Sex differences in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

European heart journal open Pub Date : 2025-04-28 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf047
Nertila Zylyftari, Mads Wissenberg, Filip Gnesin, Amalie Lykkemark Møller, Elisabeth Helen Anna Mills, Sidsel G Møller, Britta Jensen, Kristian Bundgaard Ringgren, Hanno L Tan, Fredrik Folke, Gunnar Gislason, Christian Torp- Pedersen, Christina Ji-Young Lee
{"title":"Sex differences in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.","authors":"Nertila Zylyftari, Mads Wissenberg, Filip Gnesin, Amalie Lykkemark Møller, Elisabeth Helen Anna Mills, Sidsel G Møller, Britta Jensen, Kristian Bundgaard Ringgren, Hanno L Tan, Fredrik Folke, Gunnar Gislason, Christian Torp- Pedersen, Christina Ji-Young Lee","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The impact of resuscitation care initiatives on sex-differences in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival remains unclear. We aim to examine sex-differences in characteristics and survival.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This Danish register-based study (2001-2020) included adult patients with a presumed cardiac cause of arrest. Temporal trends in survival were stratified by sex and subgroups: (i) bystander-witnessed status; (ii) bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); (iii) initial shockable heart rhythm; and age groups of <50, 50-75, and >75 years. To examine the association between sex and survival, we conducted adjusted logistic regression analyses. Among 50 066 OHCAs, women represented 34%. Women were older, had more chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lower prevalence of cardiovascular and cardiometabolic conditions than men. Women also had more OHCA at home (83.4 vs. 74.1%), fewer witnessed arrests (48.1 vs. 52.9%), half the probability of initial shockable heart rhythm (13.6 vs. 27.6%), and similar rates of receiving bystander-CPR. Survival rates improved over time for both sexes, but men had higher 30-day survival than women, even in subgroup and adjusted analyses [odds ratios (OR): 1.29; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.15-1.45, <i>P</i> < 0.001]. Sex-differences in survival were larger among those aged 50-75 years (in absolute and relative rates) and bystander witnessed arrests, while differences were smaller in those with initial shockable heart rhythms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite increases in 30-day survival for both sexes, women consistently had lower survival rates than men. Sex-differences were larger among those aged 50-75 years or with bystander witnessed arrests, but smaller in the subset of patients with an initial shockable heart rhythm.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 3","pages":"oeaf047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The impact of resuscitation care initiatives on sex-differences in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival remains unclear. We aim to examine sex-differences in characteristics and survival.

Methods and results: This Danish register-based study (2001-2020) included adult patients with a presumed cardiac cause of arrest. Temporal trends in survival were stratified by sex and subgroups: (i) bystander-witnessed status; (ii) bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); (iii) initial shockable heart rhythm; and age groups of <50, 50-75, and >75 years. To examine the association between sex and survival, we conducted adjusted logistic regression analyses. Among 50 066 OHCAs, women represented 34%. Women were older, had more chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lower prevalence of cardiovascular and cardiometabolic conditions than men. Women also had more OHCA at home (83.4 vs. 74.1%), fewer witnessed arrests (48.1 vs. 52.9%), half the probability of initial shockable heart rhythm (13.6 vs. 27.6%), and similar rates of receiving bystander-CPR. Survival rates improved over time for both sexes, but men had higher 30-day survival than women, even in subgroup and adjusted analyses [odds ratios (OR): 1.29; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.15-1.45, P < 0.001]. Sex-differences in survival were larger among those aged 50-75 years (in absolute and relative rates) and bystander witnessed arrests, while differences were smaller in those with initial shockable heart rhythms.

Conclusion: Despite increases in 30-day survival for both sexes, women consistently had lower survival rates than men. Sex-differences were larger among those aged 50-75 years or with bystander witnessed arrests, but smaller in the subset of patients with an initial shockable heart rhythm.

院外心脏骤停的性别差异
目的:复苏护理措施对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)生存率性别差异的影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是研究性别在特征和生存方面的差异。方法和结果:这项基于丹麦登记的研究(2001-2020)纳入了假定心脏骤停的成年患者。生存率的时间趋势按性别和亚组分层:(i)旁观者目击状态;(ii)旁观者心肺复苏术;(iii)初始震荡性心律;以及75岁的年龄组。为了检验性别与生存率之间的关系,我们进行了调整后的逻辑回归分析。在50066个ohca中,妇女占34%。与男性相比,女性年龄更大,有更多的慢性阻塞性肺病,心血管和心脏代谢疾病的患病率更低。女性在家中也有更多的OHCA (83.4 vs. 74.1%),更少的逮捕(48.1 vs. 52.9%),一半的初始休克性心律(13.6 vs. 27.6%),接受旁观者心肺复苏术的比率相似。随着时间的推移,两性的生存率都有所提高,但即使在亚组和调整分析中,男性的30天生存率也高于女性[优势比(OR): 1.29;95%置信区间(CI): 1.15-1.45, P < 0.001]。在50-75岁之间(绝对比率和相对比率)和旁观者目睹逮捕的患者中,存活率的性别差异更大,而在最初心率不稳的患者中,差异较小。结论:尽管男女患者的30天生存率均有所增加,但女性患者的生存率始终低于男性。性别差异在年龄在50-75岁之间或有旁观者目睹逮捕的患者中较大,但在最初心律不稳的患者中较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信