Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Are Not Associated With Increased Incidence of Pneumonia After Endoscopic Procedures

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Natalia Tejada , Ishak Mansi , Silvio W. de Melo Jr
{"title":"Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Are Not Associated With Increased Incidence of Pneumonia After Endoscopic Procedures","authors":"Natalia Tejada ,&nbsp;Ishak Mansi ,&nbsp;Silvio W. de Melo Jr","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2025.250925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND AND AIMS</h3><div>Despite their favorable cardiometabolic effects, use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs), have raised concerns for increasing the risk of aspiration pneumonia after upper esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)/colonoscopy due to slowing gastrointestinal motility. Such risks are yet to be confirmed. This study aimed to examine the association of GLP1-RA use with risk of aspiration pneumonia or any pneumonia in patients undergoing these procedures.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>This retrospective, propensity score (PS)–matched cohort study, with active control design, used data from the Veterans Health Administration of veterans who underwent EGD/colonoscopy procedures during fiscal years 2016-2021 while using GLP1-RA or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i), as active comparators. A PS was created using 60 baseline characteristics encompassing demographics, laboratory investigations, medication use, and comorbidities that may increase risk of aspiration or infection. Our 2 coprimary outcomes were incidence of any pneumonia and incidence of aspiration pneumonia within 30 days of the procedure.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Of 59,280 EGD/colonoscopy procedures (22,570 GLP1-RA users and 36,710 DPP4i users), we successfully matched 15,943 pairs of patients. Mean (SD) age of patients was 66 (8) years and mean (SD) weighted Charlson comorbidity index was 4.8 (3.2). In the PS-matched cohort, 48 (0.3%) GLP1-RA users had pneumonia vs 57 (0.4%) DPP4i users (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.57-1.23), and 7 (0.04%) GLP1-RA users had aspiration pneumonia vs 9 (0.06%) DPP4i users (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.29-2.09).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Risks of aspiration pneumonia or any pneumonia after EGD/colonoscopy procedures were similar in GLP1-RA users and active comparators. Withholding GLP1-RA prior to endoscopic procedures may not be necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"27 3","pages":"Article 250925"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030725000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Despite their favorable cardiometabolic effects, use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs), have raised concerns for increasing the risk of aspiration pneumonia after upper esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)/colonoscopy due to slowing gastrointestinal motility. Such risks are yet to be confirmed. This study aimed to examine the association of GLP1-RA use with risk of aspiration pneumonia or any pneumonia in patients undergoing these procedures.

METHODS

This retrospective, propensity score (PS)–matched cohort study, with active control design, used data from the Veterans Health Administration of veterans who underwent EGD/colonoscopy procedures during fiscal years 2016-2021 while using GLP1-RA or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i), as active comparators. A PS was created using 60 baseline characteristics encompassing demographics, laboratory investigations, medication use, and comorbidities that may increase risk of aspiration or infection. Our 2 coprimary outcomes were incidence of any pneumonia and incidence of aspiration pneumonia within 30 days of the procedure.

RESULTS

Of 59,280 EGD/colonoscopy procedures (22,570 GLP1-RA users and 36,710 DPP4i users), we successfully matched 15,943 pairs of patients. Mean (SD) age of patients was 66 (8) years and mean (SD) weighted Charlson comorbidity index was 4.8 (3.2). In the PS-matched cohort, 48 (0.3%) GLP1-RA users had pneumonia vs 57 (0.4%) DPP4i users (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.57-1.23), and 7 (0.04%) GLP1-RA users had aspiration pneumonia vs 9 (0.06%) DPP4i users (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.29-2.09).

CONCLUSION

Risks of aspiration pneumonia or any pneumonia after EGD/colonoscopy procedures were similar in GLP1-RA users and active comparators. Withholding GLP1-RA prior to endoscopic procedures may not be necessary.
胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与内镜手术后肺炎发病率增加无关
背景和目的尽管胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP1-RAs)具有良好的心脏代谢作用,但由于胃肠道运动减慢,使用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP1-RAs)增加了上食管胃十二指肠镜(EGD)/结肠镜检查后吸入性肺炎的风险。这些风险尚未得到证实。本研究旨在检查GLP1-RA的使用与吸入性肺炎或任何肺炎的风险之间的关系。方法:这项回顾性、倾向评分(PS)匹配的队列研究采用主动对照设计,使用退伍军人健康管理局的数据,这些退伍军人在2016-2021财政年度接受EGD/结肠镜检查,同时使用GLP1-RA或二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP4i)作为主动比较物。PS使用60个基线特征创建,包括人口统计学、实验室调查、药物使用和可能增加误吸或感染风险的合并症。我们的两个主要结局是任何肺炎的发病率和手术后30天内吸入性肺炎的发病率。在59,280例EGD/结肠镜检查中(22,570例GLP1-RA使用者和36,710例DPP4i使用者),我们成功匹配了15,943对患者。患者平均(SD)年龄66(8)岁,平均(SD)加权Charlson合并症指数为4.8(3.2)。在ps匹配的队列中,48名(0.3%)GLP1-RA使用者患有肺炎,57名(0.4%)DPP4i使用者(优势比,0.84;95% CI, 0.57-1.23), GLP1-RA使用者有7例(0.04%)吸入性肺炎,而DPP4i使用者有9例(0.06%)吸入性肺炎(优势比,0.78;95% ci, 0.29-2.09)。结论:GLP1-RA使用者和活性对照者在EGD/结肠镜检查后发生吸入性肺炎或任何肺炎的风险相似。在内窥镜手术前保留GLP1-RA可能没有必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信