{"title":"Characterization and assessment of anisotropic constitutive models using the flat punch hole expansion test","authors":"A. Narayanan, J. Arciero, C. Tolton, C. Butcher","doi":"10.1007/s12289-025-01908-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Flat punch hole expansion tests are valuable for anisotropic plasticity model evaluation sine they activate a spectrum of tensile stress states across all in-plane material orientations. Pressure-independent yield functions with an associated flow rule typically overlook the state of plane strain tension (PST) during their calibration. Studies have shown that PST occurs near a principal stress ratio of 1:2 for materials that approximately follow deviatoric plasticity but this plane strain constraint (PSC) has been largely overlooked in anisotropic yield function calibration. This study proposes an efficient methodology to characterize and calibrate associated deviatoric plasticity models for materials with a broad range of anisotropy and hardening characteristics including AA5182-O and AA7075-T6 aluminum, and DC04 and 980GEN3 steels. The PST response was evaluated from notch tests using an inverse finite-element analysis approach with correlations provided when cruciform or notch test data is unavailable. The isotropic hardening assumption was evaluated to large strains by determining the stress response from analysis of area of the neck in tensile tests. The anisotropic Yld2000 and Yld2004 yield functions were calibrated to enforce the PSC, ensuring a zero plastic strain increment in directions without a deviatoric stress. The isotropic Hosford and quadratic Hill-48 functions, which universally satisfy and violate the PSC respectively, were also considered. Yield functions that enforced the PSC accurately predicted the global forces, strains, and PST locations in flat punch hole expansion simulations. In contrast, the Hill-48 model failed to accurately predict the radial distance from the hole in PST where the minor strain vanished, highlighting the importance of considering plane strain data for yield function calibration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":591,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Material Forming","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Material Forming","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12289-025-01908-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Flat punch hole expansion tests are valuable for anisotropic plasticity model evaluation sine they activate a spectrum of tensile stress states across all in-plane material orientations. Pressure-independent yield functions with an associated flow rule typically overlook the state of plane strain tension (PST) during their calibration. Studies have shown that PST occurs near a principal stress ratio of 1:2 for materials that approximately follow deviatoric plasticity but this plane strain constraint (PSC) has been largely overlooked in anisotropic yield function calibration. This study proposes an efficient methodology to characterize and calibrate associated deviatoric plasticity models for materials with a broad range of anisotropy and hardening characteristics including AA5182-O and AA7075-T6 aluminum, and DC04 and 980GEN3 steels. The PST response was evaluated from notch tests using an inverse finite-element analysis approach with correlations provided when cruciform or notch test data is unavailable. The isotropic hardening assumption was evaluated to large strains by determining the stress response from analysis of area of the neck in tensile tests. The anisotropic Yld2000 and Yld2004 yield functions were calibrated to enforce the PSC, ensuring a zero plastic strain increment in directions without a deviatoric stress. The isotropic Hosford and quadratic Hill-48 functions, which universally satisfy and violate the PSC respectively, were also considered. Yield functions that enforced the PSC accurately predicted the global forces, strains, and PST locations in flat punch hole expansion simulations. In contrast, the Hill-48 model failed to accurately predict the radial distance from the hole in PST where the minor strain vanished, highlighting the importance of considering plane strain data for yield function calibration.
期刊介绍:
The Journal publishes and disseminates original research in the field of material forming. The research should constitute major achievements in the understanding, modeling or simulation of material forming processes. In this respect ‘forming’ implies a deliberate deformation of material.
The journal establishes a platform of communication between engineers and scientists, covering all forming processes, including sheet forming, bulk forming, powder forming, forming in near-melt conditions (injection moulding, thixoforming, film blowing etc.), micro-forming, hydro-forming, thermo-forming, incremental forming etc. Other manufacturing technologies like machining and cutting can be included if the focus of the work is on plastic deformations.
All materials (metals, ceramics, polymers, composites, glass, wood, fibre reinforced materials, materials in food processing, biomaterials, nano-materials, shape memory alloys etc.) and approaches (micro-macro modelling, thermo-mechanical modelling, numerical simulation including new and advanced numerical strategies, experimental analysis, inverse analysis, model identification, optimization, design and control of forming tools and machines, wear and friction, mechanical behavior and formability of materials etc.) are concerned.