Editorial Commentary: Open Distal Tibial Allograft With Screw Fixation for Distal Tibial Allograft Glenoid Reconstruction in Patients With Shoulder Instability May Result in Lower Recurrence Rates Than Button Fixation.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Phob Ganokroj, Nate Dickinson, Matthew T Provencher
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Open Distal Tibial Allograft With Screw Fixation for Distal Tibial Allograft Glenoid Reconstruction in Patients With Shoulder Instability May Result in Lower Recurrence Rates Than Button Fixation.","authors":"Phob Ganokroj, Nate Dickinson, Matthew T Provencher","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The glenoid rim is altered in up to 90% of shoulders with recurrent instability. Distal tibial allograft, an option for anatomic glenoid reconstruction (AGR), has excellent midterm outcomes and low recurrence and resorption rates using open or arthroscopic technique. Optimal graft position in both the medial-lateral and vertical axes, adequate fixation, and restoration of soft-tissue balance is the key to successful outcomes. Regarding fixation methods, metal screw fixation is a standard for AGR with free bone block or Latarjet procedure. The main disadvantage of screw fixation is hardware prominence and irritation to surrounding bone and soft tissue (6.5%), the leading cause of revision surgery. Button fixation may mitigate hardware complications but lead to greater graft malposition, resorption, and recurrence rates. The authors used an open approach with screw fixation for AGR with distal tibial allograft and restoration of the capsulolabral complex to reduce recurrent instability after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The glenoid rim is altered in up to 90% of shoulders with recurrent instability. Distal tibial allograft, an option for anatomic glenoid reconstruction (AGR), has excellent midterm outcomes and low recurrence and resorption rates using open or arthroscopic technique. Optimal graft position in both the medial-lateral and vertical axes, adequate fixation, and restoration of soft-tissue balance is the key to successful outcomes. Regarding fixation methods, metal screw fixation is a standard for AGR with free bone block or Latarjet procedure. The main disadvantage of screw fixation is hardware prominence and irritation to surrounding bone and soft tissue (6.5%), the leading cause of revision surgery. Button fixation may mitigate hardware complications but lead to greater graft malposition, resorption, and recurrence rates. The authors used an open approach with screw fixation for AGR with distal tibial allograft and restoration of the capsulolabral complex to reduce recurrent instability after surgery.

编辑评论:对于肩关节不稳的患者,开放胫骨远端同种异体移植物螺钉固定用于胫骨远端同种异体移植物肩关节重建的复发率比螺钉固定低。
高达90%的肩关节盂缘发生改变,伴有复发性不稳定。胫骨远端同种异体移植物(DTA)是解剖性关节盂重建术(AGR)的一种选择,使用开放或关节镜技术具有良好的中期预后和低复发率和吸收率。在中、外侧和垂直轴的最佳移植物位置,适当的固定和软组织平衡的恢复是成功结果的关键。关于固定方法,金属螺钉固定是游离骨块或Latarjet手术治疗AGR的标准方法。螺钉固定的主要缺点是硬体突出和对周围骨和软组织的刺激(6.5%),这是翻修手术的主要原因。钮扣固定可减轻硬件并发症,但导致更大的移植物错位,再吸收和复发率。作者采用开放入路螺钉固定AGR和DTA,并修复肩胛囊复合体,以减少术后复发性不稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信