The 'totality of evidence' and 'extrapolation' of SB17, a ustekinumab biosimilar.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Jae Hee Cheon, Byong Duk Ye, Alessandro Armuzzi, Florian Rieder, Giampiero Girolomoni, Luis Puig, Hojung Jung, Steven R Feldman
{"title":"The 'totality of evidence' and 'extrapolation' of SB17, a ustekinumab biosimilar.","authors":"Jae Hee Cheon, Byong Duk Ye, Alessandro Armuzzi, Florian Rieder, Giampiero Girolomoni, Luis Puig, Hojung Jung, Steven R Feldman","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2508838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>SB17 is a ustekinumab (UST) biosimilar targeting interleukin-12/23 for treating immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). The development of UST biosimilars like SB17 may help address the high cost of innovator biologics, offering affordable alternatives without compromising efficacy or safety.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review encompasses the totality of evidence supporting SB17's similarity to UST, its regulatory approval, and indication extrapolation. It also discusses SB17's lower immunogenicity relative to UST.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The approval of UST biosimilars represents a significant advancement in managing chronic IMIDs including psoriasis, plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis, providing cost-effective, efficacious alternatives. A randomized double-blind 28-week study involving over 500 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis demonstrated SB17's equivalence to UST, with more than 80% of patients achieving over 90% improvement in psoriasis severity indices. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between SB17 and UST. Despite their potential to transform clinical outcomes, economic burdens, and drug utilization patterns, the adoption of UST biosimilars faces challenges, including concerns about equivalence and regulatory inconsistencies. Addressing these issues through education, consistent regulatory frameworks, real-world data, and ongoing monitoring is crucial for their successful integration into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2508838","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: SB17 is a ustekinumab (UST) biosimilar targeting interleukin-12/23 for treating immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). The development of UST biosimilars like SB17 may help address the high cost of innovator biologics, offering affordable alternatives without compromising efficacy or safety.

Areas covered: This review encompasses the totality of evidence supporting SB17's similarity to UST, its regulatory approval, and indication extrapolation. It also discusses SB17's lower immunogenicity relative to UST.

Expert opinion: The approval of UST biosimilars represents a significant advancement in managing chronic IMIDs including psoriasis, plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis, providing cost-effective, efficacious alternatives. A randomized double-blind 28-week study involving over 500 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis demonstrated SB17's equivalence to UST, with more than 80% of patients achieving over 90% improvement in psoriasis severity indices. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between SB17 and UST. Despite their potential to transform clinical outcomes, economic burdens, and drug utilization patterns, the adoption of UST biosimilars faces challenges, including concerns about equivalence and regulatory inconsistencies. Addressing these issues through education, consistent regulatory frameworks, real-world data, and ongoing monitoring is crucial for their successful integration into clinical practice.

ustekinumab生物仿制药SB17的“证据总体”和“外推”。
SB17是一种针对白细胞介素-12/23的ustekinumab (UST)生物类似药,用于治疗免疫药物炎症性疾病(IMIDs)。像SB17这样的UST生物仿制药的开发可能有助于解决创新生物制剂的高成本问题,在不影响疗效或安全性的情况下提供负担得起的替代品。涵盖领域:本综述包括支持SB17与UST相似性的全部证据,其监管批准和适应症外推。本文还讨论了SB17相对于UST具有较低的免疫原性。专家意见:UST生物仿制药的批准代表了治疗慢性IMIDs(包括牛皮癣、斑块型牛皮癣、银屑病关节炎、克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎)的重大进步,提供了成本效益高、有效的替代方案。一项涉及500多名中重度慢性斑块型银屑病患者的28周随机双盲研究表明,SB17与UST等效,超过80%的患者银屑病严重程度指数改善超过90%。治疗中出现的不良事件在SB17和UST之间具有可比性。尽管它们有可能改变临床结果、经济负担和药物利用模式,但采用UST生物仿制药面临挑战,包括对等效性和监管不一致的担忧。通过教育、一致的监管框架、真实世界数据和持续监测来解决这些问题,对于将其成功整合到临床实践中至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease. The journal welcomes: Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results; Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信