Can Non-Neurosurgeons Operate on Traumatic Brain Injuries in Non-Metropolitan Areas? A Scoping Review

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Lauren Bosley, Clinton Gibbs, Eunah Joo, Geoffrey Dobson
{"title":"Can Non-Neurosurgeons Operate on Traumatic Brain Injuries in Non-Metropolitan Areas? A Scoping Review","authors":"Lauren Bosley,&nbsp;Clinton Gibbs,&nbsp;Eunah Joo,&nbsp;Geoffrey Dobson","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) with increased intracranial pressure (ICP) require time-sensitive surgical intervention. In non-metropolitan areas, neurosurgeons are often unavailable to provide definitive treatment. Therapeutic surgical intervention by a non-neurosurgeon, for example, general surgeons, is a potential alternative; however, the feasibility and utility of non-specialist intervention are poorly defined within the literature. A scoping review was conducted within Scopus, Emcare, MEDLINE and CINAHL for original literature about emergency neurosurgical interventions performed by a non-neurosurgeon for TBIs in non-metropolitan settings without prompt access to a neurosurgeon. This search yielded 20 studies that included over 2000 surgical interventions in 13 countries. General surgeons most commonly performed the procedures on patients with computed tomography (CT)-confirmed lesions. Mortality rates were heterogeneous, ranging from 0% to 67% in small cohorts with variable follow-up periods. Mortality was consistently higher in patients with subdural haematomas (SDHs) opposed to extradural haematomas (EDHs). Morbidity was measured in 13 studies, commonly via the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS). Most studies had access to remote neurosurgical advice via telehealth. Overall, these 20 studies provided incomplete information regarding mortality rates and functional outcomes from this alternative practise. The present study concludes that emergency decompression by a non-neurosurgeon for patients with severe TBIs may be lifesaving for patients without timely access to a neurosurgical centre. Our study further highlights the need for further research, training and resource allocation, including strengthening telecommunication pathways, to support patient access to lifesaving neurosurgical interventions in these environments, and ultimately address surgical inequalities in rural and remote regions of the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.70055","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) with increased intracranial pressure (ICP) require time-sensitive surgical intervention. In non-metropolitan areas, neurosurgeons are often unavailable to provide definitive treatment. Therapeutic surgical intervention by a non-neurosurgeon, for example, general surgeons, is a potential alternative; however, the feasibility and utility of non-specialist intervention are poorly defined within the literature. A scoping review was conducted within Scopus, Emcare, MEDLINE and CINAHL for original literature about emergency neurosurgical interventions performed by a non-neurosurgeon for TBIs in non-metropolitan settings without prompt access to a neurosurgeon. This search yielded 20 studies that included over 2000 surgical interventions in 13 countries. General surgeons most commonly performed the procedures on patients with computed tomography (CT)-confirmed lesions. Mortality rates were heterogeneous, ranging from 0% to 67% in small cohorts with variable follow-up periods. Mortality was consistently higher in patients with subdural haematomas (SDHs) opposed to extradural haematomas (EDHs). Morbidity was measured in 13 studies, commonly via the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS). Most studies had access to remote neurosurgical advice via telehealth. Overall, these 20 studies provided incomplete information regarding mortality rates and functional outcomes from this alternative practise. The present study concludes that emergency decompression by a non-neurosurgeon for patients with severe TBIs may be lifesaving for patients without timely access to a neurosurgical centre. Our study further highlights the need for further research, training and resource allocation, including strengthening telecommunication pathways, to support patient access to lifesaving neurosurgical interventions in these environments, and ultimately address surgical inequalities in rural and remote regions of the world.

Abstract Image

非神经外科医生可以在非大都市地区进行创伤性脑损伤手术吗?范围检讨
颅内压增高的外伤性脑损伤(tbi)需要及时的手术干预。在非大都市地区,神经外科医生往往无法提供明确的治疗。由非神经外科医生(例如,普通外科医生)进行的治疗性手术干预是一种潜在的替代方案;然而,非专业干预的可行性和效用在文献中定义不清。在Scopus、Emcare、MEDLINE和CINAHL中进行了一项范围审查,以获取有关在非大都市环境中由非神经外科医生对tbi进行紧急神经外科干预的原始文献,而没有及时获得神经外科医生的帮助。这项搜索产生了20项研究,其中包括13个国家的2000多例外科手术。普通外科医生最常对有计算机断层扫描(CT)证实病变的患者进行手术。死亡率是异质性的,在随访时间不同的小队列中,死亡率从0%到67%不等。与硬膜外血肿(EDHs)相比,硬膜下血肿(SDHs)患者的死亡率始终较高。发病率在13项研究中测量,通常通过格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS)。大多数研究都可以通过远程医疗获得远程神经外科建议。总的来说,这20项研究提供了关于这种替代做法的死亡率和功能结局的不完整信息。本研究的结论是,非神经外科医生对严重创伤性脑损伤患者的紧急减压可能会挽救无法及时进入神经外科中心的患者的生命。我们的研究进一步强调了进一步研究、培训和资源分配的必要性,包括加强电信途径,以支持患者在这些环境中获得挽救生命的神经外科干预措施,并最终解决世界农村和偏远地区的手术不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信