Assessing Commercial Tissue-Based Assays for Autoimmune Neurologic Disorders (II): Antibodies to Surface Antigens.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Claudia Papi, Chiara Milano, Lionel Arlettaz, Pietro Businaro, Laura Marmolejo, Laura Naranjo, Jesús Planagumà, Eugenia Martinez-Hernandez, Thaís Armangué, Mar Guasp, Raquel Ruiz-García, Esther Aguilar, Matteo Gastaldi, Raffaele Iorio, Carles Gaig, Albert Saiz, Lidia Sabater, Francesc Graus, Josep O Dalmau, Marianna Spatola
{"title":"Assessing Commercial Tissue-Based Assays for Autoimmune Neurologic Disorders (II): Antibodies to Surface Antigens.","authors":"Claudia Papi, Chiara Milano, Lionel Arlettaz, Pietro Businaro, Laura Marmolejo, Laura Naranjo, Jesús Planagumà, Eugenia Martinez-Hernandez, Thaís Armangué, Mar Guasp, Raquel Ruiz-García, Esther Aguilar, Matteo Gastaldi, Raffaele Iorio, Carles Gaig, Albert Saiz, Lidia Sabater, Francesc Graus, Josep O Dalmau, Marianna Spatola","doi":"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Detecting neural surface antibodies (NSAbs) is essential for diagnosing autoimmune encephalitis. The recommended diagnostic strategy involves initial screening with tissue-based assays (TBAs), followed by confirmation with cell-based assays (CBAs). While specialized centers use in-house TBAs, many clinical laboratories depend on commercial TBAs, whose accuracy is yet to be fully assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected 92 CSF and 99 serum samples from patients with autoimmune encephalitis and NSAbs confirmed by in-house TBAs and CBAs (20 samples each for AMPAR, GABA<sub>A</sub>R, GABA<sub>B</sub>R, IgLON5, LGI1, NMDAR, and CASPR2; 19 for mGluR5; 17 for DPPX; and 15 for mGluR1 antibodies), along with 50 CSF and 50 serum samples from negative controls. We assessed the performance of a commercial indirect immunofluorescence (IIF)-TBA (EUROIMMUN). Slides were evaluated as \"positive\" or \"negative\" by 2 experienced investigators and 2 less experienced raters. Discordant results were re-evaluated through interrater discussion and assessed using Cohen's kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experienced raters agreed on 94% (133/142) of CSF and 88% (131/149) of serum classifications (Cohen's kappa = 0.87 and 0.75, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among CSF samples, 75% (106/142) were correctly identified while 19% (27/142) were misclassified (13 false positives, 14 false negatives). Among serum samples, 66% (98/149) were correctly identified while 22% (33/149) were misclassified (11 false positives, 22 false negatives). The poorest performance was seen in detecting NMDAR, GABA<sub>A</sub>R, and mGluR5 Abs, which were not identified in 5 of 10, 6 of 10, and 5 of 9 serum samples and in 4 of 10, 5 of 10, and 5 of 10 CSF samples, respectively. The overall sensitivity of the commercial IIF-TBA was 84% for CSF and 76% for serum while the specificity was 72% for CSF and 73% for serum. Less experienced raters correctly identified 69% (98/142) of CSF samples and 73% (109/149) of serum samples and misclassified 13% (18/142) of CSF samples and 11% (16/149) of serum samples, and 18% (26/142) of CSF samples and 16% (24/149) of serum samples remained discordant.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The diagnostic performance of EUROIMMUN IIF-TBA in detecting NSAbs in autoimmune encephalitis is suboptimal. NMDAR antibodies, among the most common NSAbs, can be missed in 50% of cases. This commercial TBA should not be used alone as a screening method nor as a confirmatory technique for NSAbs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19472,"journal":{"name":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","volume":"12 4","pages":"e200406"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153941/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200406","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Detecting neural surface antibodies (NSAbs) is essential for diagnosing autoimmune encephalitis. The recommended diagnostic strategy involves initial screening with tissue-based assays (TBAs), followed by confirmation with cell-based assays (CBAs). While specialized centers use in-house TBAs, many clinical laboratories depend on commercial TBAs, whose accuracy is yet to be fully assessed.

Methods: We selected 92 CSF and 99 serum samples from patients with autoimmune encephalitis and NSAbs confirmed by in-house TBAs and CBAs (20 samples each for AMPAR, GABAAR, GABABR, IgLON5, LGI1, NMDAR, and CASPR2; 19 for mGluR5; 17 for DPPX; and 15 for mGluR1 antibodies), along with 50 CSF and 50 serum samples from negative controls. We assessed the performance of a commercial indirect immunofluorescence (IIF)-TBA (EUROIMMUN). Slides were evaluated as "positive" or "negative" by 2 experienced investigators and 2 less experienced raters. Discordant results were re-evaluated through interrater discussion and assessed using Cohen's kappa.

Results: The experienced raters agreed on 94% (133/142) of CSF and 88% (131/149) of serum classifications (Cohen's kappa = 0.87 and 0.75, respectively, p < 0.001). Among CSF samples, 75% (106/142) were correctly identified while 19% (27/142) were misclassified (13 false positives, 14 false negatives). Among serum samples, 66% (98/149) were correctly identified while 22% (33/149) were misclassified (11 false positives, 22 false negatives). The poorest performance was seen in detecting NMDAR, GABAAR, and mGluR5 Abs, which were not identified in 5 of 10, 6 of 10, and 5 of 9 serum samples and in 4 of 10, 5 of 10, and 5 of 10 CSF samples, respectively. The overall sensitivity of the commercial IIF-TBA was 84% for CSF and 76% for serum while the specificity was 72% for CSF and 73% for serum. Less experienced raters correctly identified 69% (98/142) of CSF samples and 73% (109/149) of serum samples and misclassified 13% (18/142) of CSF samples and 11% (16/149) of serum samples, and 18% (26/142) of CSF samples and 16% (24/149) of serum samples remained discordant.

Discussion: The diagnostic performance of EUROIMMUN IIF-TBA in detecting NSAbs in autoimmune encephalitis is suboptimal. NMDAR antibodies, among the most common NSAbs, can be missed in 50% of cases. This commercial TBA should not be used alone as a screening method nor as a confirmatory technique for NSAbs.

评估自身免疫性神经系统疾病的商业组织检测(II):表面抗原抗体
背景与目的:检测神经表面抗体(nabs)是诊断自身免疫性脑炎的必要条件。推荐的诊断策略包括用基于组织的测定法(TBAs)进行初步筛查,然后用基于细胞的测定法(cba)进行确认。虽然专业中心使用内部tba,但许多临床实验室依赖于商业tba,其准确性尚未得到充分评估。方法:我们从内部TBAs和CBAs确认的自身免疫性脑炎和nabs患者中选择92份脑脊液和99份血清样本(AMPAR、GABAAR、GABABR、IgLON5、LGI1、NMDAR和CASPR2各20份样本);mGluR5为19;DPPX为17;mGluR1抗体15份),以及来自阴性对照的50份CSF和50份血清样本。我们评估了商业间接免疫荧光(IIF)-TBA (EUROIMMUN)的性能。2名经验丰富的调查人员和2名经验不足的评判员对载玻片进行“积极”或“消极”的评估。不一致的结果通过译员讨论重新评估,并使用Cohen’s kappa进行评估。结果:有经验的评分者对脑脊液分类的满意率为94%(133/142),对血清分类的满意率为88% (131/149)(Cohen’s kappa分别为0.87和0.75,p < 0.001)。在脑脊液样本中,75%(106/142)被正确识别,19%(27/142)被错误分类(假阳性13例,假阴性14例)。在血清样本中,正确率为66%(98/149),误分率为22%(33/149)(假阳性11例,假阴性22例)。NMDAR、GABAAR和mGluR5抗体的检测效果最差,在10份血清样本中有5份、10份中有6份和9份血清样本中有5份未被检测到,在10份CSF样本中有4份、10份中有5份和10份中有5份未被检测到。商用IIF-TBA对脑脊液的总体敏感性为84%,对血清的敏感性为76%,而对脑脊液的特异性为72%,对血清的特异性为73%。经验不足的评分者正确识别了69%(98/142)的脑脊液样本和73%(109/149)的血清样本,错误分类了13%(18/142)的脑脊液样本和11%(16/149)的血清样本,18%(26/142)的脑脊液样本和16%(24/149)的血清样本仍然不一致。讨论:EUROIMMUN IIF-TBA检测自身免疫性脑炎nabs的诊断性能不理想。NMDAR抗体是最常见的nsab之一,在50%的病例中可能会遗漏。这种商业化TBA不应单独用作nabs的筛选方法或确认技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
219
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation is an official journal of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation will be the premier peer-reviewed journal in neuroimmunology and neuroinflammation. This journal publishes rigorously peer-reviewed open-access reports of original research and in-depth reviews of topics in neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, affecting the full range of neurologic diseases including (but not limited to) Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, ALS, tauopathy, and stroke; multiple sclerosis and NMO; inflammatory peripheral nerve and muscle disease, Guillain-Barré and myasthenia gravis; nervous system infection; paraneoplastic syndromes, noninfectious encephalitides and other antibody-mediated disorders; and psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. Clinical trials, instructive case reports, and small case series will also be featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信