Radiosurgery for central nervous system ependymomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Amirhossein Zare, Amirhessam Zare, Bardia Hajikarimloo, Barbod Mohammadi, Jason P Sheehan, Arad Iranmehr
{"title":"Radiosurgery for central nervous system ependymomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Amirhossein Zare, Amirhessam Zare, Bardia Hajikarimloo, Barbod Mohammadi, Jason P Sheehan, Arad Iranmehr","doi":"10.1007/s11060-025-05076-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ependymomas, rare malignant central nervous system (CNS) lesions (2-6% of primary CNS tumors), are typically treated with maximal safe resection followed by fractionated radiation therapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as an alternative, particularly in recurrent or residual cases. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of SRS for CNS ependymomas, while also identifying key prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search was conducted to identify studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of SRS in WHO Grade 2/3 CNS ependymoma patients. Random-effect meta-analysis was employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies with 298 patients and 496 lesions were included. Our meta-analysis demonstrated an overall local tumor control (LTC) rate of 72% (95% CI: 65-79%). LTC rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 83% (95% CI: 76-88%), 72% (95% CI: 64-78%), and 69% (95% CI: 61-76%), respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were estimated at 67% (95% CI: 50-80%), 56% (95% CI: 48-64%), and 51% (95% CI: 39-63%), respectively. Additionally, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 58% (95% CI: 48-67%). The incidence of adverse radiation events (ARE) was 20% (95% CI: 12-31%). Meta-regression showed older age correlated with improved tumor control (P = 0.02) and lower ARE (P = 0.06) and radionecrosis rates (P < 0.01), while larger tumor volumes (P = 0.03) and anaplastic histology (P = 0.01) were associated with poorer PFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SRS is a reasonably valuable therapeutic option in the multimodal management of WHO Grade 2/3 CNS ependymomas, especially for individuals with inoperable, recurrent, or residual lesions. Key patient and tumor characteristics have been analyzed to determine factors potentially impacting treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-05076-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ependymomas, rare malignant central nervous system (CNS) lesions (2-6% of primary CNS tumors), are typically treated with maximal safe resection followed by fractionated radiation therapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as an alternative, particularly in recurrent or residual cases. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of SRS for CNS ependymomas, while also identifying key prognostic factors.

Method: A systematic search was conducted to identify studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of SRS in WHO Grade 2/3 CNS ependymoma patients. Random-effect meta-analysis was employed.

Results: Fourteen studies with 298 patients and 496 lesions were included. Our meta-analysis demonstrated an overall local tumor control (LTC) rate of 72% (95% CI: 65-79%). LTC rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 83% (95% CI: 76-88%), 72% (95% CI: 64-78%), and 69% (95% CI: 61-76%), respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were estimated at 67% (95% CI: 50-80%), 56% (95% CI: 48-64%), and 51% (95% CI: 39-63%), respectively. Additionally, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 58% (95% CI: 48-67%). The incidence of adverse radiation events (ARE) was 20% (95% CI: 12-31%). Meta-regression showed older age correlated with improved tumor control (P = 0.02) and lower ARE (P = 0.06) and radionecrosis rates (P < 0.01), while larger tumor volumes (P = 0.03) and anaplastic histology (P = 0.01) were associated with poorer PFS.

Conclusions: SRS is a reasonably valuable therapeutic option in the multimodal management of WHO Grade 2/3 CNS ependymomas, especially for individuals with inoperable, recurrent, or residual lesions. Key patient and tumor characteristics have been analyzed to determine factors potentially impacting treatment outcomes.

放射外科治疗中枢神经系统室管膜瘤:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:室管膜瘤是一种罕见的中枢神经系统(CNS)恶性病变(占原发性CNS肿瘤的2-6%),通常采用最大安全切除后分次放射治疗。立体定向放射手术(SRS)已成为一种替代方法,特别是在复发或残留病例中。本研究评估了SRS治疗中枢神经系统室管膜瘤的安全性和有效性,同时也确定了关键的预后因素。方法:系统检索评价SRS治疗WHO 2/3级中枢神经室管膜瘤患者疗效和安全性的研究。采用随机效应荟萃分析。结果:纳入14项研究,298例患者,496个病变。我们的荟萃分析显示整体局部肿瘤控制率(LTC)为72% (95% CI: 65-79%)。1年、3年和5年的LTC率分别为83% (95% CI: 76-88%)、72% (95% CI: 64-78%)和69% (95% CI: 61-76%)。1年、3年和5年的无进展生存期(PFS)估计分别为67% (95% CI: 50-80%)、56% (95% CI: 48-64%)和51% (95% CI: 39-63%)。此外,5年总生存率(OS)为58% (95% CI: 48-67%)。不良辐射事件(ARE)发生率为20% (95% CI: 12-31%)。meta回归显示,年龄越大,肿瘤控制越好(P = 0.02), ARE (P = 0.06)和放射性坏死率越低(P)。结论:SRS是WHO级2/3 CNS室管膜瘤多模式治疗中合理有价值的治疗选择,特别是对于不能手术、复发或残留病变的患者。分析了关键的患者和肿瘤特征,以确定可能影响治疗结果的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信