Should Joint Deformity, which is More Common Than Swelling or Tenderness, be Assessed in all Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients and Databases?

IF 2.9 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Theodore Pincus, Tengfei Li, Kathryn A Gibson
{"title":"Should Joint Deformity, which is More Common Than Swelling or Tenderness, be Assessed in all Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients and Databases?","authors":"Theodore Pincus, Tengfei Li, Kathryn A Gibson","doi":"10.1002/acr2.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We analyzed 28 joint counts in 173 contemporary routine care patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who had disease duration of 10 years and were examined in 2021, for swollen joint count (SJC), tender joint count (TJC)/pain on motion, and deformity joint count (DJC)/limited motion. In addition, we computed DJC according to Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DA28), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) as remission/low or moderate/high activity or severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This report presents a retrospective analyses of a cross-sectional Australian database for medians and prevalences of SJC, TJC, and DJC, including in RA index categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median values were 0 for SJC, 2.0 for TJC, and 4.0 for DJC, respectively, including SJC of 0,1 in 123 patients (71%), TJC of 0,1 in 82 patients (47%), SJC+TJC of 0,1 in 73 patients (42%), and DJC of 0,1 in 65 patients (38%). Among 4,498 joints, 1,330 with any abnormality included 286 swollen joints (6%), 590 tender joints (13%), 879 deformed joints (20%), 37 only swollen joints (1%), 289 only tender joints (6%), 659 only deformed joints (15%), 458 joints with two abnormalities (10%), and 80 joints with three abnormalities (2%). The 73 of all 173 with patients with SJC and TJC 0,1 (42%), included 56% to 67% who were classified in remission or low DAS28 ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CDAI, or RAPID3 activity or severity, of whom 47% to 58% had DJC ≥2, whereas 11% to 36% were classified as moderate or high RA index activity or severity, of whom 57% to 58% had DJC ≥2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SJC+TJC of 0,1 was more common than a DJC of 0,1 in contemporary patients with RA. DJC was ≥2 in the majority of patients who met SJC+TJC remission criteria for RA indices, as in patients who were classified as moderate/high although they met SJC+TJC remission criteria. DJC should be included in long-term routine care and RA databases.</p>","PeriodicalId":93845,"journal":{"name":"ACR open rheumatology","volume":"7 5","pages":"e70025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12089699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR open rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.70025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We analyzed 28 joint counts in 173 contemporary routine care patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who had disease duration of 10 years and were examined in 2021, for swollen joint count (SJC), tender joint count (TJC)/pain on motion, and deformity joint count (DJC)/limited motion. In addition, we computed DJC according to Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DA28), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) as remission/low or moderate/high activity or severity.

Methods: This report presents a retrospective analyses of a cross-sectional Australian database for medians and prevalences of SJC, TJC, and DJC, including in RA index categories.

Results: Median values were 0 for SJC, 2.0 for TJC, and 4.0 for DJC, respectively, including SJC of 0,1 in 123 patients (71%), TJC of 0,1 in 82 patients (47%), SJC+TJC of 0,1 in 73 patients (42%), and DJC of 0,1 in 65 patients (38%). Among 4,498 joints, 1,330 with any abnormality included 286 swollen joints (6%), 590 tender joints (13%), 879 deformed joints (20%), 37 only swollen joints (1%), 289 only tender joints (6%), 659 only deformed joints (15%), 458 joints with two abnormalities (10%), and 80 joints with three abnormalities (2%). The 73 of all 173 with patients with SJC and TJC 0,1 (42%), included 56% to 67% who were classified in remission or low DAS28 ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CDAI, or RAPID3 activity or severity, of whom 47% to 58% had DJC ≥2, whereas 11% to 36% were classified as moderate or high RA index activity or severity, of whom 57% to 58% had DJC ≥2.

Conclusion: SJC+TJC of 0,1 was more common than a DJC of 0,1 in contemporary patients with RA. DJC was ≥2 in the majority of patients who met SJC+TJC remission criteria for RA indices, as in patients who were classified as moderate/high although they met SJC+TJC remission criteria. DJC should be included in long-term routine care and RA databases.

关节畸形比肿胀或压痛更常见,所有类风湿关节炎患者和数据库都应该评估关节畸形吗?
目的:我们分析了173例患有类风湿关节炎(RA)的当代常规护理患者的28个关节计数,这些患者病程为10年,并于2021年接受了检查,包括肿胀关节计数(SJC)、压痛关节计数(TJC)/运动疼痛和畸形关节计数(DJC)/运动受限。此外,我们根据28个关节的疾病活动评分(DA28)、临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)和患者指数数据3常规评估(RAPID3)计算DJC,分为缓解/低或中/高活动或严重程度。方法:本报告回顾性分析了澳大利亚横断面数据库中SJC、TJC和DJC的中位数和患病率,包括RA指数类别。结果:SJC的中位值为0,TJC的中位值为2.0,DJC的中位值为4.0,其中SJC 123例(71%)为0.1,TJC 82例(47%)为0.1,SJC+TJC 73例(42%)为0.1,DJC 65例(38%)为0.1。在4498个关节中,异常1330个,包括肿胀关节286个(6%)、压痛关节590个(13%)、变形关节879个(20%)、仅肿胀关节37个(1%)、仅压痛关节289个(6%)、仅变形关节659个(15%)、两种异常458个(10%)、三种异常80个(2%)。173例SJC和TJC患者中的73例(42%),包括56%至67%的缓解或低DAS28 ESR红细胞沉降率、CDAI或RAPID3活性或严重程度,其中47%至58%的患者DJC≥2,而11%至36%的患者被归类为中度或高RA指数活性或严重程度,其中57%至58%的患者DJC≥2。结论:当代RA患者SJC+TJC值为0,1较DJC值为0,1更为常见。在大多数符合SJC+TJC缓解标准的RA患者中,DJC≥2,而在符合SJC+TJC缓解标准的患者中,DJC为中/高。ddc应纳入长期常规护理和RA数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信