Developing and Validating Models to Predict Suboptimal Early Glycemic Control Among Individuals With Younger Onset Type 2 Diabetes.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Care Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-09 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002164
Anjali Gopalan, Christine A Board, Stacey E Alexeeff, Joshua R Nugent, Pranita Mishra, Andrew J Karter, Richard W Grant
{"title":"Developing and Validating Models to Predict Suboptimal Early Glycemic Control Among Individuals With Younger Onset Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Anjali Gopalan, Christine A Board, Stacey E Alexeeff, Joshua R Nugent, Pranita Mishra, Andrew J Karter, Richard W Grant","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Younger age at the time of type 2 diabetes onset increases individuals' future complication risk. Proactively identifying younger-onset individuals at increased risk of not achieving early glycemic goals can support targeted initial care.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>Individuals (ages 21-44) newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were identified and randomly assigned to training (70%) and validation (30%) datasets. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression models were specified to identify key predictors (assessed at diagnosis) of suboptimal glycemic control (HbA1c≥8%) within 1 year after diagnosis using the training dataset. The full model included 48 candidate predictors. We also developed additional more streamlined models using more widely available predictors (transferable model), a smaller number of available predictors (simplified transferable model), and a bivariate model with HbA1c as the sole predictor (HbA1c-only model). Model-based predicted risk scores were used to stratify individuals in the validation dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 10,879 individuals. All of the models, including the HbA1c-only model, performed comparably. All had good discrimination (C-statistics ranging from 0.71 to 0.73) in the validation dataset.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When predicting the risk of not achieving glycemic goals, the HbA1c-only model had comparable performance to the more complex prediction models. This simple risk stratification requires no computation and could be implemented simply by looking at the diagnosis HbA1c value. This practical approach can be used to identify newly diagnosed younger adults who may need extra attention during the critical early period after diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":" ","pages":"614-623"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Younger age at the time of type 2 diabetes onset increases individuals' future complication risk. Proactively identifying younger-onset individuals at increased risk of not achieving early glycemic goals can support targeted initial care.

Design and methods: Individuals (ages 21-44) newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were identified and randomly assigned to training (70%) and validation (30%) datasets. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression models were specified to identify key predictors (assessed at diagnosis) of suboptimal glycemic control (HbA1c≥8%) within 1 year after diagnosis using the training dataset. The full model included 48 candidate predictors. We also developed additional more streamlined models using more widely available predictors (transferable model), a smaller number of available predictors (simplified transferable model), and a bivariate model with HbA1c as the sole predictor (HbA1c-only model). Model-based predicted risk scores were used to stratify individuals in the validation dataset.

Results: The cohort included 10,879 individuals. All of the models, including the HbA1c-only model, performed comparably. All had good discrimination (C-statistics ranging from 0.71 to 0.73) in the validation dataset.

Conclusions: When predicting the risk of not achieving glycemic goals, the HbA1c-only model had comparable performance to the more complex prediction models. This simple risk stratification requires no computation and could be implemented simply by looking at the diagnosis HbA1c value. This practical approach can be used to identify newly diagnosed younger adults who may need extra attention during the critical early period after diagnosis.

发展和验证模型预测亚理想的早期血糖控制在年轻的2型糖尿病患者。
目的:2型糖尿病发病年龄越小,个体未来并发症风险越高。积极地识别年轻发病的个体,在没有达到早期血糖目标的风险增加,可以支持有针对性的初始护理。设计和方法:确定新诊断为2型糖尿病的个体(21-44岁),并随机分配到训练(70%)和验证(30%)数据集。使用训练数据集,指定最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归模型,以确定诊断后1年内血糖控制不佳(HbA1c≥8%)的关键预测因子(在诊断时评估)。完整的模型包括48个候选预测因子。我们还开发了其他更精简的模型,使用更广泛可用的预测因子(可转移模型),可用的预测因子数量较少(简化可转移模型),以及以HbA1c为唯一预测因子的双变量模型(仅HbA1c模型)。使用基于模型的预测风险评分对验证数据集中的个体进行分层。结果:该队列包括10,879名个体。所有模型,包括仅含hba1c的模型,表现都相当。在验证数据集中均具有良好的判别性(c统计量范围为0.71 ~ 0.73)。结论:在预测未达到血糖目标的风险时,仅hba1c模型与更复杂的预测模型具有相当的性能。这种简单的风险分层不需要计算,只需查看诊断HbA1c值即可实现。这种实用的方法可用于识别新诊断的年轻人,他们可能需要在诊断后的关键早期给予额外的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信