Stefan Lautenbacher, Niklas Ceynowa, Makaras Burlakovas, Philip Lang, Miriam Kunz
{"title":"Observer Scales of Facial Pain Expression Can Significantly Predict Acute Postoperative Pain in the Recovery Room.","authors":"Stefan Lautenbacher, Niklas Ceynowa, Makaras Burlakovas, Philip Lang, Miriam Kunz","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Immediately after surgery and general anesthesia patients may experience periods of dizziness, disorientation and sedation, which can hinder valid pain reports. Observational pain assessment, especially focusing on the face, may add to the subjective pain report in the recovery room. With the present study we wanted to put this assumption to test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>63 patients wo had undergone a wide range of surgical procedures under general anesthesia were observed twice: 10 and 40 minutes after arrival in the recovery room. At these two time points, a trained examiner observed the patients' facial expression and filled out the face items of the Brief Pain Scale non intubated (BPS-NI) and of the Pain and Impaired Cognition15 (PAIC-15) scale. After that, a nurse asked the patients to rate their pain on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both time points, the observer scales significantly predicted NRS ratings, with the BPS-NI being slightly superior (moderate/strong effect sizes) compared to the PAIC-15 (small/moderate effect sizes). On a group level, observational pain assessment showed a decrease in pain across the two time points, whereas NRS ratings remained stable. Despite this disparity, individual changes in pain ratings between the two time points were also significantly predicted by changes in both observer scales (moderate effect sizes).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In the recovery room, observational pain assessment can serve as a valid predictor of subjective pain. Thus, in cases where the validity of the pain report may be hampered, especially the face item of the BPI-NI may give substituting information about acute post-operative pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Immediately after surgery and general anesthesia patients may experience periods of dizziness, disorientation and sedation, which can hinder valid pain reports. Observational pain assessment, especially focusing on the face, may add to the subjective pain report in the recovery room. With the present study we wanted to put this assumption to test.
Methods: 63 patients wo had undergone a wide range of surgical procedures under general anesthesia were observed twice: 10 and 40 minutes after arrival in the recovery room. At these two time points, a trained examiner observed the patients' facial expression and filled out the face items of the Brief Pain Scale non intubated (BPS-NI) and of the Pain and Impaired Cognition15 (PAIC-15) scale. After that, a nurse asked the patients to rate their pain on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).
Results: For both time points, the observer scales significantly predicted NRS ratings, with the BPS-NI being slightly superior (moderate/strong effect sizes) compared to the PAIC-15 (small/moderate effect sizes). On a group level, observational pain assessment showed a decrease in pain across the two time points, whereas NRS ratings remained stable. Despite this disparity, individual changes in pain ratings between the two time points were also significantly predicted by changes in both observer scales (moderate effect sizes).
Discussion: In the recovery room, observational pain assessment can serve as a valid predictor of subjective pain. Thus, in cases where the validity of the pain report may be hampered, especially the face item of the BPI-NI may give substituting information about acute post-operative pain.
期刊介绍:
The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.