Yonghun Kim, Jeong Min Lee, Jee Hyun Baek, Tae Won Choi, Jinoo Kim, Je Hwan Won, Yohan Kwon
{"title":"Use of a Reentry Device for Endovascular Recanalization of Central Venous Occlusions Associated With Failing Hemodialysis Access.","authors":"Yonghun Kim, Jeong Min Lee, Jee Hyun Baek, Tae Won Choi, Jinoo Kim, Je Hwan Won, Yohan Kwon","doi":"10.1111/hdi.13262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of a reentry device for endovascular recanalization of central venous occlusions associated with dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2013 and December 2023, 20 patients (13 women; mean age, 61.1 years) with dysfunctional fistulas attributed to central venous occlusion underwent treatment using an Outback LTD reentry device. All patients had experienced unsuccessful recanalization attempts using conventional endovascular techniques. Symptoms included increased venous pressure during hemodialysis (N = 8), arm swelling (N = 8), absence of flow (N = 1), graft thrombosis (N = 2), and maturation failure (N = 1). The mean age of the fistulas was 56.1 months, and 11 patients had a history of angioplasty. An Outback LTD reentry device was used when conventional endovascular techniques were unsuccessful.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Occlusions were observed at the junction of the subclavian and innominate veins (N = 15) and in the right innominate vein (N = 2), subclavian vein (N = 1), and axillary vein of the arm (N = 2). The reentry device was introduced via the fistula (N = 11), femoral vein (N = 8), or internal jugular vein (N = 1). Technical success was achieved in 18 patients (90.0%), all of whom successfully underwent hemodialysis. Eight patients with arm swelling experienced symptom relief. In the 14 patients available for long-term follow-up, the mean intervention-free period was 5.0 months, and the mean functional period of the fistula, with or without subsequent endovascular treatment, was 23.0 months. No complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>An Outback reentry device may be used for central venous occlusions when conventional techniques are unsuccessful.</p>","PeriodicalId":94027,"journal":{"name":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.13262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: To evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of a reentry device for endovascular recanalization of central venous occlusions associated with dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas.
Methods: Between January 2013 and December 2023, 20 patients (13 women; mean age, 61.1 years) with dysfunctional fistulas attributed to central venous occlusion underwent treatment using an Outback LTD reentry device. All patients had experienced unsuccessful recanalization attempts using conventional endovascular techniques. Symptoms included increased venous pressure during hemodialysis (N = 8), arm swelling (N = 8), absence of flow (N = 1), graft thrombosis (N = 2), and maturation failure (N = 1). The mean age of the fistulas was 56.1 months, and 11 patients had a history of angioplasty. An Outback LTD reentry device was used when conventional endovascular techniques were unsuccessful.
Findings: Occlusions were observed at the junction of the subclavian and innominate veins (N = 15) and in the right innominate vein (N = 2), subclavian vein (N = 1), and axillary vein of the arm (N = 2). The reentry device was introduced via the fistula (N = 11), femoral vein (N = 8), or internal jugular vein (N = 1). Technical success was achieved in 18 patients (90.0%), all of whom successfully underwent hemodialysis. Eight patients with arm swelling experienced symptom relief. In the 14 patients available for long-term follow-up, the mean intervention-free period was 5.0 months, and the mean functional period of the fistula, with or without subsequent endovascular treatment, was 23.0 months. No complications were observed.
Discussion: An Outback reentry device may be used for central venous occlusions when conventional techniques are unsuccessful.