Strengthening healthcare readiness: Lessons from frontline nurses in a South African tertiary hospital for future pandemic preparedness

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Sue Anne Bell , Jennifer B. Inloes , Petra Brysiewicz
{"title":"Strengthening healthcare readiness: Lessons from frontline nurses in a South African tertiary hospital for future pandemic preparedness","authors":"Sue Anne Bell ,&nbsp;Jennifer B. Inloes ,&nbsp;Petra Brysiewicz","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The World Health Organization and the International Council of Nurses both support nurses’ involvement in health policymaking, including readiness planning for public health emergencies. South Africa’s frontline nurses often have limited involvement in healthcare policymaking, even though nurses comprise 56% of the country’s total public healthcare workforce and 87% of its skilled health professionals. This has implications for the quality and safety of nursing care provided during past and anticipated future pandemic events.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This purpose of this study was to evaluate frontline healthcare professionals’ perspectives on pandemic preparedness in South Africa to inform policy improvements.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four focus groups with registered nurses (n = 11) and semi-structured interviews with disaster committee members (n = 4) were conducted. A review of existing disaster policies contextualized the findings, which were analyzed using qualitative content analysis guided by a health policy framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four key categories emerged that described barriers to working in a disaster context: working outside of role and scope, insufficient staffing, mental health impacts, and lack of training for disasters and pandemics, all of which contribute to challenges in pandemic preparedness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite being the majority of the health workforce, South African nurses often lack influence in disaster planning. This study highlights how systemic challenges in a resource-limited hospital setting—such as chronic staffing shortages, insufficient inclusion of nurses in disaster policy development, and lack of tailored mental health support—compromised pandemic preparedness. Interventions such as peer-led mental health support, bedside microteaching, and nurse-informed policies could strengthen future pandemic readiness. These findings offer practical, scalable solutions for similar low-resource settings and underscore the importance of involving frontline nurses in disaster policymaking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 101620"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X25000503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The World Health Organization and the International Council of Nurses both support nurses’ involvement in health policymaking, including readiness planning for public health emergencies. South Africa’s frontline nurses often have limited involvement in healthcare policymaking, even though nurses comprise 56% of the country’s total public healthcare workforce and 87% of its skilled health professionals. This has implications for the quality and safety of nursing care provided during past and anticipated future pandemic events.

Objective

This purpose of this study was to evaluate frontline healthcare professionals’ perspectives on pandemic preparedness in South Africa to inform policy improvements.

Methods

Four focus groups with registered nurses (n = 11) and semi-structured interviews with disaster committee members (n = 4) were conducted. A review of existing disaster policies contextualized the findings, which were analyzed using qualitative content analysis guided by a health policy framework.

Results

Four key categories emerged that described barriers to working in a disaster context: working outside of role and scope, insufficient staffing, mental health impacts, and lack of training for disasters and pandemics, all of which contribute to challenges in pandemic preparedness.

Conclusions

Despite being the majority of the health workforce, South African nurses often lack influence in disaster planning. This study highlights how systemic challenges in a resource-limited hospital setting—such as chronic staffing shortages, insufficient inclusion of nurses in disaster policy development, and lack of tailored mental health support—compromised pandemic preparedness. Interventions such as peer-led mental health support, bedside microteaching, and nurse-informed policies could strengthen future pandemic readiness. These findings offer practical, scalable solutions for similar low-resource settings and underscore the importance of involving frontline nurses in disaster policymaking.
加强卫生保健准备:南非一家三级医院一线护士对未来大流行防范的经验教训
背景世界卫生组织和国际护士理事会都支持护士参与卫生政策制定,包括突发公共卫生事件的准备规划。南非的一线护士通常对医疗保健政策制定的参与有限,尽管护士占该国公共医疗保健劳动力总数的56%,占熟练卫生专业人员的87%。这对过去和预计未来大流行事件期间提供的护理的质量和安全有影响。目的本研究的目的是评估一线卫生保健专业人员对南非大流行防范的看法,以便为政策改进提供信息。方法采用4个焦点小组(11名注册护士)和半结构化访谈(4名灾难委员会成员)。对现有灾害政策的审查使调查结果具有背景,并在卫生政策框架的指导下使用定性内容分析对其进行了分析。结果出现了四个主要类别,描述了在灾害背景下工作的障碍:超出角色和范围的工作、人员配备不足、心理健康影响以及缺乏灾害和流行病培训,所有这些都导致了大流行病防范方面的挑战。结论:尽管南非护士占卫生人力的大多数,但在灾难规划方面往往缺乏影响力。这项研究强调了资源有限的医院环境中的系统性挑战,如长期人员短缺、护士在灾害政策制定中的纳入不足以及缺乏量身定制的精神卫生支持,如何损害了大流行的准备工作。同伴主导的心理卫生支持、床边微型教学和护士知情政策等干预措施可以加强未来大流行的准备工作。这些发现为类似的低资源环境提供了实用的、可扩展的解决方案,并强调了让一线护士参与灾害决策的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care. The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信