Practical Guide to Clinical Trial Accessibility: Making Trial Participation a Standard of Care.

Q1 Medicine
Hedyeh Ebrahimi, Jodie Allen, Yelak Biru, Ravin Garg, Christine Hodgdon, William K Oh, David Steensma, Sumanta K Pal, Therese Mulvey
{"title":"Practical Guide to Clinical Trial Accessibility: Making Trial Participation a Standard of Care.","authors":"Hedyeh Ebrahimi, Jodie Allen, Yelak Biru, Ravin Garg, Christine Hodgdon, William K Oh, David Steensma, Sumanta K Pal, Therese Mulvey","doi":"10.1200/EDBK-25-100052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite being a cornerstone of cancer treatment advancement, clinical trials remain inaccessible for many patients because of structural, socioeconomic, and systemic barriers. In this multidisciplinary perspective piece, stakeholders from patient advocacy, community oncology, industry, and academic medicine offer a collaborative overview of key challenges and practical solutions to improve trial accessibility. Patient advocates highlight the need to address language barriers, financial toxicity, and underrepresentation through community engagement and patient-centered trial design. Community oncologists underscore infrastructure limitations, generalist practice burdens, and misaligned trial offerings, calling for eligibility reform and cooperative trial models. Industry partners examine how overly restrictive criteria and inconsistent protocol practices hinder diversity and propose portfolio-wide strategies, such as protocol watch lists, for inclusive design. Academic oncologists focus on trial complexity, investigator burden, and limited generalizability, advocating for pragmatic and decentralized trial paradigms. Together, these perspectives underscore the shared responsibility across sectors to modernize clinical trial design, reduce access barriers, and ensure that trial participation becomes a standard and equitable component of cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":37969,"journal":{"name":"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting","volume":"45 3","pages":"e100052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK-25-100052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite being a cornerstone of cancer treatment advancement, clinical trials remain inaccessible for many patients because of structural, socioeconomic, and systemic barriers. In this multidisciplinary perspective piece, stakeholders from patient advocacy, community oncology, industry, and academic medicine offer a collaborative overview of key challenges and practical solutions to improve trial accessibility. Patient advocates highlight the need to address language barriers, financial toxicity, and underrepresentation through community engagement and patient-centered trial design. Community oncologists underscore infrastructure limitations, generalist practice burdens, and misaligned trial offerings, calling for eligibility reform and cooperative trial models. Industry partners examine how overly restrictive criteria and inconsistent protocol practices hinder diversity and propose portfolio-wide strategies, such as protocol watch lists, for inclusive design. Academic oncologists focus on trial complexity, investigator burden, and limited generalizability, advocating for pragmatic and decentralized trial paradigms. Together, these perspectives underscore the shared responsibility across sectors to modernize clinical trial design, reduce access barriers, and ensure that trial participation becomes a standard and equitable component of cancer care.

临床试验可及性实用指南:使试验参与成为护理标准。
尽管临床试验是癌症治疗进步的基石,但由于结构、社会经济和系统障碍,许多患者仍然无法进入临床试验。在这篇多学科视角的文章中,来自患者倡导、社区肿瘤学、行业和学术医学的利益相关者提供了一个关键挑战和实际解决方案的协作概述,以提高试验可及性。患者倡导者强调需要通过社区参与和以患者为中心的试验设计来解决语言障碍、财务毒性和代表性不足等问题。社区肿瘤学家强调基础设施的限制、全科医生的执业负担和不一致的试验提供,呼吁资格改革和合作试验模式。行业合作伙伴检查了过度限制的标准和不一致的协议实践如何阻碍了多样性,并为包容性设计提出了投资组合范围的策略,例如协议观察列表。学术肿瘤学家关注试验的复杂性、研究者的负担和有限的普遍性,提倡实用和分散的试验范式。总之,这些观点强调了跨部门的共同责任,使临床试验设计现代化,减少获取障碍,并确保参与试验成为癌症治疗的标准和公平组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Ed Book is a National Library of Medicine–indexed collection of articles written by ASCO Annual Meeting faculty and invited leaders in oncology. Ed Book was launched in 1985 to highlight standards of care and inspire future therapeutic possibilities in oncology. Published annually, each volume highlights the most compelling research and developments across the multidisciplinary fields of oncology and serves as an enduring scholarly resource for all members of the cancer care team long after the Meeting concludes. These articles address issues in the following areas, among others: Immuno-oncology, Surgical, radiation, and medical oncology, Clinical informatics and quality of care, Global health, Survivorship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信