I fear you're getting too close: neural correlates of personal space violation in paranoia.

IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Mélodie Derome, Frauke Conring, Nicole Gangl, Adamantini Hatzipanayioti, Florian Wüthrich, Maximilian Rüter, Stephanie Lefebvre, Sebastian Walther, Katharina Stegmayer
{"title":"I fear you're getting too close: neural correlates of personal space violation in paranoia.","authors":"Mélodie Derome, Frauke Conring, Nicole Gangl, Adamantini Hatzipanayioti, Florian Wüthrich, Maximilian Rüter, Stephanie Lefebvre, Sebastian Walther, Katharina Stegmayer","doi":"10.1038/s41537-025-00625-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increased personal space (PS) is a clinically relevant marker for paranoia. Neuroimaging evidence suggested limbic and prefrontal circuit alterations related to threat processing and emotion regulation (i.e., amygdala, fronto-parietal cortex). We hypothesize that patients with paranoia will respond with altered activation in PS-relevant brain areas (i.e., limbic regions, fronto-parietal cortex) toward personal space intrusion. We included 79 participants with various degrees of paranoia severity; 49 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and 30 controls. In this fMRI study, participants passively viewed pictures of facial expressions in approaching, static, or retracting motions. Violation of PS was modelled with the approaching faces condition. We used firstly a cut off to separate patients in high and low paranoia, and secondly the continuous variations of paranoia severity to understand the full picture. While participants were passively watching faces approaching them in contrast to static faces, group comparison revealed that patients with high paranoia showed hypoactivity mainly in the OFC when compared to patients with low paranoia, and hypoactivity in dlPFC and dPCC when compared to controls. Further, paranoia severity was positively associated with activation of the right hippocampus. Altered neural activity in the OFC, dlPFC, and hippocampus may well reflect the neural responses to the paranoid experience of threat and provide evidence for the hypothesized association between limbic dysfunction and paranoid threat. Modelling of paranoia severity captures variance in neural response to approaching threat, which may be previously undetected due to heterogeneity when examined at the group level.</p>","PeriodicalId":74758,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":"11 1","pages":"77"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12092760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-025-00625-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increased personal space (PS) is a clinically relevant marker for paranoia. Neuroimaging evidence suggested limbic and prefrontal circuit alterations related to threat processing and emotion regulation (i.e., amygdala, fronto-parietal cortex). We hypothesize that patients with paranoia will respond with altered activation in PS-relevant brain areas (i.e., limbic regions, fronto-parietal cortex) toward personal space intrusion. We included 79 participants with various degrees of paranoia severity; 49 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and 30 controls. In this fMRI study, participants passively viewed pictures of facial expressions in approaching, static, or retracting motions. Violation of PS was modelled with the approaching faces condition. We used firstly a cut off to separate patients in high and low paranoia, and secondly the continuous variations of paranoia severity to understand the full picture. While participants were passively watching faces approaching them in contrast to static faces, group comparison revealed that patients with high paranoia showed hypoactivity mainly in the OFC when compared to patients with low paranoia, and hypoactivity in dlPFC and dPCC when compared to controls. Further, paranoia severity was positively associated with activation of the right hippocampus. Altered neural activity in the OFC, dlPFC, and hippocampus may well reflect the neural responses to the paranoid experience of threat and provide evidence for the hypothesized association between limbic dysfunction and paranoid threat. Modelling of paranoia severity captures variance in neural response to approaching threat, which may be previously undetected due to heterogeneity when examined at the group level.

恐怕你说得太近了妄想症中侵犯个人空间的神经关联。
增加个人空间(PS)是偏执狂的临床相关标志。神经影像学证据表明,边缘和前额叶回路的改变与威胁处理和情绪调节有关(即杏仁核、额顶叶皮层)。我们假设偏执狂患者对个人空间入侵的反应会改变ps相关脑区(即边缘区,额顶叶皮质)的激活。我们纳入了79名不同程度偏执严重程度的参与者;49名被诊断为精神分裂症的患者和30名对照组。在这项功能磁共振成像研究中,参与者被动地观看接近、静止或收缩运动中的面部表情图片。利用逼近面条件对PS的违反进行了建模。我们首先使用截断来区分高妄想症和低妄想症患者,其次使用持续变化的妄想症严重程度来了解全貌。与静态面孔相比,当参与者被动地观看接近他们的面孔时,组间比较显示,与低偏执狂患者相比,高偏执狂患者主要在OFC表现出低活动,与对照组相比,dlPFC和dPCC表现出低活动。此外,偏执狂的严重程度与右侧海马体的激活呈正相关。OFC、dlPFC和海马体神经活动的改变可能很好地反映了对偏执威胁体验的神经反应,并为边缘功能障碍与偏执威胁之间的假设关联提供了证据。妄想症严重程度的建模捕获了神经反应对接近威胁的差异,这可能是以前在小组水平上检查时由于异质性而未被发现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信