Safety rounds as a strategy for continuous quality and safety improvement in healthcare processes.

IF 2.2
Julio J Lopez-Picazo, Inmaculada Vidal-Abarca, Juana M Marín-Martínez, Mercedes López-Ibáñez
{"title":"Safety rounds as a strategy for continuous quality and safety improvement in healthcare processes.","authors":"Julio J Lopez-Picazo, Inmaculada Vidal-Abarca, Juana M Marín-Martínez, Mercedes López-Ibáñez","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Safety rounds (SR) emerged as a tool to engage healthcare leaders in patient safety, inspired by the LEAN 'Gemba' visits. While SRs have shown potential to improve safety culture and clinical practices, their effectiveness varies. Success depends on engaged leadership, regular implementation, and a focus on continuous improvement, involving staff in identifying and addressing safety issues. However, evidence on SRs effectiveness remains fragmented. This study aims to design, implement, and evaluate a strategy for using SRs to improve quality and safety in healthcare processes within an integrated health area, contributing to the global understanding of SR adaptation across different healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A five-year quasi-experimental pre-post study was conducted (2018-2023) in a Spanish integrated healthcare area. A multidisciplinary group designed and deployed SRs in five key care settings: Primary Care, Outpatient Consultation, Emergency Services, Hospitalization, and Surgery. SRs were structured in four stages: team formation, indicator assessment, improvement proposal, and dissemination of results. A total of 41 SRs were conducted, assessing 122 indicators. Measurements included the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS) and patient safety incident reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>41 SRs were conducted across 5 clinical settings, with an average compliance rate of 71% for assessed indicators. Of the 122 indicators assessed, 87 (71%) met the standard compliance threshold. The number of safety incident reports increased by 27% from 2017 to 2023. Significant improvements were noted in 'Management Support for Patient Safety' and 'Feedback and Communication', while decreases occurred in dimensions such as 'Perception of Safety'.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>SR, when systematically designed, can improve safety culture and healthcare quality, particularly in communication and leadership. Declines in some dimensions indicate a need for continuous refinement of SR strategies. Further research is needed to optimize SR impact across diverse contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":520651,"journal":{"name":"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Safety rounds (SR) emerged as a tool to engage healthcare leaders in patient safety, inspired by the LEAN 'Gemba' visits. While SRs have shown potential to improve safety culture and clinical practices, their effectiveness varies. Success depends on engaged leadership, regular implementation, and a focus on continuous improvement, involving staff in identifying and addressing safety issues. However, evidence on SRs effectiveness remains fragmented. This study aims to design, implement, and evaluate a strategy for using SRs to improve quality and safety in healthcare processes within an integrated health area, contributing to the global understanding of SR adaptation across different healthcare settings.

Methods: A five-year quasi-experimental pre-post study was conducted (2018-2023) in a Spanish integrated healthcare area. A multidisciplinary group designed and deployed SRs in five key care settings: Primary Care, Outpatient Consultation, Emergency Services, Hospitalization, and Surgery. SRs were structured in four stages: team formation, indicator assessment, improvement proposal, and dissemination of results. A total of 41 SRs were conducted, assessing 122 indicators. Measurements included the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS) and patient safety incident reports.

Results: 41 SRs were conducted across 5 clinical settings, with an average compliance rate of 71% for assessed indicators. Of the 122 indicators assessed, 87 (71%) met the standard compliance threshold. The number of safety incident reports increased by 27% from 2017 to 2023. Significant improvements were noted in 'Management Support for Patient Safety' and 'Feedback and Communication', while decreases occurred in dimensions such as 'Perception of Safety'.

Discussion: SR, when systematically designed, can improve safety culture and healthcare quality, particularly in communication and leadership. Declines in some dimensions indicate a need for continuous refinement of SR strategies. Further research is needed to optimize SR impact across diverse contexts.

安全轮询作为医疗保健流程中持续质量和安全改进的策略。
简介:受精益“玄场”访问的启发,安全查房(SR)成为一种让医疗保健领导者参与患者安全的工具。虽然SRs已显示出改善安全文化和临床实践的潜力,但其有效性各不相同。成功取决于积极参与的领导、定期的实施和对持续改进的关注,让员工参与识别和解决安全问题。然而,关于可持续发展战略有效性的证据仍然不完整。本研究旨在设计、实施和评估一项战略,以利用特殊需求来提高综合医疗领域医疗流程的质量和安全性,从而促进对不同医疗环境下特殊需求适应的全球理解。方法:在西班牙某综合医疗保健区进行为期5年(2018-2023)的准实验前后研究。一个多学科小组在五个关键护理环境中设计和部署了SRs:初级保健、门诊咨询、急诊服务、住院和外科。SRs的结构分为四个阶段:团队组建、指标评估、改进建议和结果传播。总共进行了41次战略研究,评估了122个指标。测量方法包括医院患者安全文化调查(hsop)和患者安全事件报告。结果:在5个临床环境中进行了41次SRs,评估指标的平均依从率为71%。在评估的122项指标中,87项(71%)达到标准符合性阈值。从2017年到2023年,安全事故报告的数量增加了27%。在“对患者安全的管理支持”和“反馈和沟通”方面取得了重大进展,而在“安全感知”等方面则有所下降。讨论:当系统地设计时,SR可以改善安全文化和医疗质量,特别是在沟通和领导方面。某些维度的下降表明需要不断改进SR策略。需要进一步的研究来优化SR在不同背景下的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信