Kiran Jagannath Dange, Kanchan Bala Rathore, Bhushan A Darkase, Mayur R Moreker, Shekhar Nana Pradhan, Vasudha Abhijit Belgaumkar, Rohan R Thombare, Shivani K Shende
{"title":"Psychosocial impacts of ocular ailments and facial dermatoses in women: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kiran Jagannath Dange, Kanchan Bala Rathore, Bhushan A Darkase, Mayur R Moreker, Shekhar Nana Pradhan, Vasudha Abhijit Belgaumkar, Rohan R Thombare, Shivani K Shende","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2506018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was intended to evaluate the psychosocial impacts of ocular and facial ailments on women and to evaluate the efficiency of various interventions on psychological well-being and quality of life. The researcher conducted the study while adhering to the advocated reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 24 peer-reviewed articles from reputable databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus) and published starting January 1, 1990 to 2023 were included. Forest plots were used for data visualization, and fixed- and random-effects models were adopted for meta-analysis. There was observed significant improvement in self-esteem following intervention implementation (pooled effect size of 0.73, <i>p</i> < 0.001), body image (pooled effect size of 0.65, <i>p</i> < 0.001), reduction in anxiety levels post-intervention (pooled effect size of -0.56, <i>p</i> < 0.001), reduction in depression levels (pooled effect size of -0.48, <i>p</i> < 0.001), as well as improvement in overall quality of life (pooled effect size of 0.56, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Where relevant, odds ratios were noted from included studies but not the primary measure for the pooled effects. This study highlights the intricate interplay of individual, interpersonal, and environmental factors in shaping psychosocial outcomes and underscores the need for comprehensive care that addresses the multidimensional needs of affected women.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2506018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study was intended to evaluate the psychosocial impacts of ocular and facial ailments on women and to evaluate the efficiency of various interventions on psychological well-being and quality of life. The researcher conducted the study while adhering to the advocated reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 24 peer-reviewed articles from reputable databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus) and published starting January 1, 1990 to 2023 were included. Forest plots were used for data visualization, and fixed- and random-effects models were adopted for meta-analysis. There was observed significant improvement in self-esteem following intervention implementation (pooled effect size of 0.73, p < 0.001), body image (pooled effect size of 0.65, p < 0.001), reduction in anxiety levels post-intervention (pooled effect size of -0.56, p < 0.001), reduction in depression levels (pooled effect size of -0.48, p < 0.001), as well as improvement in overall quality of life (pooled effect size of 0.56, p < 0.001). Where relevant, odds ratios were noted from included studies but not the primary measure for the pooled effects. This study highlights the intricate interplay of individual, interpersonal, and environmental factors in shaping psychosocial outcomes and underscores the need for comprehensive care that addresses the multidimensional needs of affected women.
本研究旨在评估眼部和面部疾病对女性的心理社会影响，并评估各种干预措施对心理健康和生活质量的影响。研究者在坚持系统评价和meta分析（PRISMA）指南所提倡的报告项目的情况下进行了研究。共收录了来自知名数据库（PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane和Scopus）的24篇同行评议文章，这些文章发表于1990年1月1日至2023年。数据可视化采用森林图，meta分析采用固定效应和随机效应模型。干预实施后，观察到自尊有显著改善(合并效应量为0.73,p p p p p
期刊介绍：
Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management.
For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
