RECOVER: Toward Requirements Generation From Stakeholders’ Conversations

IF 6.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Gianmario Voria;Francesco Casillo;Carmine Gravino;Gemma Catolino;Fabio Palomba
{"title":"RECOVER: Toward Requirements Generation From Stakeholders’ Conversations","authors":"Gianmario Voria;Francesco Casillo;Carmine Gravino;Gemma Catolino;Fabio Palomba","doi":"10.1109/TSE.2025.3572056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stakeholders’ conversations requirements elicitation meetings hold valuable insights into system and client needs. However, manually extracting requirements is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to errors and biases. While current state-of-the-art methods assist in summarizing stakeholder conversations and classifying requirements based on their nature, there is a noticeable lack of approaches capable of both identifying requirements within these conversations and generating corresponding system requirements. These approaches would assist requirement identification, reducing engineers’ workload, time, and effort. They would also enhance accuracy and consistency in documentation, providing a reliable foundation for further analysis. To address this gap, this paper introduces <sc>RECOVER</small> (Requirements EliCitation frOm conVERsations), a novel conversational requirements engineering approach that leverages natural language processing and large language models (LLMs) to support practitioners in automatically extracting system requirements from stakeholder interactions by analyzing individual conversation turns. The approach is evaluated using a mixed-method research design that combines statistical performance analysis with a user study involving requirements engineers, targeting two levels of granularity. First, at the conversation turn level, the evaluation measures <sc>RECOVER</small>’s accuracy in identifying requirements-relevant dialogue and the quality of generated requirements in terms of correctness, completeness, and actionability. Second, at the entire conversation level, the evaluation assesses the overall usefulness and effectiveness of <sc>RECOVER</small> in synthesizing comprehensive system requirements from full stakeholder discussions. Empirical evaluation of <sc>RECOVER</small> shows promising performance, with generated requirements demonstrating satisfactory correctness, completeness, and actionability. The results also highlight the potential of automating requirements elicitation from conversations as an aid that enhances efficiency while maintaining human oversight.","PeriodicalId":13324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","volume":"51 6","pages":"1912-1933"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11008757/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stakeholders’ conversations requirements elicitation meetings hold valuable insights into system and client needs. However, manually extracting requirements is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to errors and biases. While current state-of-the-art methods assist in summarizing stakeholder conversations and classifying requirements based on their nature, there is a noticeable lack of approaches capable of both identifying requirements within these conversations and generating corresponding system requirements. These approaches would assist requirement identification, reducing engineers’ workload, time, and effort. They would also enhance accuracy and consistency in documentation, providing a reliable foundation for further analysis. To address this gap, this paper introduces RECOVER (Requirements EliCitation frOm conVERsations), a novel conversational requirements engineering approach that leverages natural language processing and large language models (LLMs) to support practitioners in automatically extracting system requirements from stakeholder interactions by analyzing individual conversation turns. The approach is evaluated using a mixed-method research design that combines statistical performance analysis with a user study involving requirements engineers, targeting two levels of granularity. First, at the conversation turn level, the evaluation measures RECOVER’s accuracy in identifying requirements-relevant dialogue and the quality of generated requirements in terms of correctness, completeness, and actionability. Second, at the entire conversation level, the evaluation assesses the overall usefulness and effectiveness of RECOVER in synthesizing comprehensive system requirements from full stakeholder discussions. Empirical evaluation of RECOVER shows promising performance, with generated requirements demonstrating satisfactory correctness, completeness, and actionability. The results also highlight the potential of automating requirements elicitation from conversations as an aid that enhances efficiency while maintaining human oversight.
恢复:从涉众的对话中生成需求
涉众的对话、需求引出会议对系统和客户的需求提供了有价值的见解。然而,手动提取需求是耗时的、劳动密集型的,并且容易出现错误和偏差。虽然当前最先进的方法有助于总结涉众的对话,并根据它们的性质对需求进行分类,但是明显缺乏既能识别这些对话中的需求,又能生成相应系统需求的方法。这些方法将有助于需求识别,减少工程师的工作量、时间和努力。它们还将提高文件的准确性和一致性,为进一步分析提供可靠的基础。为了解决这一差距,本文介绍了RECOVER(从对话中获取需求),这是一种新颖的会话需求工程方法,它利用自然语言处理和大型语言模型(llm)来支持从业者通过分析单个会话转向,从涉众交互中自动提取系统需求。该方法使用混合方法研究设计进行评估,该设计将统计性能分析与涉及需求工程师的用户研究相结合,目标为两个粒度级别。首先,在会话回合级别,评估在识别需求相关对话和根据正确性、完整性和可操作性生成的需求的质量方面度量RECOVER的准确性。其次,在整个对话层面,评估评估了RECOVER在综合来自完整涉众讨论的综合系统需求方面的总体有用性和有效性。对RECOVER的经验评估显示了良好的性能,生成的需求显示了令人满意的正确性、完整性和可操作性。结果还强调了从对话中自动提取需求的潜力,作为在保持人类监督的同时提高效率的辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
10.80%
发文量
724
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering seeks contributions comprising well-defined theoretical results and empirical studies with potential impacts on software construction, analysis, or management. The scope of this Transactions extends from fundamental mechanisms to the development of principles and their application in specific environments. Specific topic areas include: a) Development and maintenance methods and models: Techniques and principles for specifying, designing, and implementing software systems, encompassing notations and process models. b) Assessment methods: Software tests, validation, reliability models, test and diagnosis procedures, software redundancy, design for error control, and measurements and evaluation of process and product aspects. c) Software project management: Productivity factors, cost models, schedule and organizational issues, and standards. d) Tools and environments: Specific tools, integrated tool environments, associated architectures, databases, and parallel and distributed processing issues. e) System issues: Hardware-software trade-offs. f) State-of-the-art surveys: Syntheses and comprehensive reviews of the historical development within specific areas of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信