{"title":"Aromatherapy for the Management of Menopause Symptoms: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Leila Karimi, Mona Larki, Solmaz Mohammadi, Masoumeh Safyari, Somayeh Makvandi","doi":"10.34172/jcs.025.33474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Numerous studies have found aromatherapy beneficial during menopause; however, some of its effects are still unclear in past meta-analyses, and no comprehensive study has consolidated and analyzed grading evidence of its impact on menopausal symptoms. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to determine and update the impact of aromatherapy on the management of menopausal symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library until January 20, 2024, without any limitations on language, time, or region to find randomized clinical trials. To evaluate the included trials' methodology, we used version 2 of the Cochrane Handbook's risk-of-bias assessment, as well as GRADEpro GDT (Guideline Development Tool) for quality evidence and Review Manager software (RevMan version 5.1) for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with mixed quality from 15 trials with 1217 participants. Compared to the control group, aromatherapy reduced physical (SMD -0.93, 95% CI -1.19 to -0.67, <i>P</i><0.00001), psychological (SMD -0.83, 95% CI -1.13 to -0.54, <i>P</i><0.00001), and overall symptoms (SMD -1.51, 95% CI -2.11 to -0.90, <i>P</i><0.00001), enhanced sexual function (MD 5.58, 95% CI 0.98 to 10.17, <i>P</i>=0.02), and the quality of sleep (MD -4.51, 95% CI -7.45 to -1.57, <i>P</i>=0.003). The evidence grading for physical symptoms was moderate, and other variables were low to very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aromatherapy is efficacious for managing the symptoms of menopause. However, there is insufficient high-quality evidence for some outcomes, indicating the necessity for additional research.</p>","PeriodicalId":516530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of caring sciences","volume":"14 1","pages":"58-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of caring sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.025.33474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Numerous studies have found aromatherapy beneficial during menopause; however, some of its effects are still unclear in past meta-analyses, and no comprehensive study has consolidated and analyzed grading evidence of its impact on menopausal symptoms. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to determine and update the impact of aromatherapy on the management of menopausal symptoms.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library until January 20, 2024, without any limitations on language, time, or region to find randomized clinical trials. To evaluate the included trials' methodology, we used version 2 of the Cochrane Handbook's risk-of-bias assessment, as well as GRADEpro GDT (Guideline Development Tool) for quality evidence and Review Manager software (RevMan version 5.1) for analysis.
Results: We conducted a meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with mixed quality from 15 trials with 1217 participants. Compared to the control group, aromatherapy reduced physical (SMD -0.93, 95% CI -1.19 to -0.67, P<0.00001), psychological (SMD -0.83, 95% CI -1.13 to -0.54, P<0.00001), and overall symptoms (SMD -1.51, 95% CI -2.11 to -0.90, P<0.00001), enhanced sexual function (MD 5.58, 95% CI 0.98 to 10.17, P=0.02), and the quality of sleep (MD -4.51, 95% CI -7.45 to -1.57, P=0.003). The evidence grading for physical symptoms was moderate, and other variables were low to very low.
Conclusion: Aromatherapy is efficacious for managing the symptoms of menopause. However, there is insufficient high-quality evidence for some outcomes, indicating the necessity for additional research.
大量研究发现芳香疗法对更年期有益;然而,在过去的荟萃分析中,它的一些效果仍然不清楚,并且没有综合研究巩固和分析其对更年期症状影响的分级证据。因此,本荟萃分析旨在确定和更新芳香疗法对绝经期症状管理的影响。方法:截至2024年1月20日,我们使用PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和Cochrane Library进行了全面的文献检索,不受语言、时间和地区的限制,寻找随机临床试验。为了评估纳入试验的方法,我们使用Cochrane手册第2版的偏倚风险评估,以及GRADEpro GDT(指南开发工具)作为质量证据,并使用Review Manager软件(RevMan version 5.1)进行分析。结果:我们对13项随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了荟萃分析,这些试验来自15项试验,共有1217名参与者。与对照组相比,芳香疗法降低了身体素质(SMD -0.93, 95% CI -1.19至-0.67,PPPP=0.02)和睡眠质量(MD -4.51, 95% CI -7.45至-1.57,P=0.003)。身体症状的证据分级为中等,其他变量从低到极低。结论:芳香疗法对更年期症状有较好的治疗效果。然而,一些结果缺乏高质量的证据,表明有必要进行进一步的研究。