Location, Payer Type, and Gender as Drivers of Burn Scar Reconstruction Utilization: A Burn Model Systems National Database Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-15 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004360
Erin E Ross, Alyssa Bamer, Samuel Mandell, Jeremy Goverman, Barclay Stewart, Haig A Yenikomshian
{"title":"Location, Payer Type, and Gender as Drivers of Burn Scar Reconstruction Utilization: A Burn Model Systems National Database Study.","authors":"Erin E Ross, Alyssa Bamer, Samuel Mandell, Jeremy Goverman, Barclay Stewart, Haig A Yenikomshian","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are demographic and socioeconomic disparities in physical and psychosocial outcomes after burn injury. Here, we assess the demographic and geographic variation in utilization of burn scar reconstruction to assess if such barriers to these procedures may be contributing to disparities in outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data from adults enrolled in the Burn Model System National Database between 2015 and 2022. Undergoing burn scar reconstruction, defined as surgery for burn scars or laser scar revision, by 24 months after discharge was compared across age group (18-64 vs 65+ years), gender, race/ethnicity, payer type, and enrollment site. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess use of burn scar reconstruction by demographic characteristics while adjusting for presence of range of motion deficits at discharge, hand burn, head/neck burn, and upper arm/shoulder burn.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the unadjusted analysis (N = 836), burn scar reconstruction use by 24 months differed by age group (<0.001), race/ethnicity ( P = 0.014), payer type ( P < 0.001), and enrollment site ( P < 0.001). By multiple logistic regression (n = 717), burn scar reconstruction was associated with female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.89, P = 0.002), workers' compensation (OR 3.41, P < 0.001), enrollment at site 1 or site 2 (OR 6.02, P < 0.001; OR 4.09, P < 0.001), hand burns (OR 2.35, P < 0.001), and upper arm/shoulder burns (OR 2.34, <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Location, payer type, and gender were primary drivers of burn scar reconstruction use after adjusting for burn characteristics. Geographic variability in burn scar reconstruction use may reflect less dependence on surgery to achieve favorable functional outcomes; however, these differences may represent barriers requiring further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"146-150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are demographic and socioeconomic disparities in physical and psychosocial outcomes after burn injury. Here, we assess the demographic and geographic variation in utilization of burn scar reconstruction to assess if such barriers to these procedures may be contributing to disparities in outcomes.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data from adults enrolled in the Burn Model System National Database between 2015 and 2022. Undergoing burn scar reconstruction, defined as surgery for burn scars or laser scar revision, by 24 months after discharge was compared across age group (18-64 vs 65+ years), gender, race/ethnicity, payer type, and enrollment site. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess use of burn scar reconstruction by demographic characteristics while adjusting for presence of range of motion deficits at discharge, hand burn, head/neck burn, and upper arm/shoulder burn.

Results: In the unadjusted analysis (N = 836), burn scar reconstruction use by 24 months differed by age group (<0.001), race/ethnicity ( P = 0.014), payer type ( P < 0.001), and enrollment site ( P < 0.001). By multiple logistic regression (n = 717), burn scar reconstruction was associated with female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.89, P = 0.002), workers' compensation (OR 3.41, P < 0.001), enrollment at site 1 or site 2 (OR 6.02, P < 0.001; OR 4.09, P < 0.001), hand burns (OR 2.35, P < 0.001), and upper arm/shoulder burns (OR 2.34, <0.001).

Conclusions: Location, payer type, and gender were primary drivers of burn scar reconstruction use after adjusting for burn characteristics. Geographic variability in burn scar reconstruction use may reflect less dependence on surgery to achieve favorable functional outcomes; however, these differences may represent barriers requiring further evaluation.

地点、付款人类型和性别是烧伤疤痕重建利用的驱动因素:一项烧伤模型系统国家数据库研究。
背景:在烧伤后的身体和社会心理结局方面存在人口统计学和社会经济差异。在这里,我们评估了使用烧伤疤痕重建的人口统计学和地理差异,以评估这些程序的障碍是否可能导致结果的差异。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,前瞻性地收集了2015年至2022年间在烧伤模型系统国家数据库中登记的成年人的数据。出院后24个月接受烧伤疤痕重建(定义为烧伤疤痕手术或激光疤痕修复)的患者在不同年龄组(18-64岁vs 65岁以上)、性别、种族/民族、付款人类型和登记地点进行比较。在调整出院时运动范围缺陷、手部烧伤、头/颈部烧伤和上臂/肩部烧伤的存在情况的同时,通过人口统计学特征,采用多元逻辑回归来评估烧伤疤痕重建的使用。结果:在未经调整的分析中(N = 836), 24个月后烧伤疤痕重建的使用因年龄组而异(结论:在调整烧伤特征后,地点、付款人类型和性别是烧伤疤痕重建使用的主要驱动因素。烧伤瘢痕重建应用的地域差异可能反映了较少依赖手术来获得良好的功能结果;然而,这些差异可能是需要进一步评估的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信