Investigation of Emergency Nurses in Detecting Foreign Bodies in Soft Tissues With Ultrasonography: A Manikin Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Turgay Yılmaz Kilic, Caner Saglam, Hasan Idil, Ejder Saylav Bora, Birdal Güllüpınar, Yesim Eyler, Huriye Akay, Gamze Şıracı
{"title":"Investigation of Emergency Nurses in Detecting Foreign Bodies in Soft Tissues With Ultrasonography: A Manikin Study.","authors":"Turgay Yılmaz Kilic, Caner Saglam, Hasan Idil, Ejder Saylav Bora, Birdal Güllüpınar, Yesim Eyler, Huriye Akay, Gamze Şıracı","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Foreign bodies in the soft tissue are a critical clinical condition after traumatic injuries. Physical examination is unreliable, and plain radiographs cannot detect radiolucent foreign bodies. In our study, we investigated emergency nurses' foreign body detecting skills on soft tissue with focused ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was planned prospectively with 8 emergency nurses. Emergency nurses underwent 3 hours of theoretical and practical training in imaging foreign bodies with ultrasonography. Chicken thighs were used as foreign body manikins. Metal, wood, and glass materials were used as foreign bodies. After the investigations of manikins, emergency nurses stated whether or not foreign bodies were detected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight emergency nurses performed 384 sonographic examinations. Median postgraduate years of emergency nurses were 6.5 years (interquartile range, 4.5; minimum, 3; maximum, 11). This study showed that foreign body detection with ultrasonography had 87.5% (95% CI, 81.5-92.1) sensitivity, 77.4% (95% CI, 70.3-83.5) specificity, 79.5% (95% CI, 74.1-83.7) positive predictive value, 86.1% (95% CI, 80.5-90.3) negative predictive value, and 82.4% (95% CI, 78-86.4) accuracy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Ultrasonography has good sensitivity and moderate specificity for detecting foreign bodies in the soft tissue by emergency nurses.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.04.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Foreign bodies in the soft tissue are a critical clinical condition after traumatic injuries. Physical examination is unreliable, and plain radiographs cannot detect radiolucent foreign bodies. In our study, we investigated emergency nurses' foreign body detecting skills on soft tissue with focused ultrasonography.

Methods: This study was planned prospectively with 8 emergency nurses. Emergency nurses underwent 3 hours of theoretical and practical training in imaging foreign bodies with ultrasonography. Chicken thighs were used as foreign body manikins. Metal, wood, and glass materials were used as foreign bodies. After the investigations of manikins, emergency nurses stated whether or not foreign bodies were detected.

Results: Eight emergency nurses performed 384 sonographic examinations. Median postgraduate years of emergency nurses were 6.5 years (interquartile range, 4.5; minimum, 3; maximum, 11). This study showed that foreign body detection with ultrasonography had 87.5% (95% CI, 81.5-92.1) sensitivity, 77.4% (95% CI, 70.3-83.5) specificity, 79.5% (95% CI, 74.1-83.7) positive predictive value, 86.1% (95% CI, 80.5-90.3) negative predictive value, and 82.4% (95% CI, 78-86.4) accuracy.

Discussion: Ultrasonography has good sensitivity and moderate specificity for detecting foreign bodies in the soft tissue by emergency nurses.

急诊护士超声检查软组织异物的临床研究。
软组织异物是外伤性损伤后的重要临床症状。体格检查是不可靠的,x线平片不能检测到透光的异物。在本研究中,我们调查了急诊护士用聚焦超声检查软组织异物的技巧。方法:对8名急诊护士进行前瞻性研究。急诊护士在超声成像异物方面接受了3小时的理论和实践培训。鸡腿被用作异物模型。金属、木材和玻璃材料被用作异物。在对人体模型进行调查后,急诊护士说明是否检测到异物。结果:8名急诊护士进行了384次超声检查。急诊护士研究生学龄中位数为6.5年(四分位数差为4.5;至少,3;最大,11)。本研究显示,超声检查异物的敏感性为87.5% (95% CI, 81.5 ~ 92.1),特异性为77.4% (95% CI, 70.3 ~ 83.5),阳性预测值为79.5% (95% CI, 74.1 ~ 83.7),阴性预测值为86.1% (95% CI, 80.5 ~ 90.3),准确率为82.4% (95% CI, 78 ~ 86.4)。讨论:超声对急诊护士检测软组织异物具有良好的敏感性和中等的特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信