Deep learning techniques for automated coronary artery segmentation and coronary artery disease detection: A systematic review of the last decade (2013-2024)
IF 4.9 2区 医学Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Suleyman Yaman , Ozkan Aslan , Hasan Güler , Abdulkadir Sengur , Abdul Hafeez-Baig , Ru-San Tan , Ravinesh C Deo , Prabal Datta Barua , U. Rajendra Acharya
{"title":"Deep learning techniques for automated coronary artery segmentation and coronary artery disease detection: A systematic review of the last decade (2013-2024)","authors":"Suleyman Yaman , Ozkan Aslan , Hasan Güler , Abdulkadir Sengur , Abdul Hafeez-Baig , Ru-San Tan , Ravinesh C Deo , Prabal Datta Barua , U. Rajendra Acharya","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cardiovascular disease, exacting high morbidity and mortality worldwide. CAD is detected on coronary artery imaging; coronary artery segmentation (CAS) of the images is essential for coronary lesion characterization. Both CAD detection and CAS require expert input, are labor-intensive, and error-prone.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Deep learning (DL) techniques have achieved significant success in CAS and CAD detection, with many studies published recently. This study is an up-to-date systematic review of research on automated DL models for CAS and CAD detection in the past decade (2013-2024).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Using PRISMA methodology, an initial literature search of 1,589 publications was conducted, from which 97 high-impact Q1 studies were selected based on pre-defined eligibility criteria. These studies were analyzed in terms of DL techniques employed, datasets, modalities, and performance metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 97 studies, most of which were published after 2016, 47 focused on CAS, 49 on CAD detection, and one on both tasks. CNN-based models were dominant in both domains. For CAS, CCTA was the most frequently used input modality, and U-Net was employed in 38 out of 48 studies, with recent works incorporating attention mechanisms and graph neural networks. ASOCA was the most widely used benchmark dataset. For CAD detection, ECG was the most common modality, with 45 out of 50 studies utilizing CNNs, and 20 of those relying purely on CNN architectures. Hybrid and multimodal models have become more prominent in recent years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review identified several challenges, including limited public datasets, variability in performance metrics, and model complexity. Future studies should focus on larger, diverse datasets and lightweight models integrating explainable artificial intelligence and uncertainty quantification to improve clinical applicability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10624,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","volume":"268 ","pages":"Article 108858"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260725002755","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cardiovascular disease, exacting high morbidity and mortality worldwide. CAD is detected on coronary artery imaging; coronary artery segmentation (CAS) of the images is essential for coronary lesion characterization. Both CAD detection and CAS require expert input, are labor-intensive, and error-prone.
Objectives
Deep learning (DL) techniques have achieved significant success in CAS and CAD detection, with many studies published recently. This study is an up-to-date systematic review of research on automated DL models for CAS and CAD detection in the past decade (2013-2024).
Method
Using PRISMA methodology, an initial literature search of 1,589 publications was conducted, from which 97 high-impact Q1 studies were selected based on pre-defined eligibility criteria. These studies were analyzed in terms of DL techniques employed, datasets, modalities, and performance metrics.
Results
Of the 97 studies, most of which were published after 2016, 47 focused on CAS, 49 on CAD detection, and one on both tasks. CNN-based models were dominant in both domains. For CAS, CCTA was the most frequently used input modality, and U-Net was employed in 38 out of 48 studies, with recent works incorporating attention mechanisms and graph neural networks. ASOCA was the most widely used benchmark dataset. For CAD detection, ECG was the most common modality, with 45 out of 50 studies utilizing CNNs, and 20 of those relying purely on CNN architectures. Hybrid and multimodal models have become more prominent in recent years.
Conclusion
This review identified several challenges, including limited public datasets, variability in performance metrics, and model complexity. Future studies should focus on larger, diverse datasets and lightweight models integrating explainable artificial intelligence and uncertainty quantification to improve clinical applicability.
期刊介绍:
To encourage the development of formal computing methods, and their application in biomedical research and medical practice, by illustration of fundamental principles in biomedical informatics research; to stimulate basic research into application software design; to report the state of research of biomedical information processing projects; to report new computer methodologies applied in biomedical areas; the eventual distribution of demonstrable software to avoid duplication of effort; to provide a forum for discussion and improvement of existing software; to optimize contact between national organizations and regional user groups by promoting an international exchange of information on formal methods, standards and software in biomedicine.
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine covers computing methodology and software systems derived from computing science for implementation in all aspects of biomedical research and medical practice. It is designed to serve: biochemists; biologists; geneticists; immunologists; neuroscientists; pharmacologists; toxicologists; clinicians; epidemiologists; psychiatrists; psychologists; cardiologists; chemists; (radio)physicists; computer scientists; programmers and systems analysts; biomedical, clinical, electrical and other engineers; teachers of medical informatics and users of educational software.