Prevalence of Axillary Arch Variant Anatomy on Breast MRI and Impact on Axillary Lymph Node Assessment.

IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Anne Elizabeth Kendell, Samantha Yost, Kristie Yang, Megan Mills, Nicole Winkler
{"title":"Prevalence of Axillary Arch Variant Anatomy on Breast MRI and Impact on Axillary Lymph Node Assessment.","authors":"Anne Elizabeth Kendell, Samantha Yost, Kristie Yang, Megan Mills, Nicole Winkler","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the prevalence of the axillary arch (AA) variant and its impact on the sensitivity of US vs MRI for detecting axillary nodal metastases in patients with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IRB waved informed consent for this retrospective study. Three hundred, eighty-two breast MRIs performed for the extent of disease of breast cancer between 2012 and 2023 were reviewed for the presence of AA. Pre-MRI axillary US was available in 322 of these cases. The presence of axillary adenopathy was documented and correlated with pathology. A paired sample comparison was used to calculate sensitivities of US and MRI for detection of the AA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AA was detected on breast MRI in 6.8% (26/382) of patients. Of these, 30.8% (8/26) were bilateral, 50% (13/26) were unilateral left, and 19.2% (5/26) were unilateral right. All had lymph nodes both superficial and deep to the AA. Of the 26 patients with AA, 19 patients underwent pre-MRI axillary US. Biopsy-proven malignant adenopathy was detected on MRI but missed on US in 10.5% (2/19) of patients with AA but only 2.5% (7/279) of patients without AA. Sensitivity for detection of lymphadenopathy on MRI and US was 69.7% (82/122)% and 67.5% (77/114) for all patients (P = .17), 72.2% (78/108) and 68.5% (74/108) for patients without AA (P = .21), and 66.2% (4/6) and 50.0% (3/6) for patients with AA. The small sample size of patients with AA precluded statistical comparison.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AA is a common variant detectable on breast MRI. Axillary nodal metastases may reduce US sensitivity for identifying nodal metastases. Further investigation is required to establish statistical significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the prevalence of the axillary arch (AA) variant and its impact on the sensitivity of US vs MRI for detecting axillary nodal metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Methods: The IRB waved informed consent for this retrospective study. Three hundred, eighty-two breast MRIs performed for the extent of disease of breast cancer between 2012 and 2023 were reviewed for the presence of AA. Pre-MRI axillary US was available in 322 of these cases. The presence of axillary adenopathy was documented and correlated with pathology. A paired sample comparison was used to calculate sensitivities of US and MRI for detection of the AA.

Results: The AA was detected on breast MRI in 6.8% (26/382) of patients. Of these, 30.8% (8/26) were bilateral, 50% (13/26) were unilateral left, and 19.2% (5/26) were unilateral right. All had lymph nodes both superficial and deep to the AA. Of the 26 patients with AA, 19 patients underwent pre-MRI axillary US. Biopsy-proven malignant adenopathy was detected on MRI but missed on US in 10.5% (2/19) of patients with AA but only 2.5% (7/279) of patients without AA. Sensitivity for detection of lymphadenopathy on MRI and US was 69.7% (82/122)% and 67.5% (77/114) for all patients (P = .17), 72.2% (78/108) and 68.5% (74/108) for patients without AA (P = .21), and 66.2% (4/6) and 50.0% (3/6) for patients with AA. The small sample size of patients with AA precluded statistical comparison.

Conclusion: The AA is a common variant detectable on breast MRI. Axillary nodal metastases may reduce US sensitivity for identifying nodal metastases. Further investigation is required to establish statistical significance.

腋窝弓变异解剖在乳腺MRI上的流行及对腋窝淋巴结评估的影响。
目的:探讨腋窝弓(axillary arch, AA)变异的患病率及其对乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结转移的US和MRI检测敏感性的影响。方法:IRB对这项回顾性研究表示知情同意。回顾了2012年至2023年期间进行的382例乳腺癌疾病程度的乳房mri,以确定AA的存在。其中322例进行了mri前腋窝超声检查。腋窝腺病的存在被记录并与病理相关。采用配对样本比较计算US和MRI检测AA的灵敏度。结果:乳腺MRI检出AA的比例为6.8%(26/382)。其中,30.8%(8/26)为双侧,50%(13/26)为单侧左侧,19.2%(5/26)为单侧右侧。所有人都有淋巴结,有浅表淋巴结,也有深淋巴结。在26例AA患者中,19例患者行mri前腋窝超声检查。10.5%的AA患者(2/19)在MRI上发现活检证实的恶性腺病,但在US上未发现,而在非AA患者中,这一比例仅为2.5%(7/279)。MRI和US对所有患者淋巴结病变的敏感度分别为69.7%(82/122)%和67.5% (77/114)(P = 0.17),对无AA患者的敏感度分别为72.2%(78/108)和68.5% (74/108)(P = 0.21),对AA患者的敏感度分别为66.2%(4/6)和50.0%(3/6)。AA患者的小样本量妨碍了统计比较。结论:AA是乳腺MRI可检出的常见变异。腋窝淋巴结转移可能会降低美国鉴别淋巴结转移的敏感性。需要进一步调查以确定统计显著性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
81
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信