinically significant cancer (PI-RADS ≥ 3) in the transition zone was lower with DLR images (p = 0.02). In the transition zone, 89/93 (96 %) of the radiomics features were significantly different between non-DLR and DLR images on T2WI, 68/93 (73 %) on DWI b-2000 s/mm2, and 55/93 (59 %) on ADC images. In the peripheral zone, 91/93 (98 %) were significantly different on T2WI, 50/93 (54 %) on DWI b-2000 s/mm2, and 70/93 (75 %) on ADC images.

Conclusion

Radiomics features were significantly different on DLR images which should encourage caution for clinical and research purposes. DLR algorithm decreases noise while preserving overall image quality.
双参数前列腺MRI的深度学习重建:对定性和放射组学分析的影响
目的评估商用深度学习重建(DLR)算法对前列腺MRI定性和放射组学分析的影响。方法该单中心回顾性队列包括25例于2022年接受前列腺MRI (1.5 T)检查的连续患者。t2加权(T2WI),扩散加权(DWI;b = 50, 1000,外推2000 s/mm2)和表观扩散系数(ADC)图像重建使用DLR和标准(非DLR)技术。这两组数据由6名放射科医生进行混合和独立盲检。根据PI-QUAL评分、总体图像质量、诊断置信度、解剖显著性、伪影和噪声对图像进行定性评分。利用Pyradiomics软件包对过渡区和外围区进行分割,提取感兴趣区域的放射组学特征。定性标准和放射组学采用两两Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行比较。结果pi - qual评分差异无统计学意义(p = 0.32)。总体图像质量差异无统计学意义(T2WI p = 0.21, DWI/ADC p = 0.56)。T2WI的DLR图像噪声较低(p <;DWI/ADC (p = 0.04)。DLR影像排除过渡区临床显著癌(PI-RADS≥3)的诊断置信度较低(p = 0.02)。在过渡区,T2WI非DLR影像与DLR影像的放射组学特征差异有89/93 (96%),DWI b-2000 s/mm2影像的放射组学特征差异有68/93 (73%),ADC影像的放射组学特征差异有55/93(59%)。在周围区,T2WI呈91/93 (98%),DWI b-2000 s/mm2呈50/93 (54%),ADC呈70/93(75%)。结论放射组学特征在DLR图像上有显著差异,临床和研究应谨慎。DLR算法在保持整体图像质量的同时降低了噪声。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信