Indications and outcomes of revision total ankle arthroplasty.

Kevin A Wu, Albert T Anastasio, Joshua A Wu, Julia Ralph, Crystal Jing, Alexandra N Krez, James K DeOrio
{"title":"Indications and outcomes of revision total ankle arthroplasty.","authors":"Kevin A Wu, Albert T Anastasio, Joshua A Wu, Julia Ralph, Crystal Jing, Alexandra N Krez, James K DeOrio","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2509770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has emerged as an alternative to ankle arthrodesis for managing end-stage ankle arthritis. However, the long-term survival of TAA remains inferior to that of hip and knee replacements, leading to a higher rate of revision TAA. Understanding the indications and outcomes of revision procedures is critical for orthopedic surgeons managing complex ankle pathology.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review explores the indications, surgical considerations, and outcomes associated with revision TAA. A structured literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus (January 2000-March 2024) with keywords including 'revision total ankle arthroplasty,' 'implant failure,' 'complications,' and 'biologic augmentation.'</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Revision TAA presents unique surgical and biomechanical challenges that require individualized treatment approaches. While it offers pain relief and functional restoration for select patients, outcomes remain less favorable compared to primary TAA. Future advancements in implant technology may improve long-term success rates. Additionally, optimizing patient selection criteria and perioperative protocols will be essential to reducing complications and enhancing outcomes. Further research is needed to refine revision techniques and establish guidelines for managing failed TAA effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2025.2509770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has emerged as an alternative to ankle arthrodesis for managing end-stage ankle arthritis. However, the long-term survival of TAA remains inferior to that of hip and knee replacements, leading to a higher rate of revision TAA. Understanding the indications and outcomes of revision procedures is critical for orthopedic surgeons managing complex ankle pathology.

Areas covered: This review explores the indications, surgical considerations, and outcomes associated with revision TAA. A structured literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus (January 2000-March 2024) with keywords including 'revision total ankle arthroplasty,' 'implant failure,' 'complications,' and 'biologic augmentation.'

Expert opinion: Revision TAA presents unique surgical and biomechanical challenges that require individualized treatment approaches. While it offers pain relief and functional restoration for select patients, outcomes remain less favorable compared to primary TAA. Future advancements in implant technology may improve long-term success rates. Additionally, optimizing patient selection criteria and perioperative protocols will be essential to reducing complications and enhancing outcomes. Further research is needed to refine revision techniques and establish guidelines for managing failed TAA effectively.

改良全踝关节置换术的适应症和结果。
简介:全踝关节置换术(TAA)已成为踝关节融合术治疗终末期踝关节关节炎的替代方法。然而,TAA的长期生存率仍然不如髋关节和膝关节置换术,这导致TAA翻修率更高。了解翻修手术的适应症和结果对骨科医生处理复杂的踝关节病理至关重要。涵盖领域:本综述探讨了与修订TAA相关的适应症、手术注意事项和结果。使用PubMed和Scopus进行结构化文献检索(2000年1月- 2024年3月),关键词包括“翻修全踝关节置换术”、“植入失败”、“并发症”和“生物增强”。专家意见:修订TAA提出了独特的外科和生物力学挑战,需要个性化的治疗方法。虽然它提供了疼痛缓解和功能恢复的选择患者,结果仍然不如初级TAA。未来植入技术的进步可能会提高长期成功率。此外,优化患者选择标准和围手术期方案对于减少并发症和提高预后至关重要。需要进一步的研究来完善修订技术和建立有效管理失败的TAA的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信