Darius Ansari, Heba Maghrabi, Asma Eslami, Amgad S Hanna
{"title":"Rib-Sparing Anterior Scalenectomy Versus First Rib Resection for the Treatment of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.","authors":"Darius Ansari, Heba Maghrabi, Asma Eslami, Amgad S Hanna","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Thoracic outlet syndrome is a group of disorders resulting from dynamic compression of the brachial plexus, subclavian artery, and/or subclavian vein. Patients who experience progressive symptoms despite conservative measures may benefit from surgical decompression, which is most commonly performed via first rib resection or resection of the anterior scalene muscle. Prior studies have suggested lower morbidity associated with rib-sparing scalenectomy, although few direct comparisons exist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing first-time thoracic outlet decompression at our institution. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: those who underwent first rib resection by any of 4 approaches and those undergoing rib-sparing anterior scalenectomy. Paired t-tests and the χ2 test were used to compare baseline comorbidities, rates of perioperative complications, and pain relief at 90-day follow-up. We hypothesized that the rates of complications would be higher in those undergoing first rib resection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 191 patients met eligibility criteria, 112 who underwent rib-sparing anterior scalenectomy, and 79 who underwent first rib excision. Anterior scalenectomy procedures were associated with greater odds of transient phrenic nerve palsy. First rib resection was associated with higher rates of pleural injury, postoperative pneumothorax, nerve transection injuries, and vascular injuries. The rate of any complication was higher in first rib resection compared with anterior scalenectomy (53.2% vs 8.9%, P < .01), a finding which persisted on a subgroup analysis comparing supraclavicular rib resection to anterior scalenectomy. Rates of future redo thoracic outlet decompression were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>First rib resection is associated with higher rates of complications compared with rib-sparing anterior scalenectomy, driven primarily by pleural injury and nerve injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Thoracic outlet syndrome is a group of disorders resulting from dynamic compression of the brachial plexus, subclavian artery, and/or subclavian vein. Patients who experience progressive symptoms despite conservative measures may benefit from surgical decompression, which is most commonly performed via first rib resection or resection of the anterior scalene muscle. Prior studies have suggested lower morbidity associated with rib-sparing scalenectomy, although few direct comparisons exist.
Methods: Retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing first-time thoracic outlet decompression at our institution. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: those who underwent first rib resection by any of 4 approaches and those undergoing rib-sparing anterior scalenectomy. Paired t-tests and the χ2 test were used to compare baseline comorbidities, rates of perioperative complications, and pain relief at 90-day follow-up. We hypothesized that the rates of complications would be higher in those undergoing first rib resection.
Results: A total of 191 patients met eligibility criteria, 112 who underwent rib-sparing anterior scalenectomy, and 79 who underwent first rib excision. Anterior scalenectomy procedures were associated with greater odds of transient phrenic nerve palsy. First rib resection was associated with higher rates of pleural injury, postoperative pneumothorax, nerve transection injuries, and vascular injuries. The rate of any complication was higher in first rib resection compared with anterior scalenectomy (53.2% vs 8.9%, P < .01), a finding which persisted on a subgroup analysis comparing supraclavicular rib resection to anterior scalenectomy. Rates of future redo thoracic outlet decompression were similar between groups.
Conclusion: First rib resection is associated with higher rates of complications compared with rib-sparing anterior scalenectomy, driven primarily by pleural injury and nerve injuries.
背景和目的:胸廓出口综合征是由臂丛、锁骨下动脉和/或锁骨下静脉的动态压迫引起的一组疾病。尽管采取了保守措施,但仍出现进行性症状的患者可能受益于手术减压,手术减压最常通过第一肋骨切除术或前斜角肌切除术进行。先前的研究表明保留肋骨的斜角切除术的发病率较低,尽管很少有直接的比较存在。方法:对我院首次行胸廓出口减压术的患者进行回顾性队列研究。患者被分为2组:通过4种入路中的任何一种进行第一肋骨切除术的患者和接受保留肋骨的前斜角切除术的患者。采用配对t检验和χ2检验比较90天随访时基线合并症、围手术期并发症发生率和疼痛缓解情况。我们假设在第一肋骨切除术中并发症的发生率会更高。结果:共有191例患者符合入选标准,其中112例行保留前斜角肌切除术,79例行第一肋骨切除术。前斜角肌切除术与短暂性膈神经麻痹的可能性较大相关。第一肋骨切除术与胸膜损伤、术后气胸、神经横断损伤和血管损伤的发生率较高相关。与前斜角肌切除术相比,第一肋骨切除术的并发症发生率更高(53.2% vs 8.9%, P < 0.01),这一发现在比较锁骨上肋骨切除术和前斜角肌切除术的亚组分析中仍然存在。两组间再次进行胸廓出口减压的比率相似。结论:与保留肋骨的前斜角肌切除术相比,第一肋骨切除术的并发症发生率更高,主要是由于胸膜损伤和神经损伤。