Effects of Depression and/or Anxiety on the Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Tears: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up Study.

Roger Quesada-Jimenez,Elizabeth G Walsh,Jessica C Keane,Ady H Kahana-Rojkind,Elijah S Domb,Benjamin G Domb
{"title":"Effects of Depression and/or Anxiety on the Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Tears: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up Study.","authors":"Roger Quesada-Jimenez,Elizabeth G Walsh,Jessica C Keane,Ady H Kahana-Rojkind,Elijah S Domb,Benjamin G Domb","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.01054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nDepression and anxiety are recognized as adverse prognostic factors in various orthopaedic surgical interventions. The aim of this study is to report the intermediate-term outcomes of hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tears in patients with depression and/or anxiety.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nData were retrospectively analyzed for patients with a self-reported history of depression and/or anxiety who had undergone primary hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAI and labral tears from 2008 to 2018. Included patients had at least 1 of the following patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores: the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sports-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), patient satisfaction, Short Form 12-Mental (SF-M), Veterans RAND 12 Item-Mental (VR-M), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, or a revision procedure during the study period. Patients were propensity-matched with a benchmark control group of patients without depression and/or anxiety, in a 1:1 ratio, to control for confounding variables. Clinically relevant thresholds, revision procedures, and survivorship rates were also included in the analysis.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOne hundred and twenty-five hips in patients with depression and/or anxiety were included in the study and were successfully matched to 125 control hips in patients without depression and/or anxiety. The depression/anxiety cohort demonstrated significant improvement in all functional outcome scores, with a magnitude of improvement that was comparable with that in the control group. However, the depression/anxiety group started with significantly lower preoperative scores for the HOS-SSS, SF-M, and VR-M; ended with lower intermediate-term scores for the mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, SF-M, and VR-M; and had lower rates of achievement of patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds for the mHHS and HOS-SSS. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to secondary procedures and complications.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nHip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAI and labral tears in patients with depression and/or anxiety resulted in significant intermediate-term improvements in functional and health-related quality-of-life scales. However, compared with a benchmark control group, the functional scores in this patient population started lower and ended lower. In addition, the patients in the depression/anxiety cohort had a lower rate of achieving PASS thresholds than those in the control group.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nPrognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.01054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Depression and anxiety are recognized as adverse prognostic factors in various orthopaedic surgical interventions. The aim of this study is to report the intermediate-term outcomes of hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tears in patients with depression and/or anxiety. METHODS Data were retrospectively analyzed for patients with a self-reported history of depression and/or anxiety who had undergone primary hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAI and labral tears from 2008 to 2018. Included patients had at least 1 of the following patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores: the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sports-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), patient satisfaction, Short Form 12-Mental (SF-M), Veterans RAND 12 Item-Mental (VR-M), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, or a revision procedure during the study period. Patients were propensity-matched with a benchmark control group of patients without depression and/or anxiety, in a 1:1 ratio, to control for confounding variables. Clinically relevant thresholds, revision procedures, and survivorship rates were also included in the analysis. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-five hips in patients with depression and/or anxiety were included in the study and were successfully matched to 125 control hips in patients without depression and/or anxiety. The depression/anxiety cohort demonstrated significant improvement in all functional outcome scores, with a magnitude of improvement that was comparable with that in the control group. However, the depression/anxiety group started with significantly lower preoperative scores for the HOS-SSS, SF-M, and VR-M; ended with lower intermediate-term scores for the mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, SF-M, and VR-M; and had lower rates of achievement of patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds for the mHHS and HOS-SSS. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with regard to secondary procedures and complications. CONCLUSIONS Hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAI and labral tears in patients with depression and/or anxiety resulted in significant intermediate-term improvements in functional and health-related quality-of-life scales. However, compared with a benchmark control group, the functional scores in this patient population started lower and ended lower. In addition, the patients in the depression/anxiety cohort had a lower rate of achieving PASS thresholds than those in the control group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
抑郁和/或焦虑对髋关节镜治疗股髋臼撞击和唇撕裂的结果的影响:一项至少5年的随访研究
背景:在各种骨科手术干预中,抑郁和焦虑被认为是不良预后因素。本研究的目的是报告髋关节镜治疗抑郁和/或焦虑患者的股髋臼撞击(FAI)和唇裂的中期结果。方法回顾性分析2008年至2018年接受原发性髋关节镜治疗FAI和唇部撕裂的自我报告抑郁和/或焦虑史患者的数据。纳入的患者至少具有以下患者报告结果(PRO)评分中的1项:改良Harris髋关节评分(mHHS)、非关节炎髋关节评分(NAHS)、髋关节结果评分-运动特异性亚量表(HOS-SSS)、国际髋关节结果工具(iHOT-12)、患者满意度、短表12-心理(SF-M)、退伍军人RAND 12项目-心理(VR-M)和疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS),或在研究期间进行修订程序。患者与无抑郁和/或焦虑的基准对照组以1:1的比例进行倾向匹配,以控制混杂变量。临床相关阈值、修订程序和生存率也包括在分析中。结果125名抑郁和/或焦虑患者的髋部被纳入研究,并成功匹配125名无抑郁和/或焦虑患者的对照髋部。抑郁/焦虑组在所有功能结果评分上均有显著改善,其改善幅度与对照组相当。然而,抑郁/焦虑组开始时HOS-SSS、SF-M和VR-M的术前评分明显较低;mHHS、NAHS、HOS-SSS、SF-M和VR-M的中期评分较低;并且在mHHS和HOS-SSS中达到患者可接受症状状态(PASS)阈值的比率较低。在二次手术和并发症方面,两组间无显著差异。结论:关节镜治疗伴有抑郁和/或焦虑的FAI和唇部撕裂患者在功能和健康相关生活质量量表上有显著的中期改善。然而,与基准对照组相比,该患者群体的功能评分开始较低,结束较低。此外,抑郁/焦虑组患者达到PASS阈值的比率低于对照组。证据水平:预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信