The economic factors that determine smoking abstinence: a survival and mediation analysis

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Yanyun He , Geoffrey T. Fong , K. Michael Cummings , Andrew Hyland , Roberta Freitas-Lemos , Ce Shang
{"title":"The economic factors that determine smoking abstinence: a survival and mediation analysis","authors":"Yanyun He ,&nbsp;Geoffrey T. Fong ,&nbsp;K. Michael Cummings ,&nbsp;Andrew Hyland ,&nbsp;Roberta Freitas-Lemos ,&nbsp;Ce Shang","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Higher taxes stimulate quit attempts and higher rates of smoking abstinence. Additionally, taxes on tobacco cigarettes and e-cigarettes (ECs) may influence consumers’ perceptions of the relative costs of these products. Understanding the relationship between cigarette and EC taxes, cost perceptions, and smoking abstinence is therefore crucial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study utilized longitudinal data from the US arm of the 2016–2020 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping (ITC 4CV) Surveys and implemented a survival analysis to explore the impact of cigarette and EC taxes on smoking abstinence. A mediation analysis was also performed to test whether the effects of taxes are influenced by individuals’ perceptions about the relative cost differences between ECs and cigarettes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A 10 % increase in cigarette taxes was associated with an 11.1 % increase in smoking abstinence. EC taxes were not associated with smoking abstinence among the overall sample. However, higher EC taxes were associated with greater odds of smoking abstinence among individuals over 40 and lower odds of smoking abstinence among individuals under 40. Relative cost perception did not mediate the effect of taxes on smoking abstinence. Additionally, the odds of quitting were higher among individuals in the high-income group and those who used ECs daily, and lower among individuals in older age groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cigarette taxes have a direct impact on smoking abstinence, independent of cost perceptions. To enhance cessation rates, policymakers should implement targeted strategies such as increasing access to cessation programs, providing financial incentives for quitting, and tailoring tax policies to better support older individuals and those with lower incomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 104852"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925001525","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Higher taxes stimulate quit attempts and higher rates of smoking abstinence. Additionally, taxes on tobacco cigarettes and e-cigarettes (ECs) may influence consumers’ perceptions of the relative costs of these products. Understanding the relationship between cigarette and EC taxes, cost perceptions, and smoking abstinence is therefore crucial.

Methods

This study utilized longitudinal data from the US arm of the 2016–2020 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping (ITC 4CV) Surveys and implemented a survival analysis to explore the impact of cigarette and EC taxes on smoking abstinence. A mediation analysis was also performed to test whether the effects of taxes are influenced by individuals’ perceptions about the relative cost differences between ECs and cigarettes.

Results

A 10 % increase in cigarette taxes was associated with an 11.1 % increase in smoking abstinence. EC taxes were not associated with smoking abstinence among the overall sample. However, higher EC taxes were associated with greater odds of smoking abstinence among individuals over 40 and lower odds of smoking abstinence among individuals under 40. Relative cost perception did not mediate the effect of taxes on smoking abstinence. Additionally, the odds of quitting were higher among individuals in the high-income group and those who used ECs daily, and lower among individuals in older age groups.

Conclusions

Cigarette taxes have a direct impact on smoking abstinence, independent of cost perceptions. To enhance cessation rates, policymakers should implement targeted strategies such as increasing access to cessation programs, providing financial incentives for quitting, and tailoring tax policies to better support older individuals and those with lower incomes.
决定戒烟的经济因素:生存与中介分析
高税收刺激了戒烟的尝试和更高的戒烟率。此外,烟草卷烟和电子烟的税收可能会影响消费者对这些产品相对成本的看法。因此,理解香烟和欧盟税、成本认知和戒烟之间的关系至关重要。方法:本研究利用2016-2020年国际烟草控制四国吸烟和电子烟(ITC 4CV)调查美国部门的纵向数据,并实施生存分析,探讨卷烟税和电子烟税对戒烟的影响。我们还进行了一项中介分析,以检验税收的影响是否受到个人对电子烟和香烟之间相对成本差异的看法的影响。结果每增加10%的卷烟税,戒烟率增加11.1%。在整个样本中,欧共体税与戒烟无关。然而,较高的欧共体税与40岁以上人群中戒烟的几率较高以及40岁以下人群中戒烟的几率较低相关。相对成本感知并没有调节税收对戒烟的影响。此外,高收入人群和每天使用电子烟的人戒烟的几率更高,而年龄较大的人群戒烟的几率更低。结论烟草税对戒烟有直接影响,与成本观念无关。为了提高戒烟率,政策制定者应实施有针对性的战略,如增加获得戒烟计划的机会,为戒烟提供财政激励,并调整税收政策,以更好地支持老年人和低收入者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信