The Pattern, Management, and Outcomes of Recurrence Following Cytoreductive Surgery for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Rennie Xinrui Qin, Tilisi Puloka, Jia Hui Lim, Caro Staheli, Simione Lolohea, Jasen Ly, Jesse Fischer
{"title":"The Pattern, Management, and Outcomes of Recurrence Following Cytoreductive Surgery for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei.","authors":"Rennie Xinrui Qin, Tilisi Puloka, Jia Hui Lim, Caro Staheli, Simione Lolohea, Jasen Ly, Jesse Fischer","doi":"10.1111/ans.70179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>We aimed to assess the pattern, management, and outcomes of recurrent pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and compare repeat and index CRS/HIPEC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for PMP between 01/01/2008 and 30/06/2022 at a tertiary referral center in New Zealand. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of repeat CRS/HIPEC. Overall survival (OS) of PMP recurrence was stratified according to management strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 183 primary CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal PMP, 154 (84.2%) achieved complete cytoreduction. Median follow-up duration was 72.1 months. Forty-nine recurred (31.8%). 40 (81.6%) cases of recurrence were isolated to the peritoneal cavity, and 47 (95.9%) occurred within 5 years. 27 (55.1%) underwent repeat curative-intent surgery. 22 (44.9%) were managed with palliative intent. Age > 65 and high-grade carcinoma peritonei (HG) were independent negative predictors of repeat curative-intent surgery. Five-year overall survival was significantly higher in patients undergoing repeat curative-intent surgery (80.3%) compared to those managed with palliative intent (44.8%) (HR = 0.23, p < 0.001). Curative-intent repeat surgery was an independent predictor of overall survival in PMP recurrences. Compared to primary CRS/HIPEC, repeat CRS/HIPEC were less extensive procedures conducted in cases with a lower peritoneal cancer index. Repeat CRS/HIPEC had similar peri-operative morbidity and long-term survival to primary procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Repeat CRS/HIPEC for recurrent PMP is feasible and has similar safety and efficacy to index operations. Favorable long-term outcomes are achievable in well-selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: We aimed to assess the pattern, management, and outcomes of recurrent pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and compare repeat and index CRS/HIPEC.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for PMP between 01/01/2008 and 30/06/2022 at a tertiary referral center in New Zealand. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of repeat CRS/HIPEC. Overall survival (OS) of PMP recurrence was stratified according to management strategy.

Results: Among 183 primary CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal PMP, 154 (84.2%) achieved complete cytoreduction. Median follow-up duration was 72.1 months. Forty-nine recurred (31.8%). 40 (81.6%) cases of recurrence were isolated to the peritoneal cavity, and 47 (95.9%) occurred within 5 years. 27 (55.1%) underwent repeat curative-intent surgery. 22 (44.9%) were managed with palliative intent. Age > 65 and high-grade carcinoma peritonei (HG) were independent negative predictors of repeat curative-intent surgery. Five-year overall survival was significantly higher in patients undergoing repeat curative-intent surgery (80.3%) compared to those managed with palliative intent (44.8%) (HR = 0.23, p < 0.001). Curative-intent repeat surgery was an independent predictor of overall survival in PMP recurrences. Compared to primary CRS/HIPEC, repeat CRS/HIPEC were less extensive procedures conducted in cases with a lower peritoneal cancer index. Repeat CRS/HIPEC had similar peri-operative morbidity and long-term survival to primary procedures.

Conclusions: Repeat CRS/HIPEC for recurrent PMP is feasible and has similar safety and efficacy to index operations. Favorable long-term outcomes are achievable in well-selected patients.

腹膜假性黏液瘤细胞减少手术后复发的模式、处理和结果。
背景:我们旨在评估细胞减少手术(CRS)和腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)后复发性腹膜假性黏液瘤(PMP)的模式、管理和结局,并比较重复和指数CRS/HIPEC。方法:回顾性分析2008年1月1日至2022年6月30日在新西兰某三级转诊中心接受CRS/HIPEC治疗PMP的患者。采用多变量logistic回归确定重复CRS/HIPEC的独立预测因素。根据治疗策略对PMP复发患者的总生存期(OS)进行分层。结果:在183例阑尾PMP的原发性CRS/HIPEC中,154例(84.2%)实现了完全的细胞减少。中位随访时间为72.1个月。49例复发(31.8%)。单纯腹腔复发40例(81.6%),5年内复发47例(95.9%)。27例(55.1%)接受了多次治疗目的手术。22例(44.9%)采用姑息治疗。年龄bbb65岁和高级别腹膜癌(HG)是重复治疗目的手术的独立阴性预测因子。重复治疗目的手术患者的5年总生存率(80.3%)明显高于缓解目的手术患者(44.8%)(HR = 0.23, p)。结论:重复CRS/HIPEC治疗复发性PMP是可行的,其安全性和有效性与指数手术相似。在精心挑选的患者中,可以获得良好的长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信