Improving the diagnostic accuracy of small renal masses: Integration of radiomics and clear cell likelihood scores in multiparametric MRI

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ismet Mirac Cakir , Uluhan Eryuruk , Enes Gurun , Tumay Bekci , Gokhan Tonkaz , Eser Bulut , Ali Kupeli , Serdar Aslan
{"title":"Improving the diagnostic accuracy of small renal masses: Integration of radiomics and clear cell likelihood scores in multiparametric MRI","authors":"Ismet Mirac Cakir ,&nbsp;Uluhan Eryuruk ,&nbsp;Enes Gurun ,&nbsp;Tumay Bekci ,&nbsp;Gokhan Tonkaz ,&nbsp;Eser Bulut ,&nbsp;Ali Kupeli ,&nbsp;Serdar Aslan","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Accurate diagnosis of small renal masses is crucial for treatment planning. Combining radiomics analysis with the Clear Cell Likelihood Score (ccLS) in multiparametric MRI can effectively assess malignancy risk. This study aimed to evaluate the contribution of MRI-based radiomics analysis to the diagnostic performance of the ccLS in differentiating clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included patients with cT1a renal masses who underwent preoperative MRI and nephrectomy. Radiomic features were extracted from multiparametric MRI images, including T2-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging sequences. Qualitative assessment was performed using the ccLS version 2.0, based on multiparametric MRI findings. The diagnostic efficacies of the ccLS, radiomic analysis, and the combination of the two methods in differentiating ccRCCs were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 72 small renal masses (43 ccRCC and 29 non-ccRCC) from 68 patients were evaluated. Using ccLS alone, lesions classified as ccLS ≥ 4 were identified as ccRCCs with a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 73.3%. Radiomic analysis revealed significant differences between ccRCC and non-ccRCC lesions, with AUC values ranging from 0.48 to 0.87 across different features. The combined use of radiomic features and ccLS improved the differentiation of ccRCCs, achieving a sensitivity of 90.7%, specificity of 78.4%, and an AUC of 0.88. In lesions classified as ccLS 3 (equivocal), radiomic analysis alone distinguished ccRCCs with 100% sensitivity and 62.5% specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study’s findings demonstrated that radiomics analysis successfully differentiated lesions with a ccLS 3 and that the use of radiomic analysis in combination with ccLS successfully differentiated ccRCC and non-ccRCC lesions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 112174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25002608","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Accurate diagnosis of small renal masses is crucial for treatment planning. Combining radiomics analysis with the Clear Cell Likelihood Score (ccLS) in multiparametric MRI can effectively assess malignancy risk. This study aimed to evaluate the contribution of MRI-based radiomics analysis to the diagnostic performance of the ccLS in differentiating clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC).

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included patients with cT1a renal masses who underwent preoperative MRI and nephrectomy. Radiomic features were extracted from multiparametric MRI images, including T2-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging sequences. Qualitative assessment was performed using the ccLS version 2.0, based on multiparametric MRI findings. The diagnostic efficacies of the ccLS, radiomic analysis, and the combination of the two methods in differentiating ccRCCs were analyzed.

Results

A total of 72 small renal masses (43 ccRCC and 29 non-ccRCC) from 68 patients were evaluated. Using ccLS alone, lesions classified as ccLS ≥ 4 were identified as ccRCCs with a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 73.3%. Radiomic analysis revealed significant differences between ccRCC and non-ccRCC lesions, with AUC values ranging from 0.48 to 0.87 across different features. The combined use of radiomic features and ccLS improved the differentiation of ccRCCs, achieving a sensitivity of 90.7%, specificity of 78.4%, and an AUC of 0.88. In lesions classified as ccLS 3 (equivocal), radiomic analysis alone distinguished ccRCCs with 100% sensitivity and 62.5% specificity.

Conclusions

This study’s findings demonstrated that radiomics analysis successfully differentiated lesions with a ccLS 3 and that the use of radiomic analysis in combination with ccLS successfully differentiated ccRCC and non-ccRCC lesions.
提高肾小肿块的诊断准确性:多参数MRI放射组学和透明细胞可能性评分的整合
目的肾小肿块的准确诊断是制定治疗方案的关键。多参数MRI放射组学分析与透明细胞可能性评分(Clear Cell Likelihood Score, ccLS)相结合可有效评估肿瘤的恶性风险。本研究旨在评估基于mri的放射组学分析对鉴别透明细胞肾癌(ccRCC)的ccLS诊断性能的贡献。材料和方法本回顾性研究包括术前行MRI和肾切除术的cT1a肾肿块患者。从多参数MRI图像中提取放射学特征,包括t2加权成像和对比度增强的t1加权成像序列。基于多参数MRI结果,使用ccLS 2.0版本进行定性评估。分析了ccrcs的诊断效果、放射组学分析及两种方法联合鉴别ccrcs的效果。结果68例患者共72例肾小肿块(ccRCC 43例,非ccRCC 29例)。单独使用ccLS, ccLS≥4级的病变被识别为ccrcc,敏感性为83.3%,特异性为73.3%。放射组学分析显示ccRCC和非ccRCC病变之间存在显著差异,不同特征的AUC值在0.48至0.87之间。放射学特征和ccLS的联合应用改善了ccrcc的分化,敏感性为90.7%,特异性为78.4%,AUC为0.88。在分类为ccLS 3(模棱两可)的病变中,放射组学分析单独区分ccrcc的灵敏度为100%,特异性为62.5%。本研究结果表明放射组学分析可以成功地与ccls3区分病变,并且放射组学分析结合ccLS可以成功地区分ccRCC和非ccRCC病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信