Comparison of Different Risk Assessment Models for Predicting Postdischarge Phototherapy Requirement in Term and Late Preterm Neonates.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Selma Aktas, Enes Dursun, Irem Yasa, Bala Ascıoglu
{"title":"Comparison of Different Risk Assessment Models for Predicting Postdischarge Phototherapy Requirement in Term and Late Preterm Neonates.","authors":"Selma Aktas, Enes Dursun, Irem Yasa, Bala Ascıoglu","doi":"10.1055/a-2616-4116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was conducted to compare the Bhutani nomogram and the difference between the total serum bilirubin measurement at discharge and the AAP phototherapy threshold at the time of measurement (Δ-TSB) for predicting the postdischarge bilirubin level that will exceed the phototherapy threshold.Healthy neonates born at ≥35 weeks of gestation, followed in the newborn nursery, who did not receive phototherapy during hospital stay after birth, and who followed up in the outpatient clinic at least for 1 month from 2019 to 2024 were included in the study. Four logistic models were compared (D-TSB-plus,which encompassed additional variables such as gestational age, delivery type, and blood incompatibility, and DAT positivity, the Bhutani risk zones, and Bhutani-plus which encompassed additional variables such as gestational age, delivery type, and blood incompatibility) to predict postdischarge phototherapy requirement.Of the 2,040 neonates included in the study, 208 were readmitted for phototherapy treatment after discharge. ABO and/or Rh incompatibility, Bhutani risk zone, lower gestational age, and being born vaginally increased the need for phototherapy. Δ-TSB was the strongest predictor of postdischarge phototherapy requirement (<i>p</i> < 10<sup>-50</sup>). Among the logistic models, the Δ-TSB-plus model had the highest predictive power (AUC: 0.83), followed by Δ-TSB alone (AUC: 0.82), Bhutani-plus (AUC: 0.80) and Bhutani alone (AUC: 0.74) models, respectively.Δ-TSB models had higher predictive ability regarding postdischarge phototherapy requirement compared with Bhutani models. Combining Bhutani risk zones with risk factors, especially with gestational age, increased the discrimination but did not reach the success of Δ-TSB models. · It is important to predict neonates likely to develop jaundice to start treatment in a timely manner.. · Combining bilirubin measurement with hemolysis findings and clinical parameters improves the prediction of postdischarge phototherapy.. · Δ-TSB model appears to be the strongest model for the prediction of postdischarge phototherapy requirement..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2616-4116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the Bhutani nomogram and the difference between the total serum bilirubin measurement at discharge and the AAP phototherapy threshold at the time of measurement (Δ-TSB) for predicting the postdischarge bilirubin level that will exceed the phototherapy threshold.Healthy neonates born at ≥35 weeks of gestation, followed in the newborn nursery, who did not receive phototherapy during hospital stay after birth, and who followed up in the outpatient clinic at least for 1 month from 2019 to 2024 were included in the study. Four logistic models were compared (D-TSB-plus,which encompassed additional variables such as gestational age, delivery type, and blood incompatibility, and DAT positivity, the Bhutani risk zones, and Bhutani-plus which encompassed additional variables such as gestational age, delivery type, and blood incompatibility) to predict postdischarge phototherapy requirement.Of the 2,040 neonates included in the study, 208 were readmitted for phototherapy treatment after discharge. ABO and/or Rh incompatibility, Bhutani risk zone, lower gestational age, and being born vaginally increased the need for phototherapy. Δ-TSB was the strongest predictor of postdischarge phototherapy requirement (p < 10-50). Among the logistic models, the Δ-TSB-plus model had the highest predictive power (AUC: 0.83), followed by Δ-TSB alone (AUC: 0.82), Bhutani-plus (AUC: 0.80) and Bhutani alone (AUC: 0.74) models, respectively.Δ-TSB models had higher predictive ability regarding postdischarge phototherapy requirement compared with Bhutani models. Combining Bhutani risk zones with risk factors, especially with gestational age, increased the discrimination but did not reach the success of Δ-TSB models. · It is important to predict neonates likely to develop jaundice to start treatment in a timely manner.. · Combining bilirubin measurement with hemolysis findings and clinical parameters improves the prediction of postdischarge phototherapy.. · Δ-TSB model appears to be the strongest model for the prediction of postdischarge phototherapy requirement..

不同风险评估模型预测足月和晚期早产儿出院后光疗需求的比较。
目的:本研究比较Bhutani图及出院时血清总胆红素测量值与测量时AAP光疗阈值(Δ-TSB)的差异,以预测出院后胆红素水平将超过光疗阈值。研究设计:纳入2019 - 2024年在新生儿护理室随访、出生后住院期间未接受光疗且门诊随访至少1个月的≥35周妊娠期健康新生儿。我们比较了四种逻辑模型(Δ-TSB, Δ-TSB-plus,包括胎龄、分娩类型、血液不相容和DAT阳性等附加变量,Bhutani危险区和Bhutani-plus,包括胎龄、分娩类型、血液不相容等附加变量),以预测出院后光治疗需求。结果:纳入研究的2040例新生儿中,208例出院后再次入院接受光疗治疗。ABO和/或Rh不相容、不丹危险区、低胎龄、顺产增加了光疗的需求。结论:Δ-TSB模型对出院后光疗需求的预测能力高于Bhutani模型。将不丹危险区域与危险因素结合起来,特别是与胎龄结合起来,增加了歧视,但没有达到Δ-TSB模式的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信