ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Brain Tumors

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging, Jana Ivanidze MD, PhD , Robert Y. Shih MD , Pallavi S. Utukuri MD , Amna A. Ajam MD, MBBS , Moises Auron MD , Susan M. Chang MD , Justin T. Jordan MD, MPH , Aleks Kalnins MD, MBA , Phillip H. Kuo MD, PhD , Luke N. Ledbetter MD , Jeffrey S. Pannell MD , Jeffrey M. Pollock MD , Jason Sheehan MD, PhD , Bruno P. Soares MD , Karl A. Soderlund MD , Lily L. Wang MBBS, MPH , Judah Burns MD
{"title":"ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Brain Tumors","authors":"Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging,&nbsp;Jana Ivanidze MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Robert Y. Shih MD ,&nbsp;Pallavi S. Utukuri MD ,&nbsp;Amna A. Ajam MD, MBBS ,&nbsp;Moises Auron MD ,&nbsp;Susan M. Chang MD ,&nbsp;Justin T. Jordan MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Aleks Kalnins MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Phillip H. Kuo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Luke N. Ledbetter MD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. Pannell MD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey M. Pollock MD ,&nbsp;Jason Sheehan MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Bruno P. Soares MD ,&nbsp;Karl A. Soderlund MD ,&nbsp;Lily L. Wang MBBS, MPH ,&nbsp;Judah Burns MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.02.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Brain tumors represent a complex and clinically diverse disease group, whose management is particularly dependent on neuroimaging given the wide range of differential diagnostic considerations and clinical scenarios. The introduction of advanced brain imaging tools into clinical practice makes it paramount for all treating physicians to recognize the range and understand the appropriate application of various conventional and advanced imaging modalities. The imaging recommendations for neuro-oncologic clinical scenarios involving screening in patients with increased genetic risk, screening in patients with systemic malignancy, pretreatment evaluation in patients with intra- and extraaxial brain tumors, posttreatment-surveillance in patients with known brain tumors after completion of therapy, and subsequent workup in the context of suspected radiographic progression are encompassed by this document.</div><div>The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","volume":"22 5","pages":"Pages S108-S135"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144025001425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brain tumors represent a complex and clinically diverse disease group, whose management is particularly dependent on neuroimaging given the wide range of differential diagnostic considerations and clinical scenarios. The introduction of advanced brain imaging tools into clinical practice makes it paramount for all treating physicians to recognize the range and understand the appropriate application of various conventional and advanced imaging modalities. The imaging recommendations for neuro-oncologic clinical scenarios involving screening in patients with increased genetic risk, screening in patients with systemic malignancy, pretreatment evaluation in patients with intra- and extraaxial brain tumors, posttreatment-surveillance in patients with known brain tumors after completion of therapy, and subsequent workup in the context of suspected radiographic progression are encompassed by this document.
The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
ACR适当性标准®脑肿瘤
脑肿瘤是一种复杂且临床多样的疾病,鉴于广泛的鉴别诊断考虑和临床情况,其治疗尤其依赖于神经影像学。将先进的脑成像工具引入临床实践,使所有治疗医生认识到各种常规和先进成像方式的范围并了解其适当应用变得至关重要。本文件涵盖了神经肿瘤学临床场景的影像学建议,包括遗传风险增加患者的筛查、系统性恶性肿瘤患者的筛查、轴内和轴外脑肿瘤患者的预处理评估、治疗完成后已知脑肿瘤患者的治疗后监测以及疑似影像学进展背景下的后续随访。美国放射学会适当性标准是针对特定临床条件的循证指南,每年由多学科专家小组审查。指南的制定和修订过程支持对同行评议期刊的医学文献进行系统分析。已建立的方法原则,如建议分级评估,发展和评估或GRADE适用于评估证据。兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校适当方法用户手册提供了确定特定临床情况下成像和治疗程序的适当性的方法。在同行评议文献缺乏或模棱两可的情况下,专家可能是制定建议的主要证据来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Journal of the American College of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.90%
发文量
312
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American College of Radiology, JACR informs its readers of timely, pertinent, and important topics affecting the practice of diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, medical physicists, and radiation oncologists. In so doing, JACR improves their practices and helps optimize their role in the health care system. By providing a forum for informative, well-written articles on health policy, clinical practice, practice management, data science, and education, JACR engages readers in a dialogue that ultimately benefits patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信