David Bull, Marina Pagaki-Skaliora, Ava Rietdy, Gabriella Mukahanana, Asmita Raja, Ishwar Malhi
{"title":"Improving Job Completion in Acute Medical Units Through Role-Specific Documentation: A Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"David Bull, Marina Pagaki-Skaliora, Ava Rietdy, Gabriella Mukahanana, Asmita Raja, Ishwar Malhi","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>High-quality documentation is vital for efficient patient care. This study aimed to enhance documentation clarity in the acute medical unit (AMU) at our local institution and to improve job completion rates and reduce missed jobs per patient per day (JPD). From January 26 to April 10, 2024, we collected data on 606 patients and 2,298 jobs. Four collaborators documented patient plans using either Standard Documentation or a novel Role-Specific Documentation. Standard Documentation used a single \"Plan\" heading, while Role-Specific Documentation used specific headings for \"Doctors,\" \"Nurses,\" and \"MDT\" (Multidisciplinary Team). Data were analyzed using Student t-test (p < .05). Standard Documentation group documented 1,291 jobs for 345 patients; Role-Specific Documentation group documented 1,007 jobs for 261 patients. Role-Specific Documentation had fewer missed jobs (147 vs. 294, p = .0002) and a higher percentage of completed jobs (85.74% vs. 77.99%, p = .0003). Although total job completion showed no significant difference, Role-Specific Documentation had more completed JPD (3.47 vs. 2.94, p = .0052). The Role-Specific Documentation system improved job completion and reduced missed JPD. Despite fewer patients, the new system proved more efficient, suggesting potential for wider adoption. Future studies should explore the documentation methods' impact on clinical outcomes and operational metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"47 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: High-quality documentation is vital for efficient patient care. This study aimed to enhance documentation clarity in the acute medical unit (AMU) at our local institution and to improve job completion rates and reduce missed jobs per patient per day (JPD). From January 26 to April 10, 2024, we collected data on 606 patients and 2,298 jobs. Four collaborators documented patient plans using either Standard Documentation or a novel Role-Specific Documentation. Standard Documentation used a single "Plan" heading, while Role-Specific Documentation used specific headings for "Doctors," "Nurses," and "MDT" (Multidisciplinary Team). Data were analyzed using Student t-test (p < .05). Standard Documentation group documented 1,291 jobs for 345 patients; Role-Specific Documentation group documented 1,007 jobs for 261 patients. Role-Specific Documentation had fewer missed jobs (147 vs. 294, p = .0002) and a higher percentage of completed jobs (85.74% vs. 77.99%, p = .0003). Although total job completion showed no significant difference, Role-Specific Documentation had more completed JPD (3.47 vs. 2.94, p = .0052). The Role-Specific Documentation system improved job completion and reduced missed JPD. Despite fewer patients, the new system proved more efficient, suggesting potential for wider adoption. Future studies should explore the documentation methods' impact on clinical outcomes and operational metrics.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®.
The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as:
Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform