Association of Respiratory Pathogen Panel Testing on the Proportion of Emergency Department Revisits in Children With Symptoms of Upper Respiratory Illness.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Matthew Carman, Jesse Glueck, A Brad Hall, Kayla Wilson
{"title":"Association of Respiratory Pathogen Panel Testing on the Proportion of Emergency Department Revisits in Children With Symptoms of Upper Respiratory Illness.","authors":"Matthew Carman, Jesse Glueck, A Brad Hall, Kayla Wilson","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Acute respiratory tract infections are the main cause of morbidity and emergency department visits for children. Recent advances in testing have brought about the ability to quickly diagnose many of the pathogens contributing to viral respiratory illness. The purpose of the study is to evaluate respiratory pathogen panel testing versus clinical diagnosis on the proportion of emergency department (ED) same-site revisits in an uncomplicated, healthy pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an IRB-approved, retrospective cohort study. Patients discharged from the ED between the ages of 6 months to 3 years with a discharge diagnosis of acute upper respiratory infection from January 1, 2015, to May 31, 2023, were screened for inclusion. The primary outcome was the proportion of ED revisits within 3 days for upper respiratory illness-related complaints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference in ED revisits with 6% of patients in the RPP group versus 5% of patients in the No-RPP group returning in 3 days for upper respiratory complaints (P=0.57). Of the 16 patients with RPP returning to the ED, the most common organism identified was rhinovirus/enterovirus. There was no difference in ED disposition after revisit, with the majority of patients discharging to home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study demonstrated no difference in the proportion of return visits to the ED in overall healthy children presenting with uncomplicated acute respiratory illness. These results support the consensus that viral respiratory panel testing may be performed on a selective basis to drive care in the emergency department.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Acute respiratory tract infections are the main cause of morbidity and emergency department visits for children. Recent advances in testing have brought about the ability to quickly diagnose many of the pathogens contributing to viral respiratory illness. The purpose of the study is to evaluate respiratory pathogen panel testing versus clinical diagnosis on the proportion of emergency department (ED) same-site revisits in an uncomplicated, healthy pediatric population.

Methods: This was an IRB-approved, retrospective cohort study. Patients discharged from the ED between the ages of 6 months to 3 years with a discharge diagnosis of acute upper respiratory infection from January 1, 2015, to May 31, 2023, were screened for inclusion. The primary outcome was the proportion of ED revisits within 3 days for upper respiratory illness-related complaints.

Results: There was no difference in ED revisits with 6% of patients in the RPP group versus 5% of patients in the No-RPP group returning in 3 days for upper respiratory complaints (P=0.57). Of the 16 patients with RPP returning to the ED, the most common organism identified was rhinovirus/enterovirus. There was no difference in ED disposition after revisit, with the majority of patients discharging to home.

Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrated no difference in the proportion of return visits to the ED in overall healthy children presenting with uncomplicated acute respiratory illness. These results support the consensus that viral respiratory panel testing may be performed on a selective basis to drive care in the emergency department.

呼吸道病原体面板检测与上呼吸道疾病患儿急诊科就诊比例的关系
目的:急性呼吸道感染是儿童发病和急诊科就诊的主要原因。最近在检测方面取得的进展使我们能够快速诊断许多导致病毒性呼吸道疾病的病原体。本研究的目的是评估呼吸道病原体面板检测与临床诊断在急诊室(ED)同一地点复诊的比例在一个简单的,健康的儿科人群。方法:这是一项经irb批准的回顾性队列研究。筛选2015年1月1日至2023年5月31日期间,年龄在6个月至3岁之间,出院诊断为急性上呼吸道感染的急诊科出院患者。主要终点是3天内因上呼吸道疾病相关的主诉而去急诊室就诊的比例。结果:RPP组有6%的患者因上呼吸道疾病在3天内复诊,而无RPP组有5%的患者因上呼吸道疾病在3天内复诊,两者无差异(P=0.57)。在返回急诊室的16例RPP患者中,最常见的微生物是鼻病毒/肠道病毒。重访后ED的处置没有差异,大多数患者出院回家。结论:本研究的结果表明,在总体健康的无并发症急性呼吸系统疾病的儿童中,回访急诊科的比例没有差异。这些结果支持了一种共识,即病毒性呼吸面板测试可以在选择性的基础上进行,以推动急诊科的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信