Quality Improvement Checklist for Nurses in Critical Care Units: Development and Validation.

Journal of caring sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.34172/jcs.025.33089
Ritika Rajput, Ashok Kumar Bishnoi, Nipin Kalal, Nikhil Kothari
{"title":"Quality Improvement Checklist for Nurses in Critical Care Units: Development and Validation.","authors":"Ritika Rajput, Ashok Kumar Bishnoi, Nipin Kalal, Nikhil Kothari","doi":"10.34172/jcs.025.33089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient in critical care units (CCUs) are admitted with multiple clinical problems and busy environment with critical situations makes nurses prone to commit mistakes. Thus, the quality checklist helps the staff in providing adequate, safe, and efficient client care. The objective of the present study was to develop quality improvement checklist for nurses working in CCU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A methodological study was carried out to develop quality improvement checklist for CCU in different phases. Validity was measured in terms of face, content, and construct validity. Modified Delphi technique used for content validity. Construct validity was analyzed by factor analysis. Reliability was investigated in terms of internal consistency of checklist and inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a total of 32 items in the final draft of the checklist. Cronbach's alpha which 0.78 was. Cohen's kappa was 0.88. Inter-item correlation was found between 0.2 and 0.7. The content validity index (CVI) was 0.98. All items were loaded in 8 factors and accounted for 60.7% of variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quality improvement checklist has good validity and reliability and it can be used to evaluate and improve the quality of CCU.</p>","PeriodicalId":516530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of caring sciences","volume":"14 1","pages":"25-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of caring sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.025.33089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient in critical care units (CCUs) are admitted with multiple clinical problems and busy environment with critical situations makes nurses prone to commit mistakes. Thus, the quality checklist helps the staff in providing adequate, safe, and efficient client care. The objective of the present study was to develop quality improvement checklist for nurses working in CCU.

Methods: A methodological study was carried out to develop quality improvement checklist for CCU in different phases. Validity was measured in terms of face, content, and construct validity. Modified Delphi technique used for content validity. Construct validity was analyzed by factor analysis. Reliability was investigated in terms of internal consistency of checklist and inter-rater reliability.

Results: There were a total of 32 items in the final draft of the checklist. Cronbach's alpha which 0.78 was. Cohen's kappa was 0.88. Inter-item correlation was found between 0.2 and 0.7. The content validity index (CVI) was 0.98. All items were loaded in 8 factors and accounted for 60.7% of variance.

Conclusion: Quality improvement checklist has good validity and reliability and it can be used to evaluate and improve the quality of CCU.

重症监护病房护士质量改进检查表:开发与验证。
重症监护病房(CCUs)患者入院时有多种临床问题,繁忙的环境和危急的情况使护士容易犯错误。因此,质量检查表有助于员工提供充分、安全和有效的客户服务。本研究的目的是为CCU护理人员编制质量改进清单。方法:采用方法学研究方法,编制CCU各阶段质量改进清单。效度是根据面效度、内容效度和结构效度来测量的。内容效度采用改进的德尔菲法。采用因子分析分析构念效度。信度主要从量表内部一致性和量表间信度两个方面进行研究。结果:终稿共有32个项目。Cronbach的alpha值为0.78。Cohen的kappa为0.88。项目间相关系数在0.2 ~ 0.7之间。内容效度指数(CVI)为0.98。所有条目均加载8个因子,占方差的60.7%。结论:质量改进检查表具有良好的效度和信度,可用于CCU质量的评价和改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信