The Effects of Medical and Recreational Cannabis Laws on Prescription Drug Claims in Commercial Group Insurance Markets

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Health economics Pub Date : 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1002/hec.4967
Amanda C. Cook, E. Tice Sirmans, Rhet A. Smith
{"title":"The Effects of Medical and Recreational Cannabis Laws on Prescription Drug Claims in Commercial Group Insurance Markets","authors":"Amanda C. Cook,&nbsp;E. Tice Sirmans,&nbsp;Rhet A. Smith","doi":"10.1002/hec.4967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Initially introduced as an alternative medical treatment, cannabis has been conditionally legalized in most U.S. states. Using prescription drug claims as reported by small and large group insurers in the NAIC Supplemental Health Care Exhibit from 2010–2019, we examine the impact of medical and recreational cannabis laws on prescription drug expenditures of working-age individuals. We use a difference-in-differences framework and find significant reductions in prescription drug claims per enrollee of $34–42 annually in the small group insurance market following recreational cannabis legalization. While we do not observe similar reductions in claims in large group insurance markets, we find weak evidence that the reduced expenditures in small group insurance correspond with reductions in premiums indicating positive spillover effects from recreational cannabis for insured enrollees of small group insurance plans.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":"34 8","pages":"1396-1409"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.4967","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Initially introduced as an alternative medical treatment, cannabis has been conditionally legalized in most U.S. states. Using prescription drug claims as reported by small and large group insurers in the NAIC Supplemental Health Care Exhibit from 2010–2019, we examine the impact of medical and recreational cannabis laws on prescription drug expenditures of working-age individuals. We use a difference-in-differences framework and find significant reductions in prescription drug claims per enrollee of $34–42 annually in the small group insurance market following recreational cannabis legalization. While we do not observe similar reductions in claims in large group insurance markets, we find weak evidence that the reduced expenditures in small group insurance correspond with reductions in premiums indicating positive spillover effects from recreational cannabis for insured enrollees of small group insurance plans.

医疗和娱乐大麻法律对商业团体保险市场处方药索赔的影响。
大麻最初是作为一种替代疗法引入的,在美国大多数州已经有条件地合法化。利用2010-2019年NAIC补充医疗保健展览中小型和大型集团保险公司报告的处方药索赔,我们研究了医疗和娱乐大麻法律对工作年龄个人处方药支出的影响。我们使用差异中的差异框架,发现在休闲大麻合法化后的小团体保险市场上,每位参保人的处方药索赔每年显著减少34-42美元。虽然我们没有观察到大型团体保险市场索赔的类似减少,但我们发现微弱的证据表明,小型团体保险支出的减少与保费的减少相对应,这表明娱乐大麻对小型团体保险计划的参保人员产生了积极的溢出效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health economics
Health economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems. Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses. Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信