Comparing virtual and in-person training for intracavernosal injection therapy in a multidisciplinary sexual health clinic within a prostate cancer survivorship program.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Anna-Lisa V Nguyen, Sania Julian, Rosalie Ho, Christine Zarowski, Meghan Lui, Irene Yu, Daniella Sare, Monita Sundar, Celestia S Higano, Ryan Flannigan
{"title":"Comparing virtual and in-person training for intracavernosal injection therapy in a multidisciplinary sexual health clinic within a prostate cancer survivorship program.","authors":"Anna-Lisa V Nguyen, Sania Julian, Rosalie Ho, Christine Zarowski, Meghan Lui, Irene Yu, Daniella Sare, Monita Sundar, Celestia S Higano, Ryan Flannigan","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Sexual Health Clinic (SHC) offered by the Prostate Cancer Supportive Care (PCSC) Program delivers sexual health therapies for prostate cancer (PCa) patients and their partners. Since April 2020, training for using intracavernosal injections (ICI) to treat erectile dysfunction has been offered in either in-person or virtual appointments. This study's primary objective was to assess the effectiveness of virtual compared to in-person ICI training by analyzing clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) within each group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective, ethics-approved chart review of all patients who received ICI training between January 2019 and April 2023. PROs collected were obtained prospectively during routine clinical care. Outcomes, including PROs, satisfaction, and adverse events, were measured using surveys and validated questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over four years, 74 patients received ICI training, 54 virtually and 24 in-person. Each group's demographics are similar with respect to age, education level, ethnicity, and partner information. Most patients had not attempted ICI before enrolling in the SHC and were not satisfied with other therapeutic options to treat their ED. Adherence was high in both groups. Virtual and in-person ICI teaching was similar with respect to clinical outcomes and satisfaction. Overall satisfaction was low in both groups. The frequency of adverse events was comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, clinical outcomes with ICI training in the virtual format do not appear to differ from those completed in person. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Sexual Health Clinic (SHC) offered by the Prostate Cancer Supportive Care (PCSC) Program delivers sexual health therapies for prostate cancer (PCa) patients and their partners. Since April 2020, training for using intracavernosal injections (ICI) to treat erectile dysfunction has been offered in either in-person or virtual appointments. This study's primary objective was to assess the effectiveness of virtual compared to in-person ICI training by analyzing clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) within each group.

Methods: This is a retrospective, ethics-approved chart review of all patients who received ICI training between January 2019 and April 2023. PROs collected were obtained prospectively during routine clinical care. Outcomes, including PROs, satisfaction, and adverse events, were measured using surveys and validated questionnaires.

Results: Over four years, 74 patients received ICI training, 54 virtually and 24 in-person. Each group's demographics are similar with respect to age, education level, ethnicity, and partner information. Most patients had not attempted ICI before enrolling in the SHC and were not satisfied with other therapeutic options to treat their ED. Adherence was high in both groups. Virtual and in-person ICI teaching was similar with respect to clinical outcomes and satisfaction. Overall satisfaction was low in both groups. The frequency of adverse events was comparable.

Conclusions: Overall, clinical outcomes with ICI training in the virtual format do not appear to differ from those completed in person. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

前列腺癌幸存者项目中多学科性健康诊所海绵体内注射治疗的虚拟和现场培训的比较
简介:由前列腺癌支持性护理(PCSC)项目提供的性健康诊所(SHC)为前列腺癌(PCa)患者及其伴侣提供性健康治疗。自2020年4月以来,已经通过面对面或虚拟预约提供了使用海绵体内注射(ICI)治疗勃起功能障碍的培训。本研究的主要目的是通过分析每组的临床和患者报告的结果(PROs)来评估虚拟ICI培训与面对面ICI培训的有效性。方法:这是一项回顾性的、经伦理批准的图表综述,纳入了2019年1月至2023年4月期间接受ICI培训的所有患者。在常规临床护理中前瞻性地收集PROs。结果,包括赞成、满意度和不良事件,通过调查和有效的问卷来测量。结果:在4年多的时间里,74例患者接受了ICI培训,54例虚拟培训,24例面对面培训。每个群体的人口统计数据在年龄、教育水平、种族和伴侣信息方面都是相似的。大多数患者在参加SHC之前没有尝试过ICI,并且对治疗ED的其他治疗方案不满意。两组患者的依从性都很高。虚拟和面对面的ICI教学在临床结果和满意度方面是相似的。两组的总体满意度都很低。不良事件发生的频率具有可比性。结论:总体而言,虚拟形式的ICI培训的临床结果似乎与亲自完成的培训没有差异。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信