ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Lung Cancer-Surveillance After Therapy

IF 4 3区医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING

Journal of the American College of Radiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2025.02.025

Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging, Rachna Madan MBBS , Raquelle H. El Alam MD , Christopher M. Walker MD , Tami J. Bang MD , Twyla B. Bartel DO, MBA , Kiran Batra MD , Anupama G. Brixey MD , Jared D. Christensen MD, MBA , Christian W. Cox MD , Anne V. Gonzalez MD, MSc , Brent P. Little MD , Natalie S. Lui MD , Hannah Maxfield MD , William H. Moore MD , Angel Qin MD , Girish S. Shroff MD , Kazuhiro Yasufuku MD, PhD , Jonathan H. Chung MD

{"title":"ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Lung Cancer-Surveillance After Therapy","authors":"Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging, Rachna Madan MBBS , Raquelle H. El Alam MD , Christopher M. Walker MD , Tami J. Bang MD , Twyla B. Bartel DO, MBA , Kiran Batra MD , Anupama G. Brixey MD , Jared D. Christensen MD, MBA , Christian W. Cox MD , Anne V. Gonzalez MD, MSc , Brent P. Little MD , Natalie S. Lui MD , Hannah Maxfield MD , William H. Moore MD , Angel Qin MD , Girish S. Shroff MD , Kazuhiro Yasufuku MD, PhD , Jonathan H. Chung MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.02.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This document reviews the evidence supporting different imaging modalities and techniques used to evaluate patients with a history of lung cancer. It focuses on the imaging evaluation of patients treated for stage I-III non–small-cell lung cancer and small-cell lung cancer, whether using individual modalities or combinations. Guidelines for both routine surveillance of stage I-III lung cancer and for the evaluation of suspected recurrence or disease progression are provided.</div><div>The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","volume":"22 5","pages":"Pages S319-S342"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144025001310","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This document reviews the evidence supporting different imaging modalities and techniques used to evaluate patients with a history of lung cancer. It focuses on the imaging evaluation of patients treated for stage I-III non–small-cell lung cancer and small-cell lung cancer, whether using individual modalities or combinations. Guidelines for both routine surveillance of stage I-III lung cancer and for the evaluation of suspected recurrence or disease progression are provided.

The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

ACR适宜性标准®肺癌治疗后监测

本文回顾了用于评估肺癌病史的不同影像学方式和技术的证据。它侧重于I-III期非小细胞肺癌和小细胞肺癌患者的影像学评估，无论是使用单独的方式还是联合的方式。提供了I-III期肺癌的常规监测和疑似复发或疾病进展的评估指南。美国放射学会适当性标准是针对特定临床条件的循证指南，每年由多学科专家小组审查。指南的制定和修订过程支持对同行评议期刊的医学文献进行系统分析。已建立的方法原则，如建议分级评估，发展和评估或GRADE适用于评估证据。兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校适当方法用户手册提供了确定特定临床情况下成像和治疗程序的适当性的方法。在同行评议文献缺乏或模棱两可的情况下，专家可能是制定建议的主要证据来源。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of the American College of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-

CiteScore

6.30

自引率

8.90%

发文量

312

审稿时长

34 days

期刊介绍： The official journal of the American College of Radiology, JACR informs its readers of timely, pertinent, and important topics affecting the practice of diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, medical physicists, and radiation oncologists. In so doing, JACR improves their practices and helps optimize their role in the health care system. By providing a forum for informative, well-written articles on health policy, clinical practice, practice management, data science, and education, JACR engages readers in a dialogue that ultimately benefits patient care.