Developing and Evaluating a Home Hemodialysis Training Program-A Quality Improvement Study.

Kristina K Knudsen, Carolina V Adrian, Mathilde H Jensen, Siw Ilsøe, Jeanett Rugaard, Selina Emilie Poulsen, Krista Dybtved Kjærgaard, Jeanette Finderup
{"title":"Developing and Evaluating a Home Hemodialysis Training Program-A Quality Improvement Study.","authors":"Kristina K Knudsen, Carolina V Adrian, Mathilde H Jensen, Siw Ilsøe, Jeanett Rugaard, Selina Emilie Poulsen, Krista Dybtved Kjærgaard, Jeanette Finderup","doi":"10.1111/hdi.13252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2018, our home hemodialysis training program required 3-4 months to complete, with sessions lasting 4 h, three times a week. Due to the time commitment, some patients who preferred home hemodialysis decided on alternative dialysis modalities. This study aimed to (1) identify potential improvements to Training Program 1.0, (2) develop Training Program 2.0, and (3) assess the outcomes of Training Program 2.0.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We reviewed literature, conducted focus groups with home hemodialysis nurses in Helsinki, Finland, and interviewed patients who participated in Training Program 1.0. Training Program 2.0 was developed in collaboration with patients and clinicians, using a \"learning by doing\" approach. Evaluation included both qualitative interviews and quantitative analysis of patient records.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Patients' feedback, aligned with the literature and Helsinki's program, led to six major changes: (1) more frequent training sessions, (2) earlier introduction of self-cannulation, (3) a permanent team of training nurses, (4) a shorter and more structured program, (5) individualized weekly schedules, and (6) clearer instructions. Training frequency increased to four sessions per week, with self-cannulation introduced in the second week. The quantitative results showed a trend toward a reduction in the number of training sessions and total training time. The qualitative data indicated a marked improvement in patient experience.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The modifications in Training Program 2.0 created a more effective learning environment, as evidenced by improved patient satisfaction. While quantitative measures did not show significant reductions in training time, the qualitative improvements suggest that these changes positively impact the patient experience, aligning with findings from other home hemodialysis studies. These results underscore the importance of tailoring training programs to patient needs and preferences, contributing to better engagement and potentially higher adoption of home hemodialysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94027,"journal":{"name":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.13252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In 2018, our home hemodialysis training program required 3-4 months to complete, with sessions lasting 4 h, three times a week. Due to the time commitment, some patients who preferred home hemodialysis decided on alternative dialysis modalities. This study aimed to (1) identify potential improvements to Training Program 1.0, (2) develop Training Program 2.0, and (3) assess the outcomes of Training Program 2.0.

Method: We reviewed literature, conducted focus groups with home hemodialysis nurses in Helsinki, Finland, and interviewed patients who participated in Training Program 1.0. Training Program 2.0 was developed in collaboration with patients and clinicians, using a "learning by doing" approach. Evaluation included both qualitative interviews and quantitative analysis of patient records.

Findings: Patients' feedback, aligned with the literature and Helsinki's program, led to six major changes: (1) more frequent training sessions, (2) earlier introduction of self-cannulation, (3) a permanent team of training nurses, (4) a shorter and more structured program, (5) individualized weekly schedules, and (6) clearer instructions. Training frequency increased to four sessions per week, with self-cannulation introduced in the second week. The quantitative results showed a trend toward a reduction in the number of training sessions and total training time. The qualitative data indicated a marked improvement in patient experience.

Discussion: The modifications in Training Program 2.0 created a more effective learning environment, as evidenced by improved patient satisfaction. While quantitative measures did not show significant reductions in training time, the qualitative improvements suggest that these changes positively impact the patient experience, aligning with findings from other home hemodialysis studies. These results underscore the importance of tailoring training programs to patient needs and preferences, contributing to better engagement and potentially higher adoption of home hemodialysis.

发展和评估家庭血液透析培训计划-质量改进研究。
简介:2018年,我们的家庭血液透析培训项目需要3-4个月才能完成,每次4小时,每周3次。由于时间的限制,一些倾向于家庭血液透析的患者决定采用其他透析方式。本研究旨在(1)确定培训计划1.0的潜在改进,(2)制定培训计划2.0,以及(3)评估培训计划2.0的结果。方法:回顾文献,对芬兰赫尔辛基的家庭血液透析护士进行焦点小组调查,并对参加培训计划1.0的患者进行访谈。培训计划2.0是与患者和临床医生合作开发的,采用“边做边学”的方法。评估包括定性访谈和定量分析患者记录。研究结果:患者的反馈与文献和赫尔辛基的计划一致,导致了六个主要变化:(1)更频繁的培训课程,(2)更早地引入自我插管,(3)永久性的培训护士团队,(4)更短且更结构化的计划,(5)个性化的每周时间表,以及(6)更清晰的指导。训练频率增加到每周四次,并在第二周引入自我插管。定量结果显示训练次数和总训练时间有减少的趋势。定性数据表明患者体验有显著改善。讨论:培训计划2.0的修改创造了更有效的学习环境,患者满意度的提高证明了这一点。虽然定量测量没有显示培训时间的显著减少,但定性改进表明这些变化对患者体验有积极影响,这与其他家庭血液透析研究的结果一致。这些结果强调了根据患者需求和偏好定制培训计划的重要性,有助于提高家庭血液透析的参与度和潜在的更高采用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信