Expert consensus on the application of dry needling in stroke patients: A modified delphi method.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Jorge Velázquez-Saornil, Vanesa Abuín-Porras, Raúl Frutos-Llanes, José Manuel Barragan-Casas, Angélica Campón-Chekroun, Zacarías Sánchez-Milá
{"title":"Expert consensus on the application of dry needling in stroke patients: A modified delphi method.","authors":"Jorge Velázquez-Saornil, Vanesa Abuín-Porras, Raúl Frutos-Llanes, José Manuel Barragan-Casas, Angélica Campón-Chekroun, Zacarías Sánchez-Milá","doi":"10.1177/02692155251342071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study aimed to establish an expert consensus on the use of dry needling for treating spasticity in stroke patients via the Delphi method.DesignA modified Delphi technique was conducted over four rounds.SettingThe study was guided by the NEUMUSK Group Research, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences. Ávila Catholic University, following the Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS).ParticipantsA total of 102 international experts in stroke rehabilitation and dry needling collaborated on this consensus study.InterventionPanellists rated 35 key questions across rounds via a 6-point Likert scale. Questions that failed to reach 70% consensus were eliminated.Main measurementsValidated Likert scale responses to carry out the expert consensus.ResultsThere was a high level of consensus regarding the use of dry needling in the early spasticity and hypertonia phases of stroke rehabilitation (early spasticity defined as the first few weeks after stroke when increased muscle tone begins to appear), with 87% and 91% agreement, respectively. However, less consensus has been reached for its application in hypotonia. Local twitch responses have been identified as critical indicators of treatment success, and ultrasound-guided dry needling has been widely endorsed for its precision. The effects of dry needling were reported to last between 48 and 72 h.ConclusionThis study provides clear recommendations for the use of dry needling in stroke patients, particularly during the early stages of spasticity. While the short-term benefits are evident, further research is needed to optimize the treatment frequency and explore its role in different stages of recovery, such as hypotonia. This consensus will aid healthcare professionals in integrating dry needling into comprehensive stroke rehabilitation programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155251342071"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251342071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to establish an expert consensus on the use of dry needling for treating spasticity in stroke patients via the Delphi method.DesignA modified Delphi technique was conducted over four rounds.SettingThe study was guided by the NEUMUSK Group Research, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences. Ávila Catholic University, following the Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS).ParticipantsA total of 102 international experts in stroke rehabilitation and dry needling collaborated on this consensus study.InterventionPanellists rated 35 key questions across rounds via a 6-point Likert scale. Questions that failed to reach 70% consensus were eliminated.Main measurementsValidated Likert scale responses to carry out the expert consensus.ResultsThere was a high level of consensus regarding the use of dry needling in the early spasticity and hypertonia phases of stroke rehabilitation (early spasticity defined as the first few weeks after stroke when increased muscle tone begins to appear), with 87% and 91% agreement, respectively. However, less consensus has been reached for its application in hypotonia. Local twitch responses have been identified as critical indicators of treatment success, and ultrasound-guided dry needling has been widely endorsed for its precision. The effects of dry needling were reported to last between 48 and 72 h.ConclusionThis study provides clear recommendations for the use of dry needling in stroke patients, particularly during the early stages of spasticity. While the short-term benefits are evident, further research is needed to optimize the treatment frequency and explore its role in different stages of recovery, such as hypotonia. This consensus will aid healthcare professionals in integrating dry needling into comprehensive stroke rehabilitation programmes.

干针在脑卒中患者应用的专家共识:一种改进的德尔菲法。
目的通过德尔菲法探讨干针治疗脑卒中痉挛的专家共识。DesignA改良的德尔菲法进行了4轮。该研究由健康科学学院物理治疗系NEUMUSK小组研究指导。Ávila天主教大学,根据调查研究报告核对表(CROSS)。共有102名国际脑卒中康复和干针专家参与了这项共识研究。干预小组成员通过6分李克特量表对35个关键问题进行了评分。未能达到70%共识的问题将被淘汰。主要测量方法:验证李克特量表反应,执行专家共识。结果在卒中康复的早期痉挛期和高张力期(早期痉挛期定义为卒中后最初几周,肌肉张力开始增加)使用干针的一致性很高,分别为87%和91%。然而,其在肌张力过低中的应用尚未达成共识。局部抽搐反应已被确定为治疗成功的关键指标,超声引导干针刺因其精度而得到广泛认可。据报道,干针刺的效果持续48至72小时。结论:本研究明确推荐干针在脑卒中患者中的应用,特别是在痉挛早期。虽然短期疗效明显,但仍需进一步研究优化治疗频率,并探索其在不同康复阶段(如肌张力过低)中的作用。这一共识将有助于医疗保健专业人员将干针纳入全面的中风康复方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信