Sue Anne Bell , Jennifer B. Inloes , Petra Brysiewicz
{"title":"Strengthening healthcare readiness: Lessons from frontline nurses in a South African tertiary hospital for future pandemic preparedness","authors":"Sue Anne Bell , Jennifer B. Inloes , Petra Brysiewicz","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The World Health Organization and the International Council of Nurses both support nurses’ involvement in health policymaking, including readiness planning for public health emergencies. South Africa’s frontline nurses often have limited involvement in healthcare policymaking, even though nurses comprise 56% of the country’s total public healthcare workforce and 87% of its skilled health professionals. This has implications for the quality and safety of nursing care provided during past and anticipated future pandemic events.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This purpose of this study was to evaluate frontline healthcare professionals’ perspectives on pandemic preparedness in South Africa to inform policy improvements.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four focus groups with registered nurses (n = 11) and semi-structured interviews with disaster committee members (n = 4) were conducted. A review of existing disaster policies contextualized the findings, which were analyzed using qualitative content analysis guided by a health policy framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four key categories emerged that described barriers to working in a disaster context: working outside of role and scope, insufficient staffing, mental health impacts, and lack of training for disasters and pandemics, all of which contribute to challenges in pandemic preparedness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite being the majority of the health workforce, South African nurses often lack influence in disaster planning. This study highlights how systemic challenges in a resource-limited hospital setting—such as chronic staffing shortages, insufficient inclusion of nurses in disaster policy development, and lack of tailored mental health support—compromised pandemic preparedness. Interventions such as peer-led mental health support, bedside microteaching, and nurse-informed policies could strengthen future pandemic readiness. These findings offer practical, scalable solutions for similar low-resource settings and underscore the importance of involving frontline nurses in disaster policymaking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 101620"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X25000503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The World Health Organization and the International Council of Nurses both support nurses’ involvement in health policymaking, including readiness planning for public health emergencies. South Africa’s frontline nurses often have limited involvement in healthcare policymaking, even though nurses comprise 56% of the country’s total public healthcare workforce and 87% of its skilled health professionals. This has implications for the quality and safety of nursing care provided during past and anticipated future pandemic events.
Objective
This purpose of this study was to evaluate frontline healthcare professionals’ perspectives on pandemic preparedness in South Africa to inform policy improvements.
Methods
Four focus groups with registered nurses (n = 11) and semi-structured interviews with disaster committee members (n = 4) were conducted. A review of existing disaster policies contextualized the findings, which were analyzed using qualitative content analysis guided by a health policy framework.
Results
Four key categories emerged that described barriers to working in a disaster context: working outside of role and scope, insufficient staffing, mental health impacts, and lack of training for disasters and pandemics, all of which contribute to challenges in pandemic preparedness.
Conclusions
Despite being the majority of the health workforce, South African nurses often lack influence in disaster planning. This study highlights how systemic challenges in a resource-limited hospital setting—such as chronic staffing shortages, insufficient inclusion of nurses in disaster policy development, and lack of tailored mental health support—compromised pandemic preparedness. Interventions such as peer-led mental health support, bedside microteaching, and nurse-informed policies could strengthen future pandemic readiness. These findings offer practical, scalable solutions for similar low-resource settings and underscore the importance of involving frontline nurses in disaster policymaking.
期刊介绍:
International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care.
The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.