{"title":"Solution of stress and deformation field and inversion of material parameter for gravity dams based on physics-informed neural networks","authors":"Danni Luo , Haixing Mo , Qingbin Li , Xinxin Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.jocs.2025.102613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The stress and deformation analysis of concrete gravity dams is a core component of evaluating the structural safety of dam bodies. To obtain accurate and efficient solutions for the stress<img>deformation fields of gravity dams and fast inversion of material parameter, based on physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), we develop a residual minimization-based PINN model and a potential energy minimization-based EPINN model specifically targeted at gravity dams, which are grounded in the elasticity theory of solid mechanics. Through various case studies involving gravity dams, the computational accuracy and efficiency of different PINN models are compared. The results show the following: (1) The EPINN model demonstrates superior solving capability and computational efficiency—it is approximately 20 times faster than the PINN model—when dealing with complex geometries and boundary conditions. Conversely, the PINN model achieves higher computational accuracy for simpler geometries, with its precision being approximately twice that of the EPINN model. (2) Both models exhibit strong capabilities in material parameter inversion. In particular, the PINN model achieves accurate inversion of material properties via extremely limited data samples, with errors of only 0.46 % for the elastic modulus <em>E</em> and 2.32 % for Poisson's ratio <em>μ</em>. (3) The convergence performance of PINNs is influenced by factors such as the number of hidden layers, the number of neurons, and the test displacement functions. Overall, PINNs serve as a machine learning method that enables the direct construction of mechanistic models for gravity dams, contributing to the rapid and intelligent assessment of dam structural safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48907,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Science","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102613"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877750325000900","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The stress and deformation analysis of concrete gravity dams is a core component of evaluating the structural safety of dam bodies. To obtain accurate and efficient solutions for the stressdeformation fields of gravity dams and fast inversion of material parameter, based on physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), we develop a residual minimization-based PINN model and a potential energy minimization-based EPINN model specifically targeted at gravity dams, which are grounded in the elasticity theory of solid mechanics. Through various case studies involving gravity dams, the computational accuracy and efficiency of different PINN models are compared. The results show the following: (1) The EPINN model demonstrates superior solving capability and computational efficiency—it is approximately 20 times faster than the PINN model—when dealing with complex geometries and boundary conditions. Conversely, the PINN model achieves higher computational accuracy for simpler geometries, with its precision being approximately twice that of the EPINN model. (2) Both models exhibit strong capabilities in material parameter inversion. In particular, the PINN model achieves accurate inversion of material properties via extremely limited data samples, with errors of only 0.46 % for the elastic modulus E and 2.32 % for Poisson's ratio μ. (3) The convergence performance of PINNs is influenced by factors such as the number of hidden layers, the number of neurons, and the test displacement functions. Overall, PINNs serve as a machine learning method that enables the direct construction of mechanistic models for gravity dams, contributing to the rapid and intelligent assessment of dam structural safety.
期刊介绍:
Computational Science is a rapidly growing multi- and interdisciplinary field that uses advanced computing and data analysis to understand and solve complex problems. It has reached a level of predictive capability that now firmly complements the traditional pillars of experimentation and theory.
The recent advances in experimental techniques such as detectors, on-line sensor networks and high-resolution imaging techniques, have opened up new windows into physical and biological processes at many levels of detail. The resulting data explosion allows for detailed data driven modeling and simulation.
This new discipline in science combines computational thinking, modern computational methods, devices and collateral technologies to address problems far beyond the scope of traditional numerical methods.
Computational science typically unifies three distinct elements:
• Modeling, Algorithms and Simulations (e.g. numerical and non-numerical, discrete and continuous);
• Software developed to solve science (e.g., biological, physical, and social), engineering, medicine, and humanities problems;
• Computer and information science that develops and optimizes the advanced system hardware, software, networking, and data management components (e.g. problem solving environments).