Identification and validation of poly-metabolite scores for diets high in ultra-processed food: An observational study and post-hoc randomized controlled crossover-feeding trial.

IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
PLoS Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-20 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004560
Leila Abar, Eurídice Martínez Steele, Sang Kyu Lee, Lisa Kahle, Steven C Moore, Eleanor Watts, Caitlin P O'Connell, Charles E Matthews, Kirsten A Herrick, Kevin D Hall, Lauren E O'Connor, Neal D Freedman, Rashmi Sinha, Hyokyoung G Hong, Erikka Loftfield
{"title":"Identification and validation of poly-metabolite scores for diets high in ultra-processed food: An observational study and post-hoc randomized controlled crossover-feeding trial.","authors":"Leila Abar, Eurídice Martínez Steele, Sang Kyu Lee, Lisa Kahle, Steven C Moore, Eleanor Watts, Caitlin P O'Connell, Charles E Matthews, Kirsten A Herrick, Kevin D Hall, Lauren E O'Connor, Neal D Freedman, Rashmi Sinha, Hyokyoung G Hong, Erikka Loftfield","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultra-processed food (UPF) accounts for a majority of calories consumed in the United States, but the impact on human health remains unclear. We aimed to identify poly-metabolite scores in blood and urine that are predictive of UPF intake.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>Of the 1,082 Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP (IDATA) Study (clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT03268577) participants, aged 50-74 years, who provided biospecimen consent, n = 718 with serially collected blood and urine and one to six 24-h dietary recalls (ASA-24s), collected over 12-months, met eligibility criteria and were included in the metabolomics analysis. Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure >1,000 serum and urine metabolites. Average daily UPF intake was estimated as percentage energy according to the Nova system. Partial Spearman correlations and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression were used to estimate UPF-metabolite correlations and build poly-metabolite scores of UPF intake, respectively. Scores were tested in a post-hoc analysis of a previously conducted randomized, controlled, crossover-feeding trial (clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT03407053) of 20 subjects who were admitted to the NIH Clinical Center and randomized to consume ad libitum diets that were 80% or 0% energy from UPF for 2 weeks immediately followed by the alternate diet for 2 weeks; eligible subjects were between 18-50 years old with a body mass index of >18.5 kg/m2 and weight-stable. IDATA participants were 51% female, and 97% completed ≥4 ASA-24s. Mean intake was 50% energy from UPF. UPF intake was correlated with 191 (of 952) serum and 293 (of 1,044) 24-h urine metabolites (FDR-corrected P-value < 0.01), including lipid (n = 56 serum, n = 22 24-h urine), amino acid (n = 33, 61), carbohydrate (n = 4, 8), xenobiotic (n = 33, 70), cofactor and vitamin (n = 9, 12), peptide (n = 7, 6), and nucleotide (n = 7, 10) metabolites. Using LASSO regression, 28 serum and 33 24-h urine metabolites were selected as predictors of UPF intake; biospecimen-specific scores were calculated as a linear combination of selected metabolites. Overlapping metabolites included (S)C(S)S-S-Methylcysteine sulfoxide (rs = -0.23, -0.19), N2,N5-diacetylornithine (rs = -0.27 for serum, -0.26 for 24-h urine), pentoic acid (rs = -0.30, -0.32), and N6-carboxymethyllysine (rs = 0.15, 0.20). Within the cross-over feeding trial, the poly-metabolite scores differed, within individual, between UPF diet phases (P-value for paired t test < 0.001). IDATA Study participants were older US adults whose diets may not be reflective of other populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Poly-metabolite scores, developed in IDATA participants with varying diets, are predictive of UPF intake and could advance epidemiological research on UPF and health. Poly-metabolite scores should be evaluated and iteratively improved in populations with a wide range of UPF intake.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"22 5","pages":"e1004560"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12091781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004560","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ultra-processed food (UPF) accounts for a majority of calories consumed in the United States, but the impact on human health remains unclear. We aimed to identify poly-metabolite scores in blood and urine that are predictive of UPF intake.

Methods and findings: Of the 1,082 Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP (IDATA) Study (clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT03268577) participants, aged 50-74 years, who provided biospecimen consent, n = 718 with serially collected blood and urine and one to six 24-h dietary recalls (ASA-24s), collected over 12-months, met eligibility criteria and were included in the metabolomics analysis. Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure >1,000 serum and urine metabolites. Average daily UPF intake was estimated as percentage energy according to the Nova system. Partial Spearman correlations and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression were used to estimate UPF-metabolite correlations and build poly-metabolite scores of UPF intake, respectively. Scores were tested in a post-hoc analysis of a previously conducted randomized, controlled, crossover-feeding trial (clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT03407053) of 20 subjects who were admitted to the NIH Clinical Center and randomized to consume ad libitum diets that were 80% or 0% energy from UPF for 2 weeks immediately followed by the alternate diet for 2 weeks; eligible subjects were between 18-50 years old with a body mass index of >18.5 kg/m2 and weight-stable. IDATA participants were 51% female, and 97% completed ≥4 ASA-24s. Mean intake was 50% energy from UPF. UPF intake was correlated with 191 (of 952) serum and 293 (of 1,044) 24-h urine metabolites (FDR-corrected P-value < 0.01), including lipid (n = 56 serum, n = 22 24-h urine), amino acid (n = 33, 61), carbohydrate (n = 4, 8), xenobiotic (n = 33, 70), cofactor and vitamin (n = 9, 12), peptide (n = 7, 6), and nucleotide (n = 7, 10) metabolites. Using LASSO regression, 28 serum and 33 24-h urine metabolites were selected as predictors of UPF intake; biospecimen-specific scores were calculated as a linear combination of selected metabolites. Overlapping metabolites included (S)C(S)S-S-Methylcysteine sulfoxide (rs = -0.23, -0.19), N2,N5-diacetylornithine (rs = -0.27 for serum, -0.26 for 24-h urine), pentoic acid (rs = -0.30, -0.32), and N6-carboxymethyllysine (rs = 0.15, 0.20). Within the cross-over feeding trial, the poly-metabolite scores differed, within individual, between UPF diet phases (P-value for paired t test < 0.001). IDATA Study participants were older US adults whose diets may not be reflective of other populations.

Conclusions: Poly-metabolite scores, developed in IDATA participants with varying diets, are predictive of UPF intake and could advance epidemiological research on UPF and health. Poly-metabolite scores should be evaluated and iteratively improved in populations with a wide range of UPF intake.

超加工食品高含量饮食中多代谢物评分的鉴定和验证:一项观察性研究和事后随机对照交叉饲养试验
背景:超加工食品(UPF)占美国消耗的大部分卡路里,但对人类健康的影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是确定血液和尿液中的多代谢物评分,以预测UPF的摄入量。方法和发现:在AARP (IDATA)研究(clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT03268577)中,1082名年龄在50-74岁、提供生物标本同意的参与者中,n = 718人连续收集了12个月的血液和尿液,并进行了1至6次24小时饮食回忆(ASA-24s),符合资格标准,并被纳入代谢组学分析。采用超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定血清和尿液代谢物。根据Nova系统,平均每日UPF摄入量以能量百分比估算。部分Spearman相关性和最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归分别用于估计UPF代谢物相关性和建立UPF摄入的多代谢物评分。在之前进行的一项随机、对照、交叉喂养试验(clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT03407053)的事后分析中,对得分进行了测试。20名受试者被送入NIH临床中心,并随机分配在2周内食用含有80%或0% UPF能量的随意饮食,紧接着是2周的替代饮食;符合条件的受试者年龄在18-50岁之间,体重指数为>18.5 kg/m2,体重稳定。IDATA参与者中51%为女性,97%完成≥4次asa -24。平均摄入50%的能量来自UPF。UPF摄入量与191(952)个血清代谢物和293(1044)个24小时尿液代谢物(fdr校正的p值)相关。结论:在不同饮食的IDATA参与者中开发的多代谢物评分可预测UPF摄入量,并可推进UPF与健康的流行病学研究。多代谢物评分应在UPF摄入范围广泛的人群中进行评估和迭代改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Medicine
PLoS Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
0.60%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings. The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination. PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信