Use of a Reentry Device for Endovascular Recanalization of Central Venous Occlusions Associated With Failing Hemodialysis Access.

Yonghun Kim, Jeong Min Lee, Jee Hyun Baek, Tae Won Choi, Jinoo Kim, Je Hwan Won, Yohan Kwon
{"title":"Use of a Reentry Device for Endovascular Recanalization of Central Venous Occlusions Associated With Failing Hemodialysis Access.","authors":"Yonghun Kim, Jeong Min Lee, Jee Hyun Baek, Tae Won Choi, Jinoo Kim, Je Hwan Won, Yohan Kwon","doi":"10.1111/hdi.13262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of a reentry device for endovascular recanalization of central venous occlusions associated with dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2013 and December 2023, 20 patients (13 women; mean age, 61.1 years) with dysfunctional fistulas attributed to central venous occlusion underwent treatment using an Outback LTD reentry device. All patients had experienced unsuccessful recanalization attempts using conventional endovascular techniques. Symptoms included increased venous pressure during hemodialysis (N = 8), arm swelling (N = 8), absence of flow (N = 1), graft thrombosis (N = 2), and maturation failure (N = 1). The mean age of the fistulas was 56.1 months, and 11 patients had a history of angioplasty. An Outback LTD reentry device was used when conventional endovascular techniques were unsuccessful.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Occlusions were observed at the junction of the subclavian and innominate veins (N = 15) and in the right innominate vein (N = 2), subclavian vein (N = 1), and axillary vein of the arm (N = 2). The reentry device was introduced via the fistula (N = 11), femoral vein (N = 8), or internal jugular vein (N = 1). Technical success was achieved in 18 patients (90.0%), all of whom successfully underwent hemodialysis. Eight patients with arm swelling experienced symptom relief. In the 14 patients available for long-term follow-up, the mean intervention-free period was 5.0 months, and the mean functional period of the fistula, with or without subsequent endovascular treatment, was 23.0 months. No complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>An Outback reentry device may be used for central venous occlusions when conventional techniques are unsuccessful.</p>","PeriodicalId":94027,"journal":{"name":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.13262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of a reentry device for endovascular recanalization of central venous occlusions associated with dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas.

Methods: Between January 2013 and December 2023, 20 patients (13 women; mean age, 61.1 years) with dysfunctional fistulas attributed to central venous occlusion underwent treatment using an Outback LTD reentry device. All patients had experienced unsuccessful recanalization attempts using conventional endovascular techniques. Symptoms included increased venous pressure during hemodialysis (N = 8), arm swelling (N = 8), absence of flow (N = 1), graft thrombosis (N = 2), and maturation failure (N = 1). The mean age of the fistulas was 56.1 months, and 11 patients had a history of angioplasty. An Outback LTD reentry device was used when conventional endovascular techniques were unsuccessful.

Findings: Occlusions were observed at the junction of the subclavian and innominate veins (N = 15) and in the right innominate vein (N = 2), subclavian vein (N = 1), and axillary vein of the arm (N = 2). The reentry device was introduced via the fistula (N = 11), femoral vein (N = 8), or internal jugular vein (N = 1). Technical success was achieved in 18 patients (90.0%), all of whom successfully underwent hemodialysis. Eight patients with arm swelling experienced symptom relief. In the 14 patients available for long-term follow-up, the mean intervention-free period was 5.0 months, and the mean functional period of the fistula, with or without subsequent endovascular treatment, was 23.0 months. No complications were observed.

Discussion: An Outback reentry device may be used for central venous occlusions when conventional techniques are unsuccessful.

再入装置在血液透析通路失败相关中心静脉闭塞血管内再通中的应用。
目的:评价一种再入装置用于功能不全动静脉瘘相关中心静脉闭塞血管内再通的技术可行性和安全性。方法:2013年1月至2023年12月,20例患者(女性13例;平均年龄61.1岁),中心静脉闭塞导致功能不全瘘管,使用Outback LTD再入装置治疗。所有患者均经历了常规血管内技术再通失败的尝试。症状包括血液透析期间静脉压升高(N = 8),手臂肿胀(N = 8),血流缺失(N = 1),移植物血栓形成(N = 2)和成熟失败(N = 1)。患者平均年龄56.1个月,11例患者有血管成形术史。当常规血管内技术失败时,使用Outback LTD再入装置。结果:锁骨下静脉与无名静脉交界处(N = 15)、右侧无名静脉(N = 2)、锁骨下静脉(N = 1)、上臂腋静脉(N = 2)闭塞。再入装置经瘘管(N = 11)、股静脉(N = 8)或颈内静脉(N = 1)置入。18例患者(90.0%)获得技术成功,均成功进行了血液透析。8例手臂肿胀患者症状缓解。在14例可长期随访的患者中,平均无干预期为5.0个月,平均瘘功能期为23.0个月,无论是否进行后续血管内治疗。无并发症发生。讨论:当常规技术不成功时,可使用Outback再入装置治疗中心静脉阻塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信