{"title":"Motor asymmetry in Parkinson’s disease: Diagnostic thresholds based on clinical scores and DaTSCAN imaging","authors":"Philippe Voruz , Julie Péron","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Motor asymmetry is a key feature of Parkinson’s disease that can influence disease progression and patient outcomes. However, there is currently no consensus on the best method or clear thresholds to determine motor asymmetry, which limits the ability to standardize its assessment across studies. This work aimed to determine which motor asymmetry score − standardized or non-standardized − best predicts dopaminergic damage in the putamen, as measured by DaTSCAN, and to establish clear thresholds for distinguishing symmetric from asymmetric profiles. Data from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative were utilized for the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis. Both motor asymmetry scores significantly predicted dopaminergic asymmetry, with the non-standardized score showing a slightly higher predictive power (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.621, p < 0.001) compared to the standardized score (AUC = 0.569, p = 0.018). For the non-standardized score, a cut-off of ± 2.50 yielded a sensitivity of 0.874 and specificity of 0.783. In contrast, the standardized score achieved a cut-off of ± 0.188, resulting in a sensitivity of 0.908 and specificity of 0.823. These findings underscore the importance of motor asymmetry in clinical evaluations of Parkinson’s disease and provide a foundation for further research aimed at refining diagnostic thresholds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100350"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590112525000544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Motor asymmetry is a key feature of Parkinson’s disease that can influence disease progression and patient outcomes. However, there is currently no consensus on the best method or clear thresholds to determine motor asymmetry, which limits the ability to standardize its assessment across studies. This work aimed to determine which motor asymmetry score − standardized or non-standardized − best predicts dopaminergic damage in the putamen, as measured by DaTSCAN, and to establish clear thresholds for distinguishing symmetric from asymmetric profiles. Data from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative were utilized for the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis. Both motor asymmetry scores significantly predicted dopaminergic asymmetry, with the non-standardized score showing a slightly higher predictive power (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.621, p < 0.001) compared to the standardized score (AUC = 0.569, p = 0.018). For the non-standardized score, a cut-off of ± 2.50 yielded a sensitivity of 0.874 and specificity of 0.783. In contrast, the standardized score achieved a cut-off of ± 0.188, resulting in a sensitivity of 0.908 and specificity of 0.823. These findings underscore the importance of motor asymmetry in clinical evaluations of Parkinson’s disease and provide a foundation for further research aimed at refining diagnostic thresholds.
运动不对称是帕金森病的一个关键特征,可以影响疾病进展和患者预后。然而,目前尚无确定运动不对称的最佳方法或明确阈值的共识,这限制了在研究中标准化其评估的能力。这项工作旨在确定哪种运动不对称评分-标准化或非标准化-最能预测壳核中多巴胺能损伤,并建立明确的阈值来区分对称和不对称的特征。来自帕金森进展标志物计划的数据被用于受试者工作特征曲线分析。两项运动不对称得分均能显著预测多巴胺能不对称,其中非标准化得分的预测能力略高(曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.621, p <;0.001),与标准化评分相比(AUC = 0.569, p = 0.018)。对于非标准化评分,截止值为±2.50,敏感性为0.874,特异性为0.783。标准化评分的截止值为±0.188,敏感性为0.908,特异性为0.823。这些发现强调了运动不对称性在帕金森病临床评估中的重要性,并为进一步研究提供了基础,旨在提高诊断阈值。