Why Access Matters in Value-Based Healthcare: A Systematic Review.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Allen M Chen
{"title":"Why Access Matters in Value-Based Healthcare: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Allen M Chen","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Inroduction: </strong>To outline why access to care should be central to quality improvement efforts across health systems while identifying patient-centric strategies that could be used.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was designed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. A literature search of original peer-reviewed publications was undertaken to identify studies pertaining to the benefits of healthcare access in the setting of patient care. Articles published from January 2013 to January 2023 were included. An interpretive synthesis was then presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 61 peer-reviewed studies were identified and differed significantly in their clinical design, methods, and endpoints. The core themes could be broadly categorized into the following: health outcomes (N = 32), patient satisfaction or experience (N = 15), operational efficiency (N = 7), and cost containment (N = 7). Twelve publications focused at least in part on equity issues, structural racism, and/or implicit bias; and five publications addressed disparities in education and/or technical literacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Access to healthcare affects quality of care, impacts the patient experience, and influences health outcomes and is a fundamental stalwart of value-based medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"47 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000471","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inroduction: To outline why access to care should be central to quality improvement efforts across health systems while identifying patient-centric strategies that could be used.

Methods: This study was designed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement. A literature search of original peer-reviewed publications was undertaken to identify studies pertaining to the benefits of healthcare access in the setting of patient care. Articles published from January 2013 to January 2023 were included. An interpretive synthesis was then presented.

Results: A total of 61 peer-reviewed studies were identified and differed significantly in their clinical design, methods, and endpoints. The core themes could be broadly categorized into the following: health outcomes (N = 32), patient satisfaction or experience (N = 15), operational efficiency (N = 7), and cost containment (N = 7). Twelve publications focused at least in part on equity issues, structural racism, and/or implicit bias; and five publications addressed disparities in education and/or technical literacy.

Conclusions: Access to healthcare affects quality of care, impacts the patient experience, and influences health outcomes and is a fundamental stalwart of value-based medicine.

为什么访问在基于价值的医疗保健中很重要:一项系统综述。
简介:概述为什么获得医疗服务应该是整个卫生系统质量改进工作的核心,同时确定可以使用的以患者为中心的战略。方法:本研究根据系统评价首选报告项目和荟萃分析方案声明进行设计。对原始同行评议出版物进行文献检索,以确定与患者护理环境中获得医疗保健的益处有关的研究。文章发表于2013年1月至2023年1月。然后提出了解释性综合。结果:共鉴定了61项同行评议的研究,在临床设计、方法和终点方面存在显著差异。核心主题大致可分为以下几类:健康结果(N = 32)、患者满意度或体验(N = 15)、运营效率(N = 7)和成本控制(N = 7)。12份出版物至少部分关注公平问题、结构性种族主义和/或隐性偏见;还有五份出版物涉及教育和(或)技术素养方面的差异。结论:获得医疗保健会影响护理质量,影响患者体验,影响健康结果,是基于价值的医学的基本支柱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信